Menu
▾
▴
web-erp-developers — Discussion on development of webERP
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(46) |
Mar
(65) |
Apr
(49) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(79) |
Aug
(228) |
Sep
(347) |
Oct
(272) |
Nov
(270) |
Dec
(424) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(549) |
Feb
(232) |
Mar
(134) |
Apr
(103) |
May
(57) |
Jun
(74) |
Jul
(67) |
Aug
(45) |
Sep
(99) |
Oct
(187) |
Nov
(238) |
Dec
(127) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(81) |
Feb
(137) |
Mar
(46) |
Apr
(55) |
May
(62) |
Jun
(152) |
Jul
(137) |
Aug
(154) |
Sep
(176) |
Oct
(104) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(64) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(56) |
Feb
(303) |
Mar
(88) |
Apr
(80) |
May
(72) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(47) |
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(113) |
Oct
(49) |
Nov
(89) |
Dec
(24) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(61) |
Mar
(43) |
Apr
(51) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(49) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(50) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(87) |
Feb
(144) |
Mar
(54) |
Apr
(72) |
May
(32) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(90) |
Sep
(349) |
Oct
(174) |
Nov
(320) |
Dec
(110) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(162) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(80) |
Apr
(126) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(75) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(100) |
Oct
(57) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(125) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(72) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(63) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(123) |
Jun
(100) |
Jul
(96) |
Aug
(84) |
Sep
(83) |
Oct
(39) |
Nov
(166) |
Dec
(103) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(158) |
Feb
(148) |
Mar
(77) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(126) |
Jun
(82) |
Jul
(67) |
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(109) |
Oct
(30) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(34) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(16) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(79) |
May
(76) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(76) |
Aug
(36) |
Sep
(22) |
Oct
(35) |
Nov
(167) |
Dec
(93) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(57) |
Apr
(63) |
May
(60) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(24) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(70) |
Nov
(45) |
Dec
(52) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(56) |
Feb
(73) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(6) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
(7) |
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
| 2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
| 2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2024 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(30) |
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
|
From: Phil D. <we...@pa...> - 2004-10-20 08:55:44
|
I have included Chris's fresh theme and bullets in the CVS. I noticed there are .png images and .gif images - I am not sure which ones are used do you know Chris - I will lose the ones we dont need. Phil |
|
From: Daintrees <p.d...@pa...> - 2004-10-20 00:02:30
|
MessageOK I will do this at the weekend. Phil ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Rajnesh D. Singh=20 To: p.d...@pa...=20 Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 7:46 PM Subject: webERP Hi Phil, You mentioned on the list you were planning an interim release soon. Any timeframe on this? I want to deploy the product but would prefer the release with various = fixes as I need to put into production. Cheers; R. |
|
From: Chris B. <cb...@en...> - 2004-10-19 13:43:10
|
Sure. It also requires a change to the index.php. It's a simple <li></li> before and after each link. -----Original Message----- From: web...@li... [mailto:web...@li...] On Behalf Of Daintrees Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 12:40 AM To: web...@li... Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Interface Cleanup and Connection Speed Setting Beautiful!! This is really great. Do we have a new default theme ? Please would you send me the theme directory and images Chris? Phil ----- Original Message ----- From: skaill <mailto:sk...@ro...> To: web...@li... Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 10:45 AM Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Interface Cleanup and Connection Speed Setting I like the 3 graphics much better than the ones we are using! I wonder what Phil would think about using them instead of the current ones and if you're offering them, Chris. I also like the color theme. It could be a third theme if you chose to volunteer it... The arrows for each option...maybe. Steve ----- Original Message ----- From: Chris Bice <mailto:cb...@en...> To: web...@li... Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 3:33 PM Subject: RE: [Web-erp-developers] Interface Cleanup and Connection Speed Setting I like it. I have changed the design a little bit too. Here it is: http://www.encore-inc.com/test/chrisb.jpg Tell me what you think. -----Original Message----- From: web...@li... [mailto:web...@li...] On Behalf Of skaill Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 1:10 PM To: web...@li... Subject: [Web-erp-developers] Interface Cleanup and Connection Speed Setting Been doing some more work on the interface. Cleaned it up including going through the css. Making sure the css validates at the same time! Besides the nuance changes to the interface, there are a few new graphics, main area lines taken out and a new option so the user can set connection speed. When set to "slow" none of the main graphics appear and when "fast" they do appear. This is all tentative development found here for now...http://weberp.gocom.ca/weberp2. Try changing the demo user connection speed to see graphics or not. Steve |
|
From: skaill <sk...@ro...> - 2004-10-19 09:52:28
|
Yes, I agree...well, except for the slow/fast part but I understand not =
having it as well. The only reason I was trying those new background =
graphics in the 3 main options areas is because they are extremely =
small. They are the same size as the 3 tiny graphics we already have. =
Even though they are way larger they can be that small in filesize =
because they are so faded.
