|
From: Milan M. <mi...@ma...> - 2009-05-09 20:03:32
|
Eugene Lazutkin wrote: > Milan, > > Could you update the archive on your page and make it explicit? OK, so I looked at the files and found out there is even a little bit more liberal licence than MIT - the Public Licence. Each source file states: // Permission to copy, use, modify, sell and distribute this software // is granted provided this copyright notice appears in all copies. // This software is provided "as is" without express or implied // warranty, and with no claim as to its suitability for any purpose. And that's it. It's the same as Agg 2.4 Public Licence and I don't see any point in degrading it to MIT/BSD with wich it is anyway compatible. Is there any problem with the licence for you ? Milan |