vim-latex-devel — Mailing list for developers/maintainers of the vim-latex project

[Vim-latex-devel] folding in latex-suite

[Srinath A. <sr...@fa...>]

Hello...

As you might know, Zhang Linbo has added quite a bit of new
functionality to the folding scheme in latex-suite. Now we can customize
various things to fold etc. Unfortunately, we also uncovered what seemed
to be a few "unfixable" problems. (or at least very hard to fix using the
current methods). The problem arises from the fact that we use
a simplified syntax folding algorithm implemented in SyntaxFolds.vim to
generate the folds. Although the algorithm can handle a fair amount of
complexities like folds being nested etc, it fails in some common cases.

One problem arises when we try to fold commands. The problem case is to
fold something like:

\footnote{This is a footnote with
\textbf{\texttt{arbitrarily nested}} commands
within it}

The problem with this set of lines is that there are commands which are
arbitrarily nested and the way the inner commands terminate is the same
as the way the outer footnote terminates (all commands terminate with
a '}'). Other problems arise when we attempt to fold \item's which might
have figures in them. In the present scheme we will not be able to fold
\begin{figures} environments nested inside \items... (wonder why no one
reported this...)

In the long term (quite long), we might therefore need to move to using
vim's native syntax folding capabilities which are able to handle all
these issues. Ofcourse, the present way seems to be more than adequate
for most if not all users (no?)

I spent some time today learning about vim's syntax scheme... (quite
complex too...)

Here's a little demo of what can be done without syntaxfolds.vim.

Open the attached .tex file and then source the attached .vim file. This
should create some of the necessary syntax folds... Its still a /huge/
hack and doesn't fold any sections like latex-suite does, but it does
show how relatively simply we can get around the afore-mentioned
problems...

Ofcourse, even if we do use vim's syntax folding instead of
syntaxFolds.vim, folding.vim will not change. (LB, your patches will not
be in vain :-)). What will need to change is the interface between
folding.vim and syntaxFolds.vim. Basically SyntaxFolds.vim will
essentially contain a simple wrapper function which will call vim's :syn
command with various parameters.

The reason for this e-mail is to hopefully spark some interest in
someone to take a further look at things in this direction...

Srinath

PS: Please reply to the list so everyone is in the loop.

Re: [Vim-latex-devel] SPAM again

[Florent M. <ma...@ef...>]

On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 04:01:56PM +0100, Srinath Avadhanula wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Preben Randhol wrote:
> > Can you please reconsider? Make a form on your web-page that people
> > can
> > fill out if they have problems. Then this result can be mailed to a
> > moderator before inclusion in the mailinglist. It isn't hard and it
> > would save the rest of us a lot of very annoying spam.
> I would _really_ welcome the suggestion if someone agrees to moderate.
> I unfortunately, have no time or inclination for doing this. I am
> already swamped with too many things to do to take something as
> tedious
> as this upon myself. If you wish, you could moderate :-)
> (seriously...)

I can do it if you need.

> Quite frankly though, I would suggest setting up some good anti-spam
> software on your system... I am seriously thinking of setting up
> spambayes myself, but again, haven't had time...

With spamassassin, i never get spam from this list

--
Florent Manens             EFREI               Promo - 2003
ma...@ef...

Re: [Vim-latex-devel] SPAM again

[Srinath A. <sr...@fa...>]

On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Preben Randhol wrote:

> How many post exactly do you get from people that are not in the list?
> I don't buy this argument. It seems to me that the only purpose this
> policy servers is to allow a bunch of spam messages to get in.
>
Actually, a _lot_ of very useful e-mail to the list comes from people
not subscribed. For example, recently there were quite a lof of new very
useful features added to the folding scheme... I think you might have
noticed a few e-mails between Zhang Linbo and myself regarding this.
Linbo is not subscribed to the list... But he has written some
extremeley helpful e-mails including submitting patches etc. So has Alex
Jakushev... again very helpful e-mails which include helpful patches...
These are just examples from the last week or so. In general I do find
that lots of non-subscribers write useful emails to the list. Even when
they do not submit patches, 95% of the people who submit bug reports are
not subscribed... I would hate to create a barrier of entry for them
since that would mean that the vim-latex developement would suffer.

> Can you please reconsider? Make a form on your web-page that people can
> fill out if they have problems. Then this result can be mailed to a
> moderator before inclusion in the mailinglist. It isn't hard and it
> would save the rest of us a lot of very annoying spam.