I understand if you still do not want them but would offer that I think =
they spruce it up considerably and there are more ways I can decrease =
the size including:
1) decrease the existing 3 graphics
2) probably decrease the 3 new ones further
3) possibly use one graphic in all 3 sections instead of 3 different =
graphics. Don't like as much though.
Anyway, just some thoughts but as I say I will understand if you do not =
want...
I definitely don't want to open the door up to all kinds of graphics =
either for the reasons you have specified.
This suggestion is purely an appeal/marketing issue. On top of having =
the pictures there, they are also meant to link subliminally to the new =
website banner pics which are the same. Hence instilling continuity and =
branding.
Steve
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Daintrees=20
To: web...@li...=20
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Interface Cleanup and Connection =
Speed Setting
I'm not big on graphics as you know!
Please, lets not compromise on the 'lean and mean' philosophy. A user =
may connect on a LAN and while away in some remote corner of the world =
with a miserable connection. I'd prefer not to go down the track of fast =
and slow connections. I'd rather the system was fast on a slow =
connection and absolutely blazing on a fast one.
Phil
----- Original Message -----=20
From: skaill=20
To: web...@li...=20
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 7:10 AM
Subject: [Web-erp-developers] Interface Cleanup and Connection Speed =
Setting
Been doing some more work on the interface. Cleaned it up including =
going through the css. Making sure the css validates at the same time!
Besides the nuance changes to the interface, there are a few new =
graphics, main area lines taken out and a new option so the user can set =
connection speed. When set to "slow" none of the main graphics appear =
and when "fast" they do appear.
This is all tentative development found here for =
now...http://weberp.gocom.ca/weberp2.
Try changing the demo user connection speed to see graphics or not.
Steve |
|
From: skaill <sk...@ro...> - 2004-10-19 09:37:52
|
FYI: From the HTML manual at www.w3c.org... HTML 4.01 specifies three DTDs, so authors must include one of the following document type declarations in their documents. The DTDs vary in the elements they support. a.. The HTML 4.01 Strict DTD includes all elements and attributes that have not been deprecated or do not appear in frameset documents. For documents that use this DTD, use this document type declaration: <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd"> b.. The HTML 4.01 Transitional DTD includes everything in the strict DTD plus deprecated elements and attributes (most of which concern visual presentation). For documents that use this DTD, use this document type declaration: <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> c.. The HTML 4.01 Frameset DTD includes everything in the transitional DTD plus frames as well. For documents that use this DTD, use this document type declaration: <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Frameset//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/frameset.dtd">Could probably change 4.0 to 4.01. My older HTML Tidy puts 4.0 automatically until I upgrade. This specifies the type of document. You want transitional as opposed to strict because strict would not handle the deprecated elements!Steve ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Daintree" <we...@pa...> To: <web...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 5:21 AM Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Header info > No idea what the function of this is but included it anyway - I am sure you're > right! > > Phil > > On Tuesday 19 October 2004 07:49, skaill wrote: > > I think at the very beginning of header.inc should be... > > > > echo '<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">'; > > > > Steve > > -- > Phil > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers |
|
From: Phil D. <we...@pa...> - 2004-10-19 09:18:34
|
No idea what the function of this is but included it anyway - I am sure you're right! Phil On Tuesday 19 October 2004 07:49, skaill wrote: > I think at the very beginning of header.inc should be... > > echo '<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">'; > > Steve -- Phil |
|
From: Daintrees <p.d...@pa...> - 2004-10-19 05:40:46
|
I'm not big on graphics as you know! Please, lets not compromise on the 'lean and mean' philosophy. A user = may connect on a LAN and while away in some remote corner of the world = with a miserable connection. I'd prefer not to go down the track of fast = and slow connections. I'd rather the system was fast on a slow = connection and absolutely blazing on a fast one. Phil ----- Original Message -----=20 From: skaill=20 To: web...@li...=20 Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 7:10 AM Subject: [Web-erp-developers] Interface Cleanup and Connection Speed = Setting Been doing some more work on the interface. Cleaned it up including = going through the css. Making sure the css validates at the same time! Besides the nuance changes to the interface, there are a few new = graphics, main area lines taken out and a new option so the user can set = connection speed. When set to "slow" none of the main graphics appear = and when "fast" they do appear. This is all tentative development found here for = now...http://weberp.gocom.ca/weberp2. Try changing the demo user connection speed to see graphics or not. Steve |
|
From: Daintrees <p.d...@pa...> - 2004-10-19 05:36:44
|
Beautiful!!
