From: Andrew N. <and...@vi...> - 2008-03-31 23:14:14
|
Wayne - I wasn't sure where you were with this. I created a file in the import directory called "marcmap.xml" - it was my initial idea. Feel free to add/edit/delete. Andrew From: vuf...@li... [mailto:vuf...@li...] On Behalf Of Wayne Graham Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 6:57 PM To: Alan Rykhus Cc: vuf...@li... Subject: Re: [VuFind-General] MARC tags As soon as I finish up another project, I'm going to start working on a mapping system that will allow you to map marc fields (and appropriate subfields) to the fields in the Solr schema in XML. There's some preliminary work being done at UVa with their Blacklight project which we've been collaborating on. The schema will be quite similar to what was written for the marc4j-lucene api, but with Solr terminology and connections. If you'd like to help, let me know and I can send you some more info. Cheers, Wayne On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Alan Rykhus <ala...@mn...<mailto:ala...@mn...>> wrote: Hello, I'm very interested in the SOLR schema and how the MARC tags are mapped to individual indexes. I started using Solr with the fac-back-opac implementation and did quite a bit of work on our site redoing the schema and mapping the MARC tags to the schema. I realized I would have to rewrite the Python parser to get what I would like for functionality. I then looked at the VUFind implementation and decided to work with this instead. I figure if I have to rewrite a parser, I might as well get the added functionality you already have in VUFind. Since I have not seen anything about this on the list, I would like to start the conversation. I have been looking at the java code and can see how things are implemented. One thing our consortia has asked for is a more detailed indexing, a lot of additional fields that were not indexed in fac-back-opac and are not indexed in VUFind. The additional comment I could make is that it looks like the schema is indexing all fields. I had set up 4 keyword indexes, as well as a number of string fields that are used mostly for facets. (I sometimes think that I have too many facets.) I also stored a number of fields without indexing them. These fields were stored for display purposes, most of the time I used a copyField line to index them in one of the 4 keyword indexes. What is the plan for the new setup and how can I help? thanks -- al -- Alan Rykhus PALS, A Program of the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities (507)389-1975 ala...@mn...<mailto:ala...@mn...> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ VuFind-General mailing list VuF...@li...<mailto:VuF...@li...> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vufind-general |