I would _really_ welcome the suggestion if someone agrees to moderate.
I unfortunately, have no time or inclination for doing this. I am
already swamped with too many things to do to take something as tedious
as this upon myself. If you wish, you could moderate :-) (seriously...)

Quite frankly though, I would suggest setting up some good anti-spam
software on your system... I am seriously thinking of setting up
spambayes myself, but again, haven't had time...

Sorry about the pain, I feel it every day... :(

Srinath

[Vim-latex-devel] SPAM again

[Preben R. <ra...@pv...>]

How many post exactly do you get from people that are not in the list? I
don't buy this argument. It seems to me that the only purpose this
policy servers is to allow a bunch of spam messages to get in.

Can you please reconsider? Make a form on your web-page that people can
fill out if they have problems. Then this result can be mailed to a
moderator before inclusion in the mailinglist. It isn't hard and it
would save the rest of us a lot of very annoying spam.

Preben
-- 
"Saving keystrokes is the job of the text editor, not the programming
 language."

[Vim-latex-devel] Error in documentation

[Alex J. <Ale...@ke...>]
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[Vim-latex-devel] =?GB2312?B?s8/Qxbf+zvGjrMirufrK17zSzcaz9r/J0tTD4rfRz8jX9s341b6joQ==?=

[<xm...@to...>]

老朋友：

　　您好，很高兴能为您服务！
   
　　如果您或您的企业想做网站，给我们个机会，绝对让您满意！！！

我司服务项目：网页制作、域名注册、虚拟主机、网站推广、通用网址等；

服务优势：域名注册只收取手续费，虚拟主机租用特惠价；
　　　　　企业及个人均可申请成为我们的代理，获取更大优惠；
          专业网站优惠价制作，精诚打造实力网站，为您节省每一分钱；

特别说明：对于信誉好的企业需要做网站的我司可以不收一分钱先给予做好，
　　　　　满意后再收费。

"高速、稳定、安全、24小时专业服务"是全体恒速达人的服务宗旨，我们郑重承诺：
     1、恒速达主机全部采用最新原装Dell PowerApp互联网应用服务器；
     2、光纤直接接入，主机独享 100M 带宽，同时托管于网通与电信；
     3、恒速达主机全部安装正版Turbolinux或Microsoft操作系统；
     4、采用世界标准的SNMP进行24x7x365 系统监测；
     5、恒速达主机客户一个月内可无条件全额退款；其它按实际余额退款。

虚拟主机我司所推出的套餐组合有以下几种优惠：
  
 1、100M（纯HTML空间）+ 送一国际域名，仅售150元/年
 2、50M空间+50M企业邮局 + 功能全面支持并送一国际域名，仅售248元/年
 3、100MP空间+100M企业邮局 + 功能全面支持并送一国际域名，仅售280元/年 
 4、200MP空间+200M企业邮局 + 功能全面支持并送一国际域名，仅售330元/年

我们承诺24小时为您服务！
  咨询电话:　0592-6026652　/　8667174 / 8345012 / 8919334　/　8375020
  　QQ专线:　40327558 /　13531412　/　33925614
　咨询邮箱:　zz...@to...　
  　
祝: 好运天天有、幸运常伴随!!!
                         
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　恒速达网络

[Vim-latex-devel] \ls mapping does not work

[Alex J. <Ale...@ke...>]

DQpWaW02LjIsIFdpblhQLCBNaWtUZXgsIHZpbS1sYXRleCAyMDAzMTIwMQ0KDQpcbHMgbWFw
IGRpZG4ndCB3b3JrIGZvciBtZS4gSG93ZXZlciwgSSBjaGFuZ2VkDQoNCmluIGNvbXBpbGVy
LnZpbSwgbGluZSA3NDgsIA0KDQpjYWxsIFRleF9NYWtlTWFwKHM6bWwuImxzIiwgIjxQbHVn
PlRleF9Gb3J3YXJkU2VhcmNoIiwgJ2xzJywgJzxidWZmZXI+JykNCg0KdG8NCg0KY2FsbCBU
ZXhfTWFrZU1hcChzOm1sLiJscyIsICI8UGx1Zz5UZXhfRm9yd2FyZFNlYXJjaCIsICduJywg
JzxidWZmZXI+JykNCg0KQW5kIHRoaW5nIHdvcmtzIE9LIG5vdy4gIA0KDQpCZXN0IHJlZ2Fy
ZHMsDQoNCkFsZXggSi4NCg0KLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t
LS0tIA0KQWxleCBKYWt1c2hldiwgICAgICAgICAgICAoIG1haWx0bzpBbGV4Lkpha3VzaGV2
QGtlbWVrLmx0ICkNClByb2dyYW1tZXIsDQoNCiJLRU1FSyBFbGVrdHJvbmlrYSIgVUFCICAg
KCBodHRwOi8vd3d3LmtlbWVrLmx0ICkNCm1lbWJlciBvZiBWQVJPUyBHUk9VUCAgICAgKCBo
dHRwOi8vd3d3LnZhcm9zZ3JvdXAuY29tICkNCg0KV29yayAgOiArMzcwIDUgMjQ5MTAyNA0K
RmF4ICAgOiArMzcwIDUgMjQ5MTAxOQ0KTW9iLiAgOiArMzcwIDY4NSA0NDg4NQ0KSUNRICAg
OiA4MTQ5NTY0Mg0K

