|
From: Phil D. <we...@pa...> - 2005-11-04 09:33:27
|
> That does bring up a couple other questions, what is the negative record > in the stockmoves table used for? Reporting? Not sure what you mean here? > And why do you leave a > record in the stockserialitems table for serialized inventory with a > zero quantity? To show that the item once existed in stock. > > > Personally I am a big fan of standard costing because: > > I've read up on it a bit. Seems like it would be ok for a smallish, > slow moving inventory. Even with only a few thousand items, which might > be small in some regards, standard costing seems like it would be > tedious to maintain. Especially in a quickly changing market where > supplier prices can be different from week to week. I will use the > disclaimer that these are observations from someone who has never used > standard costing. > > Regardless, I don't want this to become a discussion about the merits of > one costing system over another. If I implement webERP, I need FIFO > valuation so I will add it. Or average cost? The valuation reporting is one aspect and perhaps the easier aspect to consider the real interest is in creating a completely consistent general ledger posting schema that works using the costing method chosen - we are talking about every stock journal in the system - they are all over the place and amongst the more complex aspects of the logic. Its not going to be that easy to do. > I just want to decide the best way to do it > with the idea to give it back to the project if it is deemed worthwhile. > > -andy > Certainly would be useful to many I suspect. All contributions most gratefully received ;-) Phil |