From: Andrey R. <anr...@fr...> - 2012-04-03 19:49:53
|
Greetings, Webmin users list! Please use plain text messages. There was nothing in your post, that warranted explicit HTML. >> There's none. >> It should use "upgrade" for most cases, the only exception is upgrading core, >> which can't be done through regular "upgrade" by default. > > Are you saying that Webmin will automatically adjust the arguments that it > passes to 'apt-get' based upon the specific type of package(s) to be > upgraded? No, i'm saying that it MUST NOT use "install", unless it's upgrading kernel image. "install" will only deal with direct prerequisites/dependencies of the package selected, not looking into more details, nor attempt to apply conflict resolution logic. > If so, why might it be passing '-y install apache2' for a routine > Apache upgrade? It's programmed that way. > He suggests that I use 'apt-get upgrade' to avoid the above issue, but if > Webmin decides which arguments to pass to 'apt-get', is my only option to > perform this particular upgrade on the command-line (which I don't mind > doing). I always use console to run maintenance tasks, like system upgrade. Now, I see, why... -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anr...@fr...) 03.04.2012, <23:24> Sorry for my terrible english... |