You can subscribe to this list here.
2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Dan A. <Dan...@Ph...> - 2006-07-06 17:21:37
|
I've got the current SVN code running on three internal servers, and so far almost everything is working as expected. I've started to prepare for 1.4, but that will require/result in a number of changes not exactly compatible with 1.2. I'd like to cut a release with the latest fixes and features before moving forward. Plans for Asterisk 1.40- * Update app_cbmysql to new loader mechanism * Integrate new meetme options * Improved mute/unmute logic * meetme list concise (reduce monitor parser complexity) Also on the ToDo list is to try to get cbEnd.php to work better than it does currently. It now seems to tolerate Asterisk restarting, but I've had one case where a large number of perticipates left a conference at the same time, and cbEnd hung, using 99% of system CPU. So, any objections to a release? Dan |
From: Areski <ar...@gm...> - 2006-06-14 10:07:58
|
As you can see from Benchmarks the AdoDB is much efficient than Pear http://phplens.com/lens/adodb/ and honestly it takes few minutes to migrate as they have some method with the same name in order to facilitate the pear-adodb migration. We did it 3 weeks ago for A2Billing and it's worth it :D Rgds, Areski On 6/14/06, Dan Austin <Dan...@ph...> wrote: > > Dan Austin wrote: > > Don't sweet it. I've been coding like a mad man, as a recent > > upgrade here finally killed the proprietary conferencing platform > > we were using. That basically forced management to let me deploy > > Asterisk and Web-MeetMe. The response internally has been excellent, > > and goaded me into adding a number of planned features. > > > > I've found a couple of issues that involve your code that I could > > not determine the best way to proceed. > > > > 1. _SESSION['userid'] vs _SESSION['username'] > > You have both, but the code seems to prefer userid, except > > for displaying the conference owner. The easiest fix would > > be for LDAP authentication to set both, but I'm not clear on > > why both are needed. > > > This is probably bad coding on my part. I can review the latest code > to > > make it consistent and eliminate the unneeded one (probably > 'username'. > > This is related to me eliminating the need for a text username and > > simply using email addresses for login. > I started to convert the LDAP code to userid, but stopped when I saw you > had both. There is only a couple of instances left in the svn tree. > > > 2. The direct MySQL queries. > > I really like the functionality you added using them, and > > I've done the same in a couple of new features, but this breaks > > the database agnostic approach, and likely ends support for > > postgres. While I don't use postgres, I think we should try > > to maintain the flexibility. > > > I thought I used the PEAR DB libraries which support MySQL, PostgreSQL > > > and several othe DBs.I find those routines much easier to read and > > understand than what was being used. Another option is ADODB. I have > > never used that abstarction library, but understand it is more > efficient > > than the PEAR routines. It does support all the major RDBMSes. > > > You may have. I did not notice any new libraries, and was not really > focused on them, so I might have missed them. > > > Oh, and I just added a redirect on my home server to point people > > looking for the package to SF and saw the stats jump quite a bit. > > > Thanks, > > Mike > > > _______________________________________________ > Web-meetme-devel mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-meetme-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > Web-meetme-devel mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-meetme-devel > -- -- ~ - Belaid Arezqui ( ar...@gm... ) 'v' - Cell Phone. : (+34) 650 78 43 55 (Spain, GMT+1hr) // \\ /( )\ - CHAMELEON FAITH HEALER ^`~'^ - http://www.areski.net - http://asterisk2billing.org/ _______________________________________________ -- To support Asterisk2Billing - paypal account : in...@ar... |
From: Dan A. <Dan...@Ph...> - 2006-06-14 03:35:31
|
I've been waiting for 1.4 to settle down. I had hoped that someone with more experience in the Asterisk code would tackle the first pass, and then I could help, but the RealTime effort for MeetMe appears to have stalled. Dan -----Original Message----- From: web...@li... [mailto:web...@li...] On Behalf Of Mike Clark Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 7:35 PM To: Web...@li... Subject: [Web-meetme-devel] Realtime MeetMe Dan: Any new developments on the RealTime MeetMe front? That sure would be nice. Mike _______________________________________________ Web-meetme-devel mailing list Web...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-meetme-devel |
From: Dan A. <Dan...@Ph...> - 2006-06-14 03:33:48
|
=20 Dan Austin wrote: > Don't sweet it. I've been coding like a mad man, as a recent > upgrade here finally killed the proprietary conferencing platform > we were using. That basically forced management to let me deploy > Asterisk and Web-MeetMe. The response internally has been excellent, > and goaded me into adding a number of planned features. >=20 > I've found a couple of issues that involve your code that I could > not determine the best way to proceed. >=20 > 1. _SESSION['userid'] vs _SESSION['username'] > You have both, but the code seems to prefer userid, except > for displaying the conference owner. The easiest fix would > be for LDAP authentication to set both, but I'm not clear on > why both are needed. > This is probably bad coding on my part. I can review the latest code to=20 > make it consistent and eliminate the unneeded one (probably 'username'.