From: Gonzenbach M. g. <gon...@zh...> - 2004-04-30 10:16:42
|
Hi folks I'm trying to compile a 2.6.4 UML-Kernel patched with uml-patch-2.6.4-1.b= z2 from http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net. I get everytime the follo= wing error with "make linux ARCH=3Dum": *********************************************************** =20 AS .tmp_kallsyms2.o =20 MAIN arch/um/main.o =20 LD vmlinux =20 CPP arch/um/dyn.lds.s gcc -Wl,-T,arch/um/dyn.lds.s -Wl,-rpath,/lib -Wl,--wrap,malloc -Wl,--wra= p,free -Wl,--wrap,calloc \ =20 -o linux arch/um/main.o vmlinux -L/usr/lib -lutil vmlinux(.text+0x6658): In function `mem_init': : undefined reference to `phys_page' vmlinux(.init.text+0x3a83): In function `kmap_init': : undefined reference to `pte_offset' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [linux] Error 1 dskt6804:/usr/src/linux-2.6.4# ************************************************************* The host system is Debian Sarge (testing) with Kernel 2.6.3 patched with = SKAS. I hope there is someone who can help me. Thanks Martin Content Security by MailMarshal |
From: Carl P. <ca...@bo...> - 2004-04-30 11:42:12
|
Hi, I have installed UML on my SuSE 8.2 box and I'm running a Slackware 8.1 distribution on it. I'd like to just leave it running permenantly and then connect to it on occasion to do some work, just as if it was another real linux box. In order to do this I typically run X windows then run an xterm and in the xterm I do... linux umid=anomuran eth0=tuntap,,,192.168.0.254 ...I see the standard bootup sequence, two or three xterms pop up connecting to the spare virtual terminals, it sets up networking and we're away. I can then effectively "switch off the monitor" (in reality I'm doing this all using Xvnc but the principle is the same). and leave the guest OS running. I can connect to it using "telnet 192.168.0.144", I have samba running on it and can see network shares that it presents, I can ssh to it, etc. This all works fine. I then leave the host box unattended for a few days and try to connect to the UML instance again... the connection attempt doesn't respond. I try pinging the UML guest "machine"... no response. If I "switch on the monitor" on the host box I see the xterms all there as before and the original xterm where linux started. They all look like they did before but are totally unresponsive. I even try "uml_mconsole anomuran", it runs but I cannot do anything. If I type "cad" to initiate a shutdown/reboot the command just hangs in mconsole, I have to use Ctrl-C to get out of mconsole. The same behaviour with "sysrq s" or "sysrq u" or even "sysrq o". There is no particular discernable pattern, no obvious log message on the main xterm, nothing, just a dead UML instance. On the host machine a "ps axf" shows the linux processes as state "S" as you'd expect, no runaway CPU time logged, no obvious problems, nothing in the host system log. If I do "killall linux" then all the processes go to state "T" and stay there. I have to do "killall -9 linux" to get rid of the UML instance so that it can be restarted, plus the inevitable fsck on the UML instance reboot. Does anyone have a clue how I can begin to fix/debug this? Regards, Carl |
From: Jeff D. <jd...@ad...> - 2004-04-30 13:21:17
|
ca...@bo... said: > Does anyone have a clue how I can begin to fix/debug this? Run it under gdb and get a stack trace, for starters. Also, if your UML is the least bit old, try with the latest version. Jeff |
From: Carl P. <ca...@bo...> - 2004-04-30 15:14:40
|
OK So to clarify. Given that I don't know where the hang occurs, I run under gdb something like this... First make sure I've got fresh, vanilla kernel source for (say) 2.4.19 and a fresh patch gdb linux blah blah GBD blah blah GNU Public License blah blah > r umid=anomouran eth0=tuntap,,192.168.0.254 tty=xterm loads of startup messages (4 xterms start, I log in on one just to be sure all is working and test basic connectivity, network, etc.) ..then leave it running like that for a few days and when I go to use the UML instance by connecting with ssh or something and it looks like it's hung then I switch on the monitor where my gdb session was running, send gdb a signal to make it break, check where it is in the code, step through a few times to see if it's in an obvious closed loop, etc. Is that about it? The UML is the packaged version from the website as an RPM, from a month or so ago. Regards, Carl ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Dike" <jd...@ad...> To: "Carl Peto" <ca...@bo...> Cc: <use...@li...> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 3:03 PM Subject: Re: [uml-user] Hanging UML > ca...@bo... said: > > Does anyone have a clue how I can begin to fix/debug this? > > Run it under gdb and get a stack trace, for starters. Also, if your UML > is the least bit old, try with the latest version. > > Jeff > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click > _______________________________________________ > User-mode-linux-user mailing list > Use...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user > |
