RE: [webmin-l] Help !

[Colin R. <co...@cl...>]

> On Sat, 2004-06-12 at 20:54, Colin Raven wrote:
>> On , web...@li...  stated:
>> 
>>> OK Sounds goood, but just to be clear, FBSD 4.10 is the one after
>>> 4.9 not the one after 4.0 :-)
>>> 
>> 
>> Correct, 4.10 follows 4.9.
>> Just so's you know, you're not the first person to do the "eh??"
>> routine.
> ----
> that seems rather counter intuitive when you are using a
> decimal system to represent versioning
> 
> Craig


I agree wholeheartedly, but attempting to cause a sea change within
the ranks of FreeBSD is a more daunting task than the effort of
comprehending a slightly flaky version numbering schema (IMHO).
We can always hope for a more sane approach with the imminent launch
of the 5.0 series...I guess.
Then again, perhaps not.