[Vim-latex-devel] [ vim-latex-Bugs-852463 ] VIM complains on bad concatenation

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Bugs item #852463, was opened at 2003-12-02 00:54
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=466456&aid=852463&group_id=52322

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: VIM complains on bad concatenation

Initial Comment:
I use VIM on Win32, miktex, vim-latex 2003.12.01

VIM was complaining when I tried to use \lv

The problem is that it didn't like the line 

let execString = '!start' s:viewer mainfname . '.' . s:target

in compiler.vim, line 270

When I changed it to 

let execString = '!start ' . s:viewer . ' ' . mainfname . '.' . s:target

Everything became fine.

Maybe there's something with my settings, but I think that concatenation with dots is more common form.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=466456&aid=852463&group_id=52322

[Vim-latex-devel] Re: A bug in templates.vim

[Srinath A. <sr...@fa...>]

Hey LB,

It looks like there was a problem sending this e-mail... It might have
got cut off halfway through or something...

Could you please resend it to me... Also, from now on, please reply or
send any diffs just to me, not to the vim-latex-devel group, since
I apply the patches anyway.

Thanks,
Srinath

On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Zhang Linbo wrote:

> Hi, Srinath,
>
> I'm sorry there're still some bugs in folding.vim,
> please see attached diff (it should be applied
> after the one I have just sent out).
>
> I think that the current code for the g:Taaazzzaaazzzaaazzzaaazzzaaazzz
>

[Vim-latex-devel] Re: A bug in templates.vim

[Zhang L. <zl...@ls...>]

Hi, Srinath,

I'm sorry there're still some bugs in folding.vim,
please see attached diff (it should be applied
after the one I have just sent out).

I think that the current code for the g:Tex_FoldedCommands
list should be modified. For example, if we have a complete
\footnote command on a single line, then all lines following
it will be folded. I don't know how to define a proper pattern
to skip commands on a single line :-(

Another thing: I don't know what the 'TexLet' command
is for, maybe should we change 'let' in folding.vim to
'TexLet'?

Best,
LB

[Vim-latex-devel] Re: A bug in templates.vim

[Zhang L. <zl...@ls...>]

Srinath Avadhanula wrote:

>Hi LB,
>
>I just made a few changes to folding.vim... The patch seems to not work
>with the latest CVS... Could I ask you to resubmit it against the latest
>CVS? No problem if you cannot. I will then do it manually later...
>
>  
>
Here are the patches against newest CVS. Hope they'll
work ;-)

Best,
LB

[Vim-latex-devel] Re: A bug in templates.vim

[Srinath A. <sr...@fa...>]

Hi LB,

On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Zhang Linbo wrote:

> Hi, Srinath,
>
> I have found another two small bugs in folding.vim,
> attached are the patches against current CVS.
>

I just made a few changes to folding.vim... The patch seems to not work
with the latest CVS... Could I ask you to resubmit it against the latest
CVS? No problem if you cannot. I will then do it manually later...

Thanks,
Srinath

[Vim-latex-devel] Re: A bug in templates.vim

[Zhang L. <zl...@ls...>]

Hi, Srinath,

I have found another two small bugs in folding.vim,
attached are the patches against current CVS.

1. '\item' should be put before the Environments (it might
appear within a folded environment).