From: BlaisorBlade <bla...@ya...> - 2004-04-30 17:18:19
|
Alle 17:14, venerd=EC 30 aprile 2004, Carl Peto ha scritto: > OK > > So to clarify. > [...] > ..then leave it running like that for a few days and when I go to use the > UML instance by connecting with ssh or something and it looks like it's > hung then I switch on the monitor where my gdb session was running, send > gdb a signal to make it break, check where it is in the code And post this! > , step through > a few times to see if it's in an obvious closed loop, etc. > > Is that about it? Yes, it is exactly what Jeff Dike means. But I'd suggest something simpler= =20 before ( see below) > > The UML is the packaged version from the website as an RPM, from a month = or > so ago. No, well, the 2.4.19-5um is 1 *year* and half old and has LOTS of bugs! So= =20 please recompile at least a 2.4.24 guest kernel! If you use an host older than 2.4.25, then you must upgrade it. There is a = bug=20 in the host causing that behaviour: it happens when you run updatedb and th= e=20 host /dev/shm dir is reachable through a hostfs mount. So, at least 2.4.24-1 for the guest and 2.4.25 for the host. A 2.4.26 guest= =20 compiles with little changes (search 2.4.26 onto this list to find the=20 patch). If you use 2.4.24-2 patch, disable HUMFS, or it could not build. Bye =2D-=20 Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 |
From: Carl P. <ca...@bo...> - 2004-04-30 18:14:45
|
The only issue is that I'm not allowed to play with the host's kernel at = all (unless I want to land myself in hot water), which is mostly why I'm usin= g UML. I'm allowed to dowload a full 2.4.24 kernel source into my home directory and build UML there. But from what I understand it's only a problem if I'm running hostfs AND then run updatedb whatever that is. Can't I just not run updatedb? Alternatively I could limit what's mounted by hostfs? Thanks, Carl ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "BlaisorBlade" <bla...@ya...> To: <use...@li...> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 6:18 PM Subject: Re: [uml-user] Hanging UML Alle 17:14, venerd=EC 30 aprile 2004, Carl Peto ha scritto: > OK > > So to clarify. > [...] > ..then leave it running like that for a few days and when I go to use t= he > UML instance by connecting with ssh or something and it looks like it's > hung then I switch on the monitor where my gdb session was running, sen= d > gdb a signal to make it break, check where it is in the code And post this! > , step through > a few times to see if it's in an obvious closed loop, etc. > > Is that about it? Yes, it is exactly what Jeff Dike means. But I'd suggest something simple= r before ( see below) > > The UML is the packaged version from the website as an RPM, from a mont= h or > so ago. No, well, the 2.4.19-5um is 1 *year* and half old and has LOTS of bugs! S= o please recompile at least a 2.4.24 guest kernel! If you use an host older than 2.4.25, then you must upgrade it. There is = a bug in the host causing that behaviour: it happens when you run updatedb and = the host /dev/shm dir is reachable through a hostfs mount. So, at least 2.4.24-1 for the guest and 2.4.25 for the host. A 2.4.26 gue= st compiles with little changes (search 2.4.26 onto this list to find the patch). If you use 2.4.24-2 patch, disable HUMFS, or it could not build. Bye --=20 Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id=8166&op=3Dick _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list Use...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user |
From: BlaisorBlade <bla...@ya...> - 2004-04-30 18:44:26
|
Alle 20:14, venerd=EC 30 aprile 2004, Carl Peto ha scritto: > The only issue is that I'm not allowed to play with the host's kernel at > all (unless I want to land myself in hot water), which is mostly why I'm > using UML. > > I'm allowed to dowload a full 2.4.24 kernel source into my home directory > and build UML there. Do that, your UML version is old. > But from what I understand it's only a problem if I'm running hostfs AND > then run updatedb whatever that is. Can't I just not run updatedb? Run updatedb by hand and see if it crashes; if yes, tuning its configuratio= n=20 to avoid examining hostfs filesystems can be good (or you can disable it=20 entirely). > Alternatively I could limit what's mounted by hostfs? Yes, this can be done through the hostfs=3D<host path>(i.e. hostfs=3D/home)= on the=20 UML command line, or by mount none -t hostfs /mnt/hostHome -o /home (check docs if I use a wrong syntax). Bye =2D-=20 Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 |