This is really great. Do we have a new default theme ?
Please would you send me the theme directory and images Chris?
Phil
----- Original Message -----=20
From: skaill=20
To: web...@li...=20
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Interface Cleanup and Connection =
Speed Setting
I like the 3 graphics much better than the ones we are using! I =
wonder what Phil would think about using them instead of the current =
ones and if you're offering them, Chris. I also like the color theme. =
It could be a third theme if you chose to volunteer it...
The arrows for each option...maybe.
Steve
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Chris Bice=20
To: web...@li...=20
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 3:33 PM
Subject: RE: [Web-erp-developers] Interface Cleanup and Connection =
Speed Setting
I like it. I have changed the design a little bit too. Here it is:
=20
http://www.encore-inc.com/test/chrisb.jpg
=20
Tell me what you think.
=20
-----Original Message-----
From: web...@li... =
[mailto:web...@li...] On Behalf Of =
skaill
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 1:10 PM
To: web...@li...
Subject: [Web-erp-developers] Interface Cleanup and Connection Speed =
Setting
=20
Been doing some more work on the interface. Cleaned it up including =
going through the css. Making sure the css validates at the same time!
=20
Besides the nuance changes to the interface, there are a few new =
graphics, main area lines taken out and a new option so the user can set =
connection speed. When set to "slow" none of the main graphics appear =
and when "fast" they do appear.
=20
This is all tentative development found here for =
now...http://weberp.gocom.ca/weberp2.
=20
Try changing the demo user connection speed to see graphics or not.
=20
Steve
|
|
From: david l. <dav...@ya...> - 2004-10-19 00:33:51
|
i like new interface. the function list is more compact.and now need not scroll mouse. --- Chris Bice <cb...@en...> 的正文： > I like it. I have changed the design a little bit > too. Here it is: > > http://www.encore-inc.com/test/chrisb.jpg > > Tell me what you think. > > -----Original Message----- > From: web...@li... > [mailto:web...@li...] > On Behalf Of > skaill > Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 1:10 PM > To: web...@li... > Subject: [Web-erp-developers] Interface Cleanup and > Connection Speed > Setting > > Been doing some more work on the interface. Cleaned > it up including > going through the css. Making sure the css > validates at the same time! > > Besides the nuance changes to the interface, there > are a few new > graphics, main area lines taken out and a new option > so the user can set > connection speed. When set to "slow" none of the > main graphics appear > and when "fast" they do appear. > > This is all tentative development found here for > now...http://weberp.gocom.ca/weberp2. > > Try changing the demo user connection speed to see > graphics or not. > > Steve > _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? 150万曲MP3疯狂搜，带您闯入音乐殿堂 http://music.yisou.com/ 美女明星应有尽有，搜遍美图、艳图和酷图 http://image.yisou.com 1G就是1000兆，雅虎电邮自助扩容！ http://cn.rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tag/1g/*http://cn.mail.yahoo.com/event/mail_1g/ |
|
From: skaill <sk...@ro...> - 2004-10-18 21:43:55
|
I like the 3 graphics much better than the ones we are using! I wonder = what Phil would think about using them instead of the current ones and = if you're offering them, Chris. I also like the color theme. It could = be a third theme if you chose to volunteer it... The arrows for each option...maybe. Steve ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Chris Bice=20 To: web...@li...=20 Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 3:33 PM Subject: RE: [Web-erp-developers] Interface Cleanup and Connection = Speed Setting I like it. I have changed the design a little bit too. Here it is: =20 http://www.encore-inc.com/test/chrisb.jpg =20 Tell me what you think. =20 -----Original Message----- From: web...@li... = [mailto:web...@li...] On Behalf Of = skaill Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 1:10 PM To: web...@li... Subject: [Web-erp-developers] Interface Cleanup and Connection Speed = Setting =20 Been doing some more work on the interface. Cleaned it up including = going through the css. Making sure the css validates at the same time! =20 Besides the nuance changes to the interface, there are a few new = graphics, main area lines taken out and a new option so the user can set = connection speed. When set to "slow" none of the main graphics appear = and when "fast" they do appear. =20 This is all tentative development found here for = now...http://weberp.gocom.ca/weberp2. =20 Try changing the demo user connection speed to see graphics or not. =20 Steve |
|
From: Chris B. <cb...@en...> - 2004-10-18 19:33:12
|