=20 > This is related to me eliminating the need for a text username and=20 > simply using email addresses for login. I started to convert the LDAP code to userid, but stopped when I saw you had both. There is only a couple of instances left in the svn tree. > 2. The direct MySQL queries.=20 > I really like the functionality you added using them, and=20 > I've done the same in a couple of new features, but this breaks > the database agnostic approach, and likely ends support for > postgres. While I don't use postgres, I think we should try > to maintain the flexibility. > I thought I used the PEAR DB libraries which support MySQL, PostgreSQL > and several othe DBs.I find those routines much easier to read and=20 > understand than what was being used. Another option is ADODB. I have=20 > never used that abstarction library, but understand it is more efficient=20 > than the PEAR routines. It does support all the major RDBMSes. >=20 You may have. I did not notice any new libraries, and was not really=20 focused on them, so I might have missed them. > Oh, and I just added a redirect on my home server to point people > looking for the package to SF and saw the stats jump quite a bit. >=20 Thanks, Mike _______________________________________________ Web-meetme-devel mailing list Web...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-meetme-devel |
From: Mike C. <mik...@wp...> - 2006-06-14 02:35:32
|
Dan: Any new developments on the RealTime MeetMe front? That sure would be nice. Mike |
From: Mike C. <mik...@wp...> - 2006-06-14 02:32:30
|
Dan Austin wrote: > Don't sweet it. I've been coding like a mad man, as a recent > upgrade here finally killed the proprietary conferencing platform > we were using. That basically forced management to let me deploy > Asterisk and Web-MeetMe. The response internally has been excellent, > and goaded me into adding a number of planned features. > > I've found a couple of issues that involve your code that I could > not determine the best way to proceed. > > 1. _SESSION['userid'] vs _SESSION['username'] > You have both, but the code seems to prefer userid, except > for displaying the conference owner. The easiest fix would > be for LDAP authentication to set both, but I'm not clear on > why both are needed. This is probably bad coding on my part. I can review the latest code to make it consistent and eliminate the unneeded one (probably 'username'. This is related to me eliminating the need for a text username and simply using email addresses for login. > 2. The direct MySQL queries. > I really like the functionality you added using them, and > I've done the same in a couple of new features, but this breaks > the database agnostic approach, and likely ends support for > postgres. While I don't use postgres, I think we should try > to maintain the flexibility. I thought I used the PEAR DB libraries which support MySQL, PostgreSQL and several othe DBs.I find those routines much easier to read and understand than what was being used. Another option is ADODB. I have never used that abstarction library, but understand it is more efficient than the PEAR routines. It does support all the major RDBMSes. > > Oh, and I just added a redirect on my home server to point people > looking for the package to SF and saw the stats jump quite a bit. > Thanks, Mike |
From: Dan A. <Dan...@Ph...> - 2006-06-13 21:33:12
|
Don't sweet it. I've been coding like a mad man, as a recent upgrade here finally killed the proprietary conferencing platform we were using. That basically forced management to let me deploy Asterisk and Web-MeetMe. The response internally has been excellent, and goaded me into adding a number of planned features. I've found a couple of issues that involve your code that I could not determine the best way to proceed. 1. _SESSION['userid'] vs _SESSION['username'] You have both, but the code seems to prefer userid, except for displaying the conference owner. The easiest fix would be for LDAP authentication to set both, but I'm not clear on why both are needed. 2. The direct MySQL queries.=20 I really like the functionality you added using them, and=20 I've done the same in a couple of new features, but this breaks the database agnostic approach, and likely ends support for postgres. While I don't use postgres, I think we should try to maintain the flexibility. Oh, and I just added a redirect on my home server to point people looking for the package to SF and saw the stats jump quite a bit. Dan -----Original Message----- From: Mike Clark [mailto:mik...@wp...]=20 Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 2:18 PM To: Dan Austin; Web...@li... Subject: Re: [Web-meetme-devel] testing Dan Austin wrote: > SF claims that the mail list issues have been resolved..... >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Web-meetme-devel mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-meetme-devel >=20 Dan: Just shoot me. I apologize for not getting back sooner. Things have been crazy lately. I did get your prior emails. I will review tonight at the=20 hotel and reply. I am just completing a major IVR project, so I hope my=20 schedule will be opening up more over the next few weeks. Mike |
From: Mike C. <mik...@wp...> - 2006-06-13 21:18:07
|
Dan Austin wrote: > SF claims that the mail list issues have been resolved..... > > > _______________________________________________ > Web-meetme-devel mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-meetme-devel > Dan: Just shoot me. I apologize for not getting back sooner. Things have been crazy lately. I did get your prior emails. I will review tonight at the hotel and reply. I am just completing a major IVR project, so I hope my schedule will be opening up more over the next few weeks. Mike |
From: Dan A. <Dan...@Ph...> - 2006-06-13 20:45:56
|
SF claims that the mail list issues have been resolved..... |