web-meetme-devel Mailing List for Web-MeetMe

SourceForge Headquarters 225 Broadway Suite 1600 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

That’s exactly what I wanted! https://bit.ly/35qBKOi

Shadhin Rahman

I suggest you have a look http://iamindian.org/look.php
Shadhin Rahman

Greetings  https://bit.ly/2HDz6sn   Shadhin
http://connect.i-worc.com

Shadhin Rahman

http://about.polkadotquilts.com

Shadhin Rahman

hello!

http://www.ramoncompany.es/components/com_content/indexs.php?6bjqu=qr9n

Shadhin rahman

1/31/2013 9:22:45 AM
I didn't contribute anything original really but GPL is good by me too.

Justin

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Dan Austin <Dan...@ph...> wrote:

>  I failed to properly document this project as GPL.
>
> I have all emailed contributions, and know who sent
>
> me major features.
>
>
>
> I will be going through my archives and contacting
>
> contributors to confirm they intended their code
>
> to be released as GPL.
>
>
>
> It would help me however if anyone on the list
>
> who contributed code would send me a brief note
>
> about their contribution, and how they would like to
>
> be credited (by name, name & email).
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Web-meetme-devel mailing list
> Web...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-meetme-devel
>
>

I intended GPL. 

Mike Clark - mik...@wp...

________________________________

From: Dan Austin [mailto:Dan...@Ph...] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 1:44 PM
To: web...@li...
Subject: [Web-meetme-devel] GPL confirmation

I failed to properly document this project as GPL. 

I have all emailed contributions, and know who sent

me major features.

I will be going through my archives and contacting

contributors to confirm they intended their code

to be released as GPL.

It would help me however if anyone on the list

who contributed code would send me a brief note

about their contribution, and how they would like to

be credited (by name, name & email).

Thanks,

Dan

Hi Dan,

Contribution :
Creation of the original project (1st release),
I would like to be credited with name & email
Arezqui Belaid <ar...@gm...>

Yours,
/Areski

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Dan Austin <Dan...@ph...> wrote:

>  I failed to properly document this project as GPL.
>
> I have all emailed contributions, and know who sent
>
> me major features.
>
>
>
> I will be going through my archives and contacting
>
> contributors to confirm they intended their code
>
> to be released as GPL.
>
>
>
> It would help me however if anyone on the list
>
> who contributed code would send me a brief note
>
> about their contribution, and how they would like to
>
> be credited (by name, name & email).
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Web-meetme-devel mailing list
> Web...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-meetme-devel
>
>

-- 
--
   ~     - Belaid Arezqui
  'v'    - Star2Billing CEO : http://www.star2billing.com
 // \\   - Mobile : +34 650 78 43 55
/(   )\
 ^`~'^   - A2Billing Project : http://asterisk2billing.org
 _______________________________________________
- LinkedIN : http://www.linkedin.com/in/areski

I failed to properly document this project as GPL.
I have all emailed contributions, and know who sent
me major features.

I will be going through my archives and contacting
contributors to confirm they intended their code
to be released as GPL.

It would help me however if anyone on the list
who contributed code would send me a brief note
about their contribution, and how they would like to
be credited (by name, name & email).

Thanks,
Dan

All
   As I was going through the web-meet-me installation,  I realized the latest release is missing print.css file.   Please advise on this.  Thanks

I have been focusing lately on migrating the
scheduling and resource limit logic used in
app_cbmysql into app_meetme.

The goal would be to no longer need app_cbmysql
and support a wider range of database backend
through the Asterisk db interfaces, in particular
ODBC.

The good news is that it was not a nightmare to
migrate the logic.  Even better the core Asterisk
developers merged the initial patch to enhance the
RealTime features of app_meetme to support the
scheduling and resource limits.  I went a step
further and added a new feature to allow conference
moderators to extend the conference from the admin
menu.  Sadly that was not merged, as the core
developers want to see testing to confirm that the
RealTime code is compatible with other databases.

I do not have the time or resources to do this, and
would appreciate it if someone with knowledge of Postfix
and or MS-SQL could test RealTime app_meetme from Asterisk
trunk or one of the 1.6.0beta/rc releases.

Thanks,
Dan

This is heads-up about future development efforts
for Web-MeetMe.

Just today the core scheduling features of app_cbmysql
were merge into app_meetme in the Asterisk SVN repository.
There will be a new release of Web-MeetMe intended for
use with Asterisk 1.6 when it is released, and at that
time app_cbmysql will be depreciated.