I like it. I have changed the design a little bit too. Here it is: http://www.encore-inc.com/test/chrisb.jpg Tell me what you think. -----Original Message----- From: web...@li... [mailto:web...@li...] On Behalf Of skaill Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 1:10 PM To: web...@li... Subject: [Web-erp-developers] Interface Cleanup and Connection Speed Setting Been doing some more work on the interface. Cleaned it up including going through the css. Making sure the css validates at the same time! Besides the nuance changes to the interface, there are a few new graphics, main area lines taken out and a new option so the user can set connection speed. When set to "slow" none of the main graphics appear and when "fast" they do appear. This is all tentative development found here for now...http://weberp.gocom.ca/weberp2. Try changing the demo user connection speed to see graphics or not. Steve |
|
From: skaill <sk...@ro...> - 2004-10-18 18:47:51
|
I think at the very beginning of header.inc should be... echo '<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">'; Steve |
|
From: skaill <sk...@ro...> - 2004-10-18 18:09:04
|
Been doing some more work on the interface. Cleaned it up including = going through the css. Making sure the css validates at the same time! Besides the nuance changes to the interface, there are a few new = graphics, main area lines taken out and a new option so the user can set = connection speed. When set to "slow" none of the main graphics appear = and when "fast" they do appear. This is all tentative development found here for = now...http://weberp.gocom.ca/weberp2. Try changing the demo user connection speed to see graphics or not. Steve |
|
From: skaill <sk...@ro...> - 2004-10-18 01:54:36
|
Absolutely need at least 4 decimals, not more than 5 I don't believe ever. They lose money without. Steve ----- Original Message ----- From: "david luo" <dav...@ya...> To: <web...@li...> Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 9:49 PM Subject: Re: [Web-erp-users] Prices > at least 4 decimal is necessary.i saw many company's > price is 4 decimal. > --- Phil Daintree <ph...@du...> 的正文： > > Hi Melvin, > > > > The system does not allow pricing to more than 2 > > decimal places. > > I will look at extending this input box and consider > > the implications > > > > > > Phil > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Melvin Sequera" <kat...@ya...> > > To: <web...@li...> > > Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 2:20 PM > > Subject: [Web-erp-users] Prices > > > > > > > Hi. I have a question about setting the prices to > > the > > > products. I know that we can create multiple price > > > lists, but when I try to put the price the field > > only > > > take 4 integers and 2 decimals. If I try to set a > > > price like 19.500 the I can磘 set the price with > > > decimals because the field doesn't allow me more > > > numbers. Any help? > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Informaci髇 de Estados Unidos y Am閞ica Latina, en > > Yahoo! Noticias. > > > Vis韙anos en http://noticias.espanol.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product > > Guide on ITManagersJournal > > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you > > think of them. Give us > > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift > > Certificates! Click to find out > > > more > > > > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Web-erp-users mailing list > > > Web...@li... > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-users > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide > > on ITManagersJournal > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you > > think of them. Give us > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! > > Click to find out more > > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > _______________________________________________ > > Web-erp-users mailing list > > Web...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-users > > > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > 150万曲MP3疯狂搜，带您闯入音乐殿堂 > http://cn.rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tag/yisou/music/*http://music.yisou.com/ > 美女明星应有尽有，搜遍美图、艳图和酷图 > http://cn.rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tag/yisou/image/*http://image.yisou.com > 1G就是1000兆，雅虎电邮自助扩容！ > http://cn.rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tag/1g/*http://cn.mail.yahoo.com/event/mail_1g/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-users mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-users |
|
From: skaill <sk...@ro...> - 2004-10-17 19:32:40
|
I didn't say different or disagree. I am just saying that it could be =
expanded to include the current priorities so that people know more =
about what's going on now. There are issues we are doing that they =
could assume have not been considered such as Multilanguage. There are =
also other issues which we have deemed important but have not been =
approached and are not on the list.