2. The '~' was missing in the test:
       if g:Tex_FoldedMisc =~ '\(^\|,\)<<<\(,\|$\)'

Best,
LB

Re: [Vim-latex-devel] strange error with <mapleader>ll

[Srinath A. <sr...@fa...>]

This was a concious decision on my part. It seemed to be useful to make
the user see the messages like:

"re-running to get cross-references right"

etc... Therefore \ll does not use silent! whereas the menu thing
apparently does... For now you could put something like this in your
~/.vim/after/ftplugin/tex.vim file (note its ~/.vim/after not just
~/.vim):

nnoremal <leader>ll :silent! call RunLaTeX()

NOTE: From recent versions RunLaTeX has been renamed to Tex_RunLaTeX()

On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Bj=F6rn Michaelsen wrote:

> not finding error pattern anywhere in quickfix window :
> not finding error pattern anywhere in quickfix window :

Actually, now that I think of it, it might be possible to supress this
message without resorting to silent!... Maybe I will see why this
message is being generated...

> BTW vim-latex is now in gentoos portage (unstable), see
> http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=3Dlatexsuite
> (Hopefully bumped to version 1.5 when you take a look ;-) )

Excellent! Thanks for doing this... BTW, I have been updating version
1.5 and backporting bug-fixes to the branch... There have been several
bug-fixes since 1.5-rc1.

Thanks,
Srinath

Re: [Vim-latex-devel] vim-latex not compiling tex files

[Srinath A. <sr...@fa...>]

Hmmm... Everything seems okay! I wonder if you do not have latex
installed properly or something.

On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:

> If I do
> :call RunLaTeX()
>
> the output is
> Ran latex 1 time(s)

This tells that the system got to the correct place in the code...

What happens if you simply do the following:

with the 'makeprg' set as above, try doing

:make %

Try to see if the shell command which is spawned has any errors. If
possible, just issue the same command manually from the command line.
I am pretty sure that its just a matter of vim not finding the latex
command or something similar. You might need to set the $PATH variable
or something...

> I tried compiling with the following line in the .vimrc
>
> let g:Tex_CompileRule_dvi = 'latex --src-special \\\\nonstopmode
> \\\\input\\{$*\\}'

Also try:

let g:Tex_CompileRule_dvi = 'latex --src-special --interaction=nonstopmode $*'


Srinath

[Vim-latex-devel] Re: A bug in templates.vim

[Zhang L. <zl...@ls...>]

Srinath Avadhanula wrote:

>Hi LB,
>
>Thanks very much for the patches. I really like them :) I have been
>meaning to have customization of the folding stuff for ages. I have
>added the new stuff into the latest CVS head. 
>  
>
Thanks for sorting out the code and I'm glad that you like it ;-)

> Its pretty late right now, so I will put off making the developement
>
>release till tomorrow. In the meanwhile, please checkout the latest from
>CVS and see if every thing is okay.
>  
>
I have moved the processing of the 'title' command before other
standard commands/environments, otherwise it might be obsoleted
by the 'titlepage' environment. The patch file is attached.

This item might not be appropriate for all users because
the \title and \maketitle commands are not always together,
e.g., some people like to put the \title, \author, etc.,
commands in the preamble. So we might need to delete it from the
default list.

>Ofcourse, a big TODO is writing up documentation for this... I will do
>it if you feel you have already done too much :)
>
>  
>
It's little work compared to what you have done ;-) But please do
write the documentation since I have never worked with the xml
stuffs, and my english is not as good as well ;-(

Another improvement I'm thinking of is to allow some kind of
wildcards in the syntax match patterns. E.g., we can say:
    startpat='\s*\\begin\zs[:alpha:]*\ze'
    endpat='\s*\\end\zs[:alpha:]*\ze',
('\zs...\ze' in endpat is replaced by the actual matchstr
when searching for the end pattern) to fold all
'\beginxxxx ... \endxxxx' pairs, and:
    let g:TexFoldedEnvironments = '\zs[:alpha:]*\ze'
to fold all environments.

Also it would be nice if lines between '\begin{verbatim' and
'\end{verbatim' can be skipped when searching for start/end
patterns.

I won't try the above enhancements until I have enough free time
(I still have a lot to learn with Vim's scripting language in
order to understand your MakeSyntaxFolds() function ;-) - It should
be much easier for you to do them when you have time :-) )

Best,
LB

[Vim-latex-devel] STOP-PAYING For Your PAY-PER-VIEW, Movie Channels, Mature Channels...conrad

[Diann P. <syp...@ya...>]

Cable TV Subscribers

Get Our Cable TV Filter and Stop-Paying For Your Pay-Per-View, Mature Chan=
nels, Movie Channels, Sporting Events...


Find Out More - www.esavingsplus.com?refid=3D10010000859429816


Don't worry, it's perfectly-legal.  


