From: Brendan M. <bre...@gm...> - 2008-08-14 21:56:20
|
I vote for subversion too. 2008/8/14 Ian Scott <ian...@st...>: > Wheeler, Frederick W (GE, Research) wrote: >>> Would this also be a good moment to rename vidl to vild1 (as >>> we did with vil/vil2/vil1) ? >>> Is core/vidl still actively being used anymore, or is vidl2 >>> "the" replacement for it? >> >> It might be easier to rename vidl to vidl1 after the switch to >> subversion, which allows file moving and renaming. > > Definitely wait for subversion (if everyone agrees) before attempting > moves or renames. It was a real pain to rename vil->vil1 and vil2->vil, > and still maintain history in CVS. > > Ian. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Vxl-maintainers mailing list > Vxl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vxl-maintainers > -- Cheers, Brendan |