Steve
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Daintrees=20
To: web...@li...=20
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Doc Manager
These items in this list are still to do and they are still important. =
The GL reporting is still weak, we need work orders. We need a direct =
credit facility for creditor payments. The fact that priorities are =
pushed elsewhere is interesting, but these jobs are still outstanding, I =
agree that because they are old it reflects poorly. However, I think it =
is very important that the functionality not available is also very =
visible. We dont want people investing a lot of time in a system that =
doesn't do what they need. When there is a lot of functionality now in =
the system it is easier to look at what is not available from a =
manager's perspective.=20
I realise this is counter to traditional marketing theory. However, we =
really should value people's time and this is a quick way for them to =
see if they can live with the stuff lacking.
Phil
----- Original Message -----=20
From: skaill=20
To: web...@li...=20
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 3:58 AM
Subject: Fw: [Web-erp-developers] Doc Manager
Or possibly not old but doesn't seem to show the priority items we =
are currently working on.
Steve
----- Original Message -----=20
From: skaill=20
To: web...@li...=20
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 10:55 AM
Subject: [Web-erp-developers] Doc Manager
Phil, in the Doc Manger on our Sourceforge area there is a very old =
document called WEB-ERP Project To Do. Might want to eliminate it or =
put a new one up there. That one will give the impression that web-erp =
can't do anything yet instead of the robust system it has become.
Steve |
|
From: Daintrees <p.d...@pa...> - 2004-10-17 19:04:40
|
These items in this list are still to do and they are still important. = The GL reporting is still weak, we need work orders. We need a direct = credit facility for creditor payments. The fact that priorities are = pushed elsewhere is interesting, but these jobs are still outstanding, I = agree that because they are old it reflects poorly. However, I think it = is very important that the functionality not available is also very = visible. We dont want people investing a lot of time in a system that = doesn't do what they need. When there is a lot of functionality now in = the system it is easier to look at what is not available from a = manager's perspective.=20 I realise this is counter to traditional marketing theory. However, we = really should value people's time and this is a quick way for them to = see if they can live with the stuff lacking. Phil ----- Original Message -----=20 From: skaill=20 To: web...@li...=20 Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 3:58 AM Subject: Fw: [Web-erp-developers] Doc Manager Or possibly not old but doesn't seem to show the priority items we are = currently working on. Steve ----- Original Message -----=20 From: skaill=20 To: web...@li...=20 Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 10:55 AM Subject: [Web-erp-developers] Doc Manager Phil, in the Doc Manger on our Sourceforge area there is a very old = document called WEB-ERP Project To Do. Might want to eliminate it or = put a new one up there. That one will give the impression that web-erp = can't do anything yet instead of the robust system it has become. Steve |
|
From: skaill <sk...@ro...> - 2004-10-17 14:57:02
|
Or possibly not old but doesn't seem to show the priority items we are = currently working on. Steve ----- Original Message -----=20 From: skaill=20 To: web...@li...=20 Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 10:55 AM Subject: [Web-erp-developers] Doc Manager Phil, in the Doc Manger on our Sourceforge area there is a very old = document called WEB-ERP Project To Do. Might want to eliminate it or = put a new one up there. That one will give the impression that web-erp = can't do anything yet instead of the robust system it has become. Steve |
|
From: skaill <sk...@ro...> - 2004-10-17 14:53:49
|
Phil, in the Doc Manger on our Sourceforge area there is a very old = document called WEB-ERP Project To Do. Might want to eliminate it or = put a new one up there. That one will give the impression that web-erp = can't do anything yet instead of the robust system it has become. Steve |
|
From: Phil D. <we...@pa...> - 2004-10-17 05:47:50
|
More committment to CVS. PurchData.php Steve ReverseGRN.php Steve PDFBankingSummary.php Phil PDFChequeListing.php Phil SalesGLPostings.php Phil SalesPeople.php Phil SalesTypes.php Phil -- Phil |
|
From: Phil D. <we...@pa...> - 2004-10-16 07:15:51
|
Committed - PurchData.php - Steve Also the long elusive pdf small boxes bug - thanks Chris - my machines all have register globals=off so I never had it anyway - but if someone could check this is now ok that would be good. Also the StockAdjustments <TD bug - thanks Steve Will get me some gettextification going tomorrow too. -- Phil |
|
From: Phil D. <we...@pa...> - 2004-10-16 06:51:33
|
Thanks ... Fixed! Phil On Saturday 16 October 2004 05:41, skaill wrote: > There's an error in the line right below the Adjustment Quantity label. > I've found some browsers resolve errors better than others. > > echo '<TD'; > > Guess it could be that... > > Steve |
|