Unfortunately the database column names in existing
installations do not match what will be used by=20
app_meetme.  So there will be an upgrade script included
to rename the database columns, and it is also likely
that there will be a roll-back script to allow an
installation to be reset back to the original names.

This also means changes to the PHP code in the web
UI to handle the new column names.

The current 3.X branch of Web-MeetMe, including app_cbmysql
should work with Asterisk 1.6 and will be maintained
for some time.

Advantages:
	More developer eyes on the scheduling code
	Elimination of the cbEnd.php script
	Opens the door to adding audio menu option to
		extend a conference in progress
	Database options.  Using the RealTime options
		in app_meetme with ODBC means we are no
		longer limited to using MySQL

Disadvantages:
	Upgrading.  It is possible install and test
		new versions of the 2.X and 3.X web interfaces
		in parallel with an existing setup.  This
		will not work with 4.0

It looks like Asterisk 1.6 may be available a lot
sooner than expected, so I will be working on the
changes required to be ready for that release.

Dan

I was exploring the new services and donations options
and meant to tweak only my donation preferences, but
it looked like it changed it globally.

We've never received any donations, but looking at the
Settings that's because the project did not have opt-in=20
set on our accounts.

Should we setup an account that can receive donations
(if we receive any) and then divvy them up?

Dan

I've started looking at merging the functionality
of app_cbmysql into app_meetme.  One of the results
is that I am not completely happy with the current
table layout.

I'm thinking to split booking into two tables, one
for the actual conference settings, and one for the
ownership/description details.  This would allow me
to reduce the overall DB size and allow app_meetme
to only retrieve information it needs.

The major drawback to this is I think I will need to
write an upgrade script to migrate data from the current
layout to the new one.  Which is something I am sure
to screw up.

Before investing too much time on this I thought I would
ask for comments on the new layout I am proposing, and see
if anyone would like to help with the upgrade script.

CREATE TABLE `booking` (
  `bookId` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment,
  `confno` varchar(30) default '0',
  `userpin` varchar(30) NOT NULL default '0',
  `modpin` varchar(30) NOT NULL default '0',
  `uFlags` varchar(10) NOT NULL default '',
  `mFlags` varchar(10) NOT NULL default '',
  `maxUser` varchar(30) NOT NULL default '10',
  `startTime` datetime NOT NULL default '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
  `endTime` datetime NOT NULL default '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
  `dateReq` datetime NOT NULL default '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
  `dateMod` datetime NOT NULL default '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
  `status` varchar(30) NOT NULL default 'A',
  `sequenceNo` int(10) unsigned default '0',
  `bdId` int(10) NOT NULL default '0',
  PRIMARY KEY  (`bookId`)
) ENGINE=3DMyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=3Dlatin1 AUTO_INCREMENT=3D145 ;

CREATE TABLE `bookingDetails` (
  `bookId` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment,
  `clientId` int(10) unsigned default '0',
  `status` varchar(30) NOT NULL default 'A',
  `confOwner` varchar(30) NOT NULL default '',
  `confDesc` varchar(100) NOT NULL default '',
  `recurInterval` int(10) unsigned default '0',
  PRIMARY KEY  (`bookId`)
) ENGINE=3DMyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=3Dlatin1 AUTO_INCREMENT=3D145 ;

CREATE TABLE 'wmm_Version'(
	'ver' int (10) NOT NULL default '5',
	PRIMARY KEY ('ver')
) ENGINE=3DMyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=3Dlatin1 AUTO_INCREMENT=3D145 ;

The last table is intended to make future upgrades
easier by being able to check what version of the table
layout is in use.

Thanks,
Dan

Cool.  I had a few minutes and thought to start on it, but I would
prefer to

let someone who needs it to code it.

=20

Keep in mind that is should be optional and if not set in lib/defines
the

code to check and enforce the limit must not be run.

=20

Dan

=20

From: Jason Craig [mailto:jas...@ro...]=20
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 6:00 AM
To: Dan Austin
Cc: Web...@li...
Subject: RE: Web-MeetMe suggestion

=20

Thanks for the reply Dan!

=20

I may attempt adding the feature myself on one of our development boxes
and if i'm succesful i'll certainly let you and the web-meetme-devel
list know what I added to make it work so it can be incorporated into a
future release if you wish.

=20

Thanks again.