Check out our legal page on the site: www.esavingsplus.com?refid=3D1001000=
0859429816







No more advertisments -  http://www.esavingsplus.com?unsub=3D1001000085942=
9816

























nxxojr xmet nfvq
fppy jiersa 

[Vim-latex-devel] Re: A bug in templates.vim

[Srinath A. <sr...@fa...>]

Hi LB,

Thanks very much for the patches. I really like them :) I have been
meaning to have customization of the folding stuff for ages. I have
added the new stuff into the latest CVS head. I do not think I will
backport it to the 1.5 branch, because that has gone into
a feature-freeze. It will ofcourse be a part of the "Latest Developement
Version" on the vim-latex download page.

On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Zhang Linbo wrote:

> in which the user defined g:Tex_Foldedxxxxx lists
> are appended (respectively prepended) to the default
> lists, if they start (respectively end) with
> ',', otherwise they replace the default value.

Thats pretty neat.

Its pretty late right now, so I will put off making the developement
release till tomorrow. In the meanwhile, please checkout the latest from
CVS and see if every thing is okay.

Ofcourse, a big TODO is writing up documentation for this... I will do
it if you feel you have already done too much :)

Thanks,
Srinath

[Vim-latex-devel] Re: A bug in templates.vim

[Zhang L. <zl...@ls...>]

Hi, Srinath,

I'm sorry that I have modified folding.vim again
in which the user defined g:Tex_Foldedxxxxx lists
are appended (respectively prepended) to the default
lists, if they start (respectively end) with
',', otherwise they replace the default value.
I think this adds more flexibility for users who
wish to add new environments/commands to be folded
to the default ones.

Attached is the new version of folding.vim.
If you have not looked at the previous ones,
please just look at this one. Thanks.

Best,
LB

[Vim-latex-devel] Re: A bug in templates.vim

[Zhang L. <zl...@ls...>]

Hi again,

I modified the function TexFoldTextFunction() to better display
information about the folded environments. Attached is the new
folding.vim file (this time zipped).

Best,
LB

[Vim-latex-devel] strange error with <mapleader>ll

[M. <P1...@pu...>]

Hi there!

I found a strange bug in latexsuite 1.5:
When I press <mapleader>ll to compile I get a=20
"Ran latex 1 time(s)
not finding error pattern anywhere in quickfix window :
not finding error pattern anywhere in quickfix window :
Hit ENTER or type command to continue"
error. The error does not appear when I use the menu.
It still compiles, so it is a mere annoyance ...

Greetz, Bj=F6rn

BTW vim-latex is now in gentoos portage (unstable), see
http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=3Dlatexsuite
(Hopefully bumped to version 1.5 when you take a look ;-) )
--=20
Bj=F6rn Michaelsen
pub  1024D/C9E5A256 2003-01-21 Bj=F6rn Michaelsen <bmi...@gm...>
   Key fingerprint =3D D649 8C78 1CB1 23CF 5CCF  CA1A C1B5 BBEC C9E5 A256

[Vim-latex-devel] vim-latex not compiling tex files

[Kamaraju K. <kk...@co...>]

Hi all
      I downloaded the vim-latex 1.5 from sourceforge and it is not 
compiling the tex files. When I do \ll no dvi/log/aux files are produced.

The FAQ in vim-latex suggests to provide the following information for 
this problem. Can anyone help me how to get around this problem.

On the command line

:echo Tex_CompileRule_dvi
gives
latex -interaction=nonstopmode \input{$*}


:set makeprg?
makeprg=latex -interaction=nonstopmode \\input\{$*\}

:verbose set makeprg?
makeprg=latex -interaction=nonstopmode \\input\{$*\}
         Last set from /home/raju/.vim/ftplugin/latex-suite/compiler.vim

If I do
:call RunLaTeX()

the output is
Ran latex 1 time(s)

Operating system  : redhat linux 9.0
GNU bash, version : 2.05b.0
Latex version     : TeX (Web2C 7.3.1) 3.14159
kpathsea version  : 3.3.1


I tried compiling with the following line in the .vimrc

let g:Tex_CompileRule_dvi = 'latex --src-special \\\\nonstopmode 
\\\\input\\{$*\\}'

I also tried unsetting SHELL=bash

But this is also of no help.


BTW, The viewing (\lv) and other macros, folding, templates etc seem to 
work fine.

thanks in advance
raju

[Vim-latex-devel] Re: A bug in templates.vim

[Zhang L. <zl...@ls...>]

Hi, Srinath,

I have modified folding.vim (see attachment) to create fold
items based on some lists. Since it is not easy to define a
clean syntax to cover all situations with a single list,
I have created three separate lists for folding environments
(g:Tex_FoldedEnvironments), commands with a single argument 
(g:Tex_FoldedCommands), and sectioning commands
(g:Tex_FoldedSections), respectively. Fold items not falling
into these categories are handled directly as before.

