Re: [AGG] source code style

[Jim B. <ji...@ch...>]

On 2010-06-24 03:32, John Horigan wrote:
> The boost style looks ok, but I can think of some areas where the
> existing agg style is better, or at least not worse: 1) boost style
> requires class member variables to end in '_', agg begins them with
> 'm_' 2) boost style has opening brackets at the end of the line,
> never on a new line. Agg uses a new line for opening brackets for
> class/struct bodies, names spaces, and function bodies (except for
> one-liner functions in header files).
>
> boost style does not address this issue, but I really like the
> following style: if an if, while, for, or switch header cannot fit in
> one line and must be wrapped then: 1) curly brackets are required for
> the statement body, 2) the opening bracket must start on a new line.

I actually take that even further: unless the entire if/for statement
fits on a single line then I always use curly brackets (and always put
the opening bracket on a new line).

I tried the underscore suffix thing for a while but didn't get on with
it so I'm back to using "m_" now.

- Jim