From: Carl P. <ca...@bo...> - 2004-05-04 17:46:24
|
OK Have downloaded and patched a 2.6.4 kernel, compiled with ARCH=3Dum and r= un in gdb (on a VNC xterm). Used r umid=3Danomuran eth0=3Dtuntap,,,192.168.0.222 con=3Dpty at first breakpoint (SIGTRAP) did "c" and the "machine" was up and runnin= g. I did some basic tests like connecting with "minicom -o -p /dev/ttyp1" an= d pinging the box to check that all was well and left it yesterday afternoo= n. Sure enough today it's hung as per usual. On the host the UML threads look like this... 5502 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomuran= ) [(kernel thread)] 5504 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [(kernel thread)] 5506 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [(kernel thread)] 5507 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [(kernel thread)] 5509 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [(kernel thread)] 5511 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [(kernel thread)] 5513 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [(kernel thread)] 5515 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [(kernel thread)] 5517 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [(kernel thread)] 5518 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [(kernel thread)] 5520 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [/sbin/init] 5532 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [/sbin/devfsd] 5675 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [/sbin/rpc.portmap] 5697 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [/usr/sbin/syslogd] 5707 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [/usr/sbin/klogd] 5713 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [/usr/sbin/inetd] 5723 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [/usr/sbin/sshd] 5763 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [/usr/sbin/rpc.mountd] 5773 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [/usr/sbin/rpc.statd] 5779 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [/usr/sbin/nmbd] 5801 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [/usr/sbin/crond] 5817 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [/sbin/agetty] 5821 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [/sbin/agetty] 5825 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [/sbin/agetty] 5837 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [-bash] 6746 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [/bin/sh] 6750 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [/bin/sh] 7018 pts/2 S 0:00 /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux (anomura= n) [/bin/sh] (you can see I'm running the image from a folder in my home directory whe= re I compiled it) On the gdb window the output is the same as yesterday (when it was starte= d) but with one suspect line added at the bottom... Child 7022 exited with signal 11 So I have left it in this state as I'm not 100% sure how to go from here. The debugger is still apparently "running". It hasn't come back to the debugger prompt like it normally does when I'm debugging programs in gdb = and an exception occurs (I'm not too familiar with gdb as I'm from a Windoze background). Presumably this is because it was a child that died, rather than the main thread that is being debugged here. I was expecting a signal (Even in a child) to cause gdb to break? Isn't this the default behaviour? For completeness, here are the startup messages as I ran gdb and then the UML linux instance... carl@flanger:/bookman2/home/carl> gdb linux-2.6.4/linux GNU gdb 5.3 Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you = are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i586-suse-linux"... (gdb) r umid=3Danomuran eth0=3Dtuntap,,,192.168.0.222 con=3Dpty Starting program: /bookman2/home/carl/linux-2.6.4/linux umid=3Danomuran eth0=3Dtuntap,,,192.168.0.222 con=3Dpty Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap. 0xa000e000 in _start () (gdb) c Continuing. Checking for the skas3 patch in the host...not found Checking for /proc/mm...not found tracing thread pid =3D 5492 Linux version 2.6.4-1um (carl@flanger) (gcc version 3.3 20030226 (prerelease) (SuSE Linux)) #1 Sat May 1 22:16:28 BST 2004 On node 0 totalpages: 8192 DMA zone: 8192 pages, LIFO batch:2 Normal zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1 HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1 Built 1 zonelists Kernel command line: