|
From: Enrique T. <enr...@gm...> - 2005-09-12 15:30:43
|
Yes, but I think it would be better that each server make its own monitorization, because otherwise there's use of the network (every x seconds with many computers and many monitors) and all the monitorization depends only on one server. And all the monitors must be run at the same time, and with the same interval. 2005/9/12, Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...>: > On 12/Sep/2005 23:17 Enrique Toledano wrote .. > > Hi all > > > > Jamie, could it be possible to have a cluster module for the system > > and server status module, in which we could set monitors for all the > > computers in the cluster at once? I think it would be useful >=20 > I suppose this could be done .. but the existing Status module can > already monitor multiple systems from a single Webmin server. You can > define remote hosts in the Webmin Servers Index module, and then each > monitor in the Status module can be configured to run on a specified > remote host. >=20 > - Jamie >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practic= es > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & Q= A > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > - > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li....n= et > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list > |