=20

Jason

=20

=20

________________________________

From: Dan Austin [mailto:Dan...@Ph...]
Sent: Fri 1/12/2007 4:42 PM
To: Jason Craig
Cc: Web...@li...
Subject: RE: Web-MeetMe suggestion

It is not only feasible, it was an early design consideration.  I did
not

actually implement it as we had more than enough connectivity.

=20

I can add it to me my list of desired features, but cannot estimate

a timeline to implement.  I tend to focus on features my users need

or want, with everything else left for when I have spare time.

=20

Dan

=20

From: Jason Craig [mailto:jas...@ro...]=20
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 1:04 PM
To: Dan Austin; ar...@gm...
Subject: Web-MeetMe suggestion

=20

Good afternoon guys,

=20

I first want to say you guys have done a great job on Web-MeetMe!  I've
been testing it for a little while and will probably be rolling it out
to our employees so they can schedule their own conferences and we can
ditch our telco's conferencing and start hosting our own.

=20

I have a suggestion for a future release of Web-MeetMe.  What are the
chances on adding a variable such as inside defines.php where the admin
can define the total maximum number of channels/participants/ports that
can simultaneously be used by all concurrent conferences.

=20

Ie. If a company wants to dedicate a PRI with 23 channels to
conferencing, the maximum number of partipants could only be 23
(assuming they are all external).  When a user was adding a conference,
before it gets added it checks to see if there are other conferences
scheduled at the same time.  If there are it will only add the
conference if the total of the previously scheduled conferences + the
newly added participants is less than the system limit.  If its higher
it will reject the request and possibly tell the user scheduling the
conference there are not enough ports available.

=20

Is this something that's feasible?

=20

=20

Thanks,

=20

Jason

=20

Thanks for the reply Dan!
=20
I may attempt adding the feature myself on one of our development boxes =
and if i'm succesful i'll certainly let you and the web-meetme-devel =
list know what I added to make it work so it can be incorporated into a =
future release if you wish.
=20
Thanks again.
=20
Jason
=20

________________________________

From: Dan Austin [mailto:Dan...@Ph...]
Sent: Fri 1/12/2007 4:42 PM
To: Jason Craig
Cc: Web...@li...
Subject: RE: Web-MeetMe suggestion

It is not only feasible, it was an early design consideration.  I did =
not

actually implement it as we had more than enough connectivity.

=20

I can add it to me my list of desired features, but cannot estimate

a timeline to implement.  I tend to focus on features my users need

or want, with everything else left for when I have spare time.

=20

Dan

=20

From: Jason Craig [mailto:jas...@ro...]=20
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 1:04 PM
To: Dan Austin; ar...@gm...
Subject: Web-MeetMe suggestion

=20

Good afternoon guys,

=20

I first want to say you guys have done a great job on Web-MeetMe!  I've =
been testing it for a little while and will probably be rolling it out =
to our employees so they can schedule their own conferences and we can =
ditch our telco's conferencing and start hosting our own.

=20

I have a suggestion for a future release of Web-MeetMe.  What are the =
chances on adding a variable such as inside defines.php where the admin =
can define the total maximum number of channels/participants/ports that =
can simultaneously be used by all concurrent conferences.

=20

Ie. If a company wants to dedicate a PRI with 23 channels to =
conferencing, the maximum number of partipants could only be 23 =
(assuming they are all external).  When a user was adding a conference, =
before it gets added it checks to see if there are other conferences =
scheduled at the same time.  If there are it will only add the =
conference if the total of the previously scheduled conferences + the =
newly added participants is less than the system limit.  If its higher =
it will reject the request and possibly tell the user scheduling the =
conference there are not enough ports available.

=20

Is this something that's feasible?

=20

=20

Thanks,

=20

Jason

=20

I just checked in some changes that make
it easier to customize the options presented
in the web interface for Moderator and user
flags.

This modification got me thinking about=20
dependencies in the options themselves.

If no Moderator pin is set and the user
selects the "Wait for Leader" option, the
conference will be unusable.  I'm trying to
think of the best way to handle this.  A
small javascript snippet of code could be
called to set the moderator pin, or we could
trigger an alert pop to warn the user that
they must set the pin.

I'm interested in hearing your thoughts on
this.

Dan

I've fixed (at least to my satisfaction) the DST bug,
and identified and fixed a problem with app_cbmysql and
The earlyalert feature.  I've also cleaned up some of
the UI quirks that made it into the 3.0.0 release.

I'm planning on a 3.0.1 release early next week, and
wondered if anyone has identified any other issues that
should be cleaned up?