umid=3Danomuran eth0=3Dtuntap,,,192.168.0.222 con=3D= pty root=3D98:0 PID hash table entries: 16 (order 4: 128 bytes) Memory: 29024k available Calibrating delay loop... 2510.02 BogoMIPS Dentry cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: 2, 16384 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 2048 (order: 1, 8192 bytes) Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) Checking for host processor cmov support...Yes Checking for host processor xmm support...No Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...OK Checking that host ptys support output SIGIO...Yes Checking that host ptys support SIGIO on close...No, enabling workaround Checking for /dev/anon on the host...Not available (open failed with errn= o 2) POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX NET: Registered protocol family 16 mconsole (version 2) initialized on /home/carl/.uml/anomuran/mconsole UML Audio Relay (host dsp =3D /dev/sound/dsp, host mixer =3D /dev/sound/m= ixer) Netdevice 0 : TUN/TAP backend - IP =3D 192.168.0.222 VFS: Disk quotas dquot_6.5.1 devfs: 2004-01-31 Richard Gooch (rg...@at...) devfs: boot_options: 0x1 JFFS version 1.0, (C) 1999, 2000 Axis Communications AB Initializing Cryptographic API RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 4096K size 1024 blocksize loop: loaded (max 8 devices) Using anticipatory io scheduler nbd: registered device at major 43 PPP generic driver version 2.4.2 SLIP: version 0.8.4-NET3.019-NEWTTY (dynamic channels, max=3D256). Universal TUN/TAP device driver 1.5 (C)1999-2002 Maxim Krasnyansky blkmtd: version $Revision: 1.5 $ blkmtd: error: missing `device' name NET: Registered protocol family 2 IP: routing cache hash table of 512 buckets, 4Kbytes TCP: Hash tables configured (established 2048 bind 4096) IPv4 over IPv4 tunneling driver NET: Registered protocol family 1 NET: Registered protocol family 17 Initializing software serial port version 1 /dev/ubd/disc0: unknown partition table Initializing stdio console driver Child 7022 exited with signal 11 Note that I forgot to check if updatedb is causing a problem. D'oh. Howe= ver I thought I'd post this now, just in case it gives some food for thought. Then when I next rerun "anomuran" I can check the updatedb first and eliminate that as a problem. Thanks and Regards, Carl ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "BlaisorBlade" <bla...@ya...> To: <use...@li...> Cc: "Carl Peto" <ca...@bo...> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 7:44 PM Subject: Re: [uml-user] Hanging UML Alle 20:14, venerd=EC 30 aprile 2004, Carl Peto ha scritto: > The only issue is that I'm not allowed to play with the host's kernel a= t > all (unless I want to land myself in hot water), which is mostly why I'= m > using UML. > > I'm allowed to dowload a full 2.4.24 kernel source into my home directo= ry > and build UML there. Do that, your UML version is old. > But from what I understand it's only a problem if I'm running hostfs AN= D > then run updatedb whatever that is. Can't I just not run updatedb? Run updatedb by hand and see if it crashes; if yes, tuning its configurat= ion to avoid examining hostfs filesystems can be good (or you can disable it entirely). > Alternatively I could limit what's mounted by hostfs? Yes, this can be done through the hostfs=3D<host path>(i.e. hostfs=3D/hom= e) on the UML command line, or by mount none -t hostfs /mnt/hostHome -o /home (check docs if I use a wrong syntax). Bye --=20 Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id=8166&op=3Dick _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list Use...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user |
From: Jeff D. <jd...@ad...> - 2004-05-07 16:52:49
|
ca...@bo... said: > On the gdb window the output is the same as yesterday (when it was > started) but with one suspect line added at the bottom... > > Child 7022 exited with signal 11 This means that an out-of-context process segfaulted. Out-of-context processes aren't even supposed to be running, let alone running enough to segfault. To debug this, I'd need a stack trace from the ex-process, which isn't easy to get if you're not familiar with gdb or the kernel. Jeff |
From: Carl P. <ca...@bo...> - 2004-05-10 13:45:34
|
