[Vxl-users] vtol library evolution

[Kelliher, T. P (Research) <kel...@cr...>]

For the short term moving intensity_face to vdgl is probably the right move. We had a discussion here
this week about the desire to get a set of libraries that could become general use and migrate into
the core. One consideration was merging vtol/vsol into a single library, vdgl could also be included.
This makes a somewhat larger library but puts all of these tighly related classes together.

-tim
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Vanroose [mailto:Pet...@es...]
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 12:25 PM
To: vxl...@li...
Cc: vxl...@li...
Subject: [Vxl-users] Re: [Vxl-commit] CVS: vxl/gel/vdgl
CMakeListsLink.txt,1.5,1.6


Luis Galup wrote:

> removed inclusion of vtol/CMakeListLink file.
> why? because cmake was seg faulting, due to a circular include
> dependency. this seemed to remove it. for linux. LEG

We'll have to do something more fundamentally at this circular dependency.
I.e., avoid it altogether.  We have been suffering for a very long time
with TargetJr's circular dependency between DigitalGeometry and Topology,
which never got cleared out.

So the question is now: design a set of libraries, with linear dependency,
and decide what goes where.  Any takers?

(For the problem at hand, it is probably sufficient to move
 vdgl_intensity_face to vtol; would that be acceptable for everybody?)


	Peter.


_______________________________________________________________

Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: ban...@so...
_______________________________________________
Vxl-users mailing list
Vxl...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vxl-users