From: Chris B. <cb...@en...> - 2004-10-16 03:32:41
|
I really like this email. Since I do a lot of customizations to some of the core scripts, I cannot just perform a cvs update within the directory. When I know what bug fixes have been changed to what scripts I can update a Core repository here and add those changes in. Once again. Thank you for this email phil. Chris -----Original Message----- From: web...@li... [mailto:web...@li...] On Behalf Of Phil Daintree Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 4:15 PM To: web...@li... Subject: [Web-erp-developers] Tonights commitment Gettextified Prices.php - Steve Prices_Customer.php - Steve Gettextified PDFCustomerList.php - Jesse PDFPriceList.php - Jesse, PDFStockCheckComparison.php - Jesse, PDFStockLocTransfer.php - Jesse and associated pageheader includes Bug fixes GLTransInquiry.php Steve - $rootpath in single quotes, $title above include session.inc Bug fixes DateFunctions.inc, SQL_CommonFunctions.inc Jesse - proper use of DB_query, prnMsg Jesse - I have marked the following scripts as yours: PrintCustOrder.php PrintCustOrder_generic.php PrintCustStatements.php PO_OrderDetails.php PO_PDFPurchOrder.php To recap - I have the following outstanding allocated scripts: CreditStatus.php Luca Currencies.php Luca CustEDISetup.php Rom CustWhereAlloc.php Rom CustomerAllocations.php Rom CustomerBranches.php Rom CustomerInquiry.php Rom DeliveryDetails.php Hani DiscountCategories.php Victor DiscountMatrix.php Victor Help.php Jake InventoryPlanning.php Jake PO_OrderDetails.php Jesse PO_PDFPurchOrder.php Jesse PrintCustOrder.php Jesse PrintCustOrder_generic.php Jesse PrintCustStatements.php Jesse PurchData.php Steve ReverseGRN.php Steve SalesAnalReptCols.php Steve -- Phil ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Web-erp-developers mailing list Web...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers |
|
From: Stins, D. <DR...@Zi...> - 2004-10-15 23:17:53
|
It would be nice to be able to turn those confirmation "are you sure" off, because they can cause a lot of irritation when you do not like them. With best regards, Dick Stins ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daintrees" <p.d...@pa...> To: <web...@li...> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 6:56 AM Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] Confirmation Pages & Ease of Use > This is good stuff and of course it all seems abundantly clear to me as it > is .... this new perspective is really good. I am very keen to explore > improvements to these areas. > There is a lot to work on - I suspect it will never end.... its just that > its hard to see past the multi-language mountain and we could easily take on > too much too soon. > > Multi-language first? > > Phil > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jesse Peterson" <je...@st...> > To: <web...@li...> > Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 8:59 AM > Subject: [Web-erp-developers] Confirmation Pages & Ease of Use > > > > >From the list the last few days, and from my experience working with > > >weberp, it seems it would be good to have more Confirmation pages... such > > >that when you, for example, click 'Process Credit Note', the next step is > > >an "are you sure?" that displays the credit note info and possibly extra > > >things like GL postings as applicable that will be done when you click > > >Process. > > > > Verifying everything thing will take a while to make sure it is done, but > > I think we could easily come up with a top 10 or top 5 scripts that would > > make things much easier for folks - Invoicing, Purchase Orders, credit > > notes, reverse grns ... > > > > A couple other things I think we should consider updating: > > * Make it easier to tell what various buttons do or are taking you. For > > example, when creating an Invoice, I can't tell you how many times in > > DeliveryDetails.php that I have click 'Modify Order Lines' instead of > > 'Commit Changes'. A side by side display with some arrows, even "<--" and > > "-->" would help, I think. There are several places this could be fixed > > (some of the same list above) > > > > * Make Searches easier - like on all, make it easy to just list everything > > if that's what somebody wants... maybe even default to showing everything > > with Paging enabled. Default Search options may also be something to make > > a User Pref. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > jesse > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out > > more > > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > > _______________________________________________ > > Web-erp-developers mailing list > > Web...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > Web-erp-developers mailing list > Web...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/web-erp-developers |
|
From: Daintrees <p.d...@pa...> - 2004-10-15 18:35:55
|
Chris and I had a Skype text discussion on this yesterday and we thought =
replacing the $_SESSION['PageSize'] with $_SESSION['DefaultPageSize'] =
was the least pain fix. I have already done this in my development =
version - although I don't think I committed it yet. There are only two =
scripts to fix session.inc and PDFStarter_ros.inc
The difficulty with changing the $PageSize variable is that every PDF =
script would then have to change - there's quite a few of those.