My gdb is shaky. Anyway I did a Ctrl-C to find out where it was waiting... 0xa01987ac in __libc_waitpid (pid=-1, stat_loc=0xbfffee38, options=2) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/waitpid.c:28 28 ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/waitpid.c: No such file or directory. in ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/waitpid.c I don't know if this helps? Otherwise I'll try to make sure that updatedb either isn't causing problems or isn't running and I'll start the debugger again. Any other advice on how to track down the bug? I'm pretty familiar with debuggers generally having used the VAX debugger in my FORTRAN days and having used Delphi's IDE on and off for the past 9 years. I've also bought the book about GDB (from the .org village at last year's Linux Expo) and read it cover to cover! I've only got "tourist" knowledge of the kernel though, hopefully I don't have to reach kernel hacker status though before I can track this down? Carl ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Dike" <jd...@ad...> To: "Carl Peto" <ca...@bo...> Cc: <use...@li...> Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 6:36 PM Subject: Re: [uml-user] Hanging UML > ca...@bo... said: > > On the gdb window the output is the same as yesterday (when it was > > started) but with one suspect line added at the bottom... > > > > Child 7022 exited with signal 11 > > This means that an out-of-context process segfaulted. Out-of-context processes > aren't even supposed to be running, let alone running enough to segfault. > > To debug this, I'd need a stack trace from the ex-process, which isn't easy > to get if you're not familiar with gdb or the kernel. > > Jeff > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software > Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to > deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. > http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3 > _______________________________________________ > User-mode-linux-user mailing list > Use...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user > |
From: Carl P. <ca...@bo...> - 2004-05-20 09:03:57
|
This seems to have been solved by Jeff's initial suggestion anyway! I just got rid of the crontab entry for updatedb (I never use locate or slocate anyway!) and my UML instance has been running for about a week without any signs of hanging. Simple, huh? THANKS JEFF!! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Carl Peto" <ca...@bo...> To: "Jeff Dike" <jd...@ad...> Cc: <use...@li...> Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 2:45 PM Subject: Re: [uml-user] Hanging UML > My gdb is shaky. > > Anyway I did a Ctrl-C to find out where it was waiting... > > 0xa01987ac in __libc_waitpid (pid=-1, stat_loc=0xbfffee38, options=2) > > at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/waitpid.c:28 > > 28 ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/waitpid.c: No such file or directory. > > in ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/waitpid.c > > > > I don't know if this helps? > > > Otherwise I'll try to make sure that updatedb either isn't causing problems > or isn't running and I'll start the debugger again. > > Any other advice on how to track down the bug? I'm pretty familiar with > debuggers generally having used the VAX debugger in my FORTRAN days and > having used Delphi's IDE on and off for the past 9 years. I've also bought > the book about GDB (from the .org village at last year's Linux Expo) and > read it cover to cover! > > I've only got "tourist" knowledge of the kernel though, hopefully I don't > have to reach kernel hacker status though before I can track this down? > > Carl > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jeff Dike" <jd...@ad...> > To: "Carl Peto" <ca...@bo...> > Cc: <use...@li...> > Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 6:36 PM > Subject: Re: [uml-user] Hanging UML > > > > ca...@bo... said: > > > On the gdb window the output is the same as yesterday (when it was > > > started) but with one suspect line added at the bottom... > > > > > > Child 7022 exited with signal 11 > > > > This means that an out-of-context process segfaulted. Out-of-context > processes > > aren't even supposed to be running, let alone running enough to segfault. > > > > To debug this, I'd need a stack trace from the ex-process, which isn't > easy > > to get if you're not familiar with gdb or the kernel. > > > > Jeff > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software > > Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to > > deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. > > http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3 > > _______________________________________________ > > User-mode-linux-user mailing list > > Use...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software > Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to > deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. > http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3 > _______________________________________________ > User-mode-linux-user mailing list > Use...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user > |