Dan

It is not only feasible, it was an early design consideration.  I did
not

actually implement it as we had more than enough connectivity.

=20

I can add it to me my list of desired features, but cannot estimate

a timeline to implement.  I tend to focus on features my users need

or want, with everything else left for when I have spare time.

=20

Dan

=20

From: Jason Craig [mailto:jas...@ro...]=20
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 1:04 PM
To: Dan Austin; ar...@gm...
Subject: Web-MeetMe suggestion

=20

Good afternoon guys,

=20

I first want to say you guys have done a great job on Web-MeetMe!  I've
been testing it for a little while and will probably be rolling it out
to our employees so they can schedule their own conferences and we can
ditch our telco's conferencing and start hosting our own.

=20

I have a suggestion for a future release of Web-MeetMe.  What are the
chances on adding a variable such as inside defines.php where the admin
can define the total maximum number of channels/participants/ports that
can simultaneously be used by all concurrent conferences.

=20

Ie. If a company wants to dedicate a PRI with 23 channels to
conferencing, the maximum number of partipants could only be 23
(assuming they are all external).  When a user was adding a conference,
before it gets added it checks to see if there are other conferences
scheduled at the same time.  If there are it will only add the
conference if the total of the previously scheduled conferences + the
newly added participants is less than the system limit.  If its higher
it will reject the request and possibly tell the user scheduling the
conference there are not enough ports available.

=20

Is this something that's feasible?

=20

=20

Thanks,

=20

Jason

=20

I had tested support for DST transitions in an
earlier release, but the new and improved recurring
meeting support has exposed an odd little bug.

The logic is pretty straight forward, once I figure
out a way to see if recurring conference will cross
a DST transition.  The new transition schedule and
apparent lack of rules is making it not very obvious.

Any thoughts?

Dan

Now that the web interface is using PEAR::DB, half of the suite
just doesn't care what the database backed is.  I'm toying with
the idea of porting app_cbmysql to use ODBC instead of linking
directly to MySQL.

I have no really need for it, and am happy with MySQL, but I'd
interested in your thoughts.  Would a more generic app_cbmysql
be of value in your installations?

I also suppose that if I were to port it to ODBC, we should
pick a new name.  Any suggestions?

Dan

Nothing that I know of, I will be packaging up updates to the 2.x branch
shortly after as well.

Justin

On 1/2/07, Dan Austin <Dan...@ph...> wrote:
>
> Asterisk 1.4.0 is now out, so I'm about ready to package
> up 3.0.0 and announce it.  Are there any last minute
> requests/fixes that need to be handled before it
> 'ships'?
>
> Dan
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Web-meetme-devel mailing list
> Web...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-meetme-devel
>

-- 
Justin

Asterisk 1.4.0 is now out, so I'm about ready to package
up 3.0.0 and announce it.  Are there any last minute=20
requests/fixes that need to be handled before it
'ships'?

Dan

Odd, I only logon as an Admin and I did not encounter any problems.
=20
I've handled a similar issue by moving the WHERE into $FG_CLAUSE, so
a blank $FG_CLAUSE also returns everything.  Either solution works for
me.
=20
Dan

________________________________

	From: web...@li...
[mailto:web...@li...] On Behalf Of
Justin Hamade
	Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2006 1:51 PM
	To: Web...@li...
	Subject: [Web-meetme-devel] Bug fixed in conf_delete.php
=09
=09
	Found a bug and fixed it.  There was no condition for when and
Admin is logged to set the$FG_CLAUSE so the sql was incorret and gave
... WHERE LIMIT ...=20
=09
	I just added:
	 else if (defined('AUTH_TYPE') && ($_SESSION['privilege'] =3D=3D
"Admin"))=20
	{
	        $FG_CLAUSE =3D "1";
	}
=09
	so the sql is WHERE 1 LIMIT ... which should be all rows.
=09
	--=20
	Justin=20

2006	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun (8)	Jul (16)	Aug	Sep (2)	Oct (4)	Nov (5)	Dec
2007	Jan (9)	Feb	Mar	Apr (1)	May	Jun (1)	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct (1)	Nov	Dec
2008	Jan	Feb	Mar (1)	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov (1)	Dec
2010	Jan	Feb	Mar (4)	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2013	Jan (1)	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2017	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul (1)	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2018	Jan	Feb	Mar (1)	Apr	May (1)	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2019	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug (1)	Sep	Oct (1)	Nov	Dec

web-meetme-devel Mailing List for Web-MeetMe

web-meetme-devel — Developers discussion