Phil
----- Original Message -----=20
From: skaill=20
To: web...@li...=20
Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2004 1:06 AM
Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] PDFOrderStatus.php
Change the lines at 112 and 113 ...
$PageSize =3D array(0,0,$Page_Width,$Page_Height);
$pdf =3D & new Cpdf($PageSize);
to
$PDFPageSize =3D array(0,0,$Page_Width,$Page_Height);
$pdf =3D & new Cpdf($PDFPageSize);
Basically change $PageSize to $PDFPageSize in these two lines. This =
assumes the pdf class does not change PageSize which I'm fairly =
confident is the case.
Also, the switch assumes that $PageSize is always set with a legal =
value. If it's possible for it not to be then there should be a default =
case that will ensure the variables such as $Page_Width are set.
The isset test and setting of $PageSize should be left as is to ensure =
it is set the same as $_SESSION['PageSize'] for all versions and =
settings. Especially php 4.2.3!
Steve
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Chris Bice=20
To: web...@li...=20
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 3:47 PM
Subject: RE: [Web-erp-developers] PDFOrderStatus.php
Well its quite simple, odd, but simple.
=20
PDFStarter_ros.inc:
Lines 25 - 27:
=20
if (!isset($PageSize)){
$PageSize =3D $_SESSION['PageSize'];
}
=20
Basically, if you have not set the $PageSize Variable, it sets it to =
your session variable. Which is fine the First time you print it. But =
because of the following line 112:
=20
$PageSize =3D array(0,0,$Page_Width,$Page_Height);
=20
At this point, with RegisterGlobals on, it assumes $PageSize is the =
same as $_SESSION[PageSize]. So when you set $PageSize to an array, it =
throws off the whole equation, because earlier you are expecting a =
String like "Letter" or "A4" or something to that effect.
=20
Does that make sense??
=20
-----Original Message-----
From: web...@li... =
[mailto:web...@li...] On Behalf Of =
Daintrees
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 2:04 PM
To: web...@li...
Subject: Re: [Web-erp-developers] PDFOrderStatus.php
=20
I am not sure I understand this snag. I thought we could run with =
register globals on or off.
I need some help here Chris. I have come accross this complaint =
about the small PDF box before - but I don't understand why.
=20
Phil
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Chris Bice=20
To: web...@li...=20
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 3:16 AM
Subject: RE: [Web-erp-developers] PDFOrderStatus.php
=20
Ok. I found the issue. If you happen to have Register_Globals =
=3D On in your PHP.INI file, within the PDFStarter_ros.inc file, around =
line 112, it sets your $_SESSION[PageSize] from a string to an array. =
Does it say anywhere in the installation, that you will need to be =
required to have globals turned off?? If So, is there a way to operate =
with Globals turned on? Looking for Compatibility Issues here .
=20
Chris
=20
-----Original Message-----
From: web...@li... =
[mailto:web...@li...] On Behalf Of =
Chris Bice
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 9:00 AM
To: web...@li...
Subject: [Web-erp-developers] PDFOrderStatus.php
=20
The First Time I ran this I got the report, a 14 Page PDF File =
that looks outstanding. Great work for whoever created it. But when I =
try to print it out again, no matter what I do I get this tiny blank =
page in Acrobat Reader. Any Idea's as to what is going on? At first I =
thought maybe it was a session error, but the more I think about it the =
more I doubt that theory.
|
|
From: skaill <sk...@ro...> - 2004-10-15 16:43:35
|
There's an error in the line right below the Adjustment Quantity label. = I've found some browsers resolve errors better than others. echo '<TD'; Guess it could be that... Steve ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Chris Bice=20 To: web...@li...=20 Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 11:26 AM Subject: [Web-erp-developers] StockAdjustments.php Ok, I have a weird error. When I use Internet Explorer on this = script, the Quantity label does not appear. So you cannot make an = adjustment. If I use FireFox, or Mozilla, it shows up. Anyone know = whats going on here?? =20 Chris |
231 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