The handling of sectioning commands is implemented using a
recursive function (FoldSections()). The limitation on the
recursion depth shouldn't be a problem because we only have
a limited number of sectioning commands.

I have also added '<<<' and '>>>' as special markers for
users to manually fold a region.

The default settings of these lists are enclosed within
"if exists('g:Tex_Foldedxxxxx') ... endif", thus users
can set their own default values for them in any
startup scripts (like ~/.vimrc). E.g.,
       let g:Tex_FoldedEnvironments = ''
will supress folding of environments.

Please check the code when you have time.

Thanks,
LB

Srinath Avadhanula wrote:

>[I am resending this e-mail because I got a very cryptic mail failed
>message from MAILER-DAEMON@Knoppix...]
>
>Hi LB,
>
>On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Zhang Lin-bo wrote:
>
>  
>
>>In the second patch file, folding-patch, are some
>>enhancements to syntax folding. Most of them are
>>mainly based on my personal taste, please decide
>>on your judgement on whether to incorporate
>>(some of) them into the official releases :-)
>>    
>>
>
>Thanks for the patches... I have been pretty busy nowadays with other
>things, hence the late reply...
>
>I have an idea about folding... It is possible that people have entirely
>different preferences when it comes to the level of folding... So I have
>a suggestion. Why not introduce a setting like g:Tex_FoldedItems which
>will be a comma seperated list of the things which people might want
>folded... And then each of the lines like:
>
>	" {{{ equation/eqnarray
>	call AddSyntaxFoldItem (
>		\ '^\s*\\begin{eq',
>		\ '^\s*\\end{eq',
>		\ 0,
>		\ 0
>		\ )
>	" }}}
>
>can be replaced by
>
>	" {{{ equation/eqnarray
>    if g:Tex_FoldedItems =~ '\<eq\>'
>        call AddSyntaxFoldItem (
>            \ '^\s*\\begin{eq',
>            \ '^\s*\\end{eq',
>            \ 0,
>            \ 0
>            \ )
>     endif
>	" }}}
>
>
>I would be more than happy to include a patch if you take the time to
>make a change along these lines... That way the default setting can
>include only the basic latex and amslatex items as Mikolaj suggests, but
>users can easily extend it using the setting...
>
>Thanks,
>Srinath
>
>  
>

[Vim-latex-devel] Boost Your Car's Gas Mileage 27%+.....alick

[Luis R. <t00...@ya...>]

FUEL SAVER PRO

This revolutionary device Boosts Gas Mileage 27%+ by helping fuel burn bet=
ter using three patented processes from General Motors.
www.bb4n.org/?axel=3D49

PROVEN TECHNOLOGY
A certified U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) laboratory recently=
 completed tests on the new Fuel Saver. The results were astounding! Maste=
r Service, a subsidiary of Ford Motor Company, also conducted extensive em=
issions testing and obtained similar, unheard of results. The achievements=
 of the Fuel Saver is so noteworthy to the environmental community, that C=
ommercial News has featured it as their cover story in their June, 2000 ed=
ition.

Take a test drive Today - www.bb4n.org/?axel=3D49






No more advertisements, thanks - http://www.aqmp.net/out5s/rem2e.asp































jkbcdnchqc
bfg

Re: [Vim-latex-devel] Automatic Changelog?

[Srinath A. <sr...@fa...>]

On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Mikolaj Machowski wrote:

> > I have a general question: (this might be of particular interest to
> > Mikolaj and Artur). Is there any objection to using cvs2cl from now on
> > to generate the Changelog automatically? We would even have a cron job
> > which updates the Changelog every night or something...
>
> urpmi cvs2cl
> ...
>
> Good for me.
> To Artur: Looks like it can deal nicely with branches

Excellent. We seem to be in agreement. A few points to note:

1. Since the Changelog will most probably be used verbatim on the web,
   it will be good to use the 'et' option when writing log
   messages. i.e, spaces not tabs.
   Otherwise, formatting will look funny on browsers.

2. Please try to write with '&tw' set to 78 when writing log messages.
   This will avoid long lines in the Changelog. cvs2cl does not seem to
   handle very long lines well.

Basically, have 'set et tw=78' in your cvs.vim ftplugin

Thanks,
Srinath