From: Ritesh R. S. <rr...@de...> - 2016-07-20 17:22:15
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hello Jeff, Richard and the UML Team. Me and Mattia are maintainers for UML in the Debian Distribution. Recently, during a refresh of the package, we realized that the User Mode Linux website, which hosts useful documentation, doesn't seem to have been updated in years. The documentation which still is active and useful[1] is marked as "old" on the website. The wiki [2] on the other hand, points to a link with no content at all. Could you please share on what the roadmap and future plans for UML are? And for the documentation on the old site, do you have it in a Source Markup Language? What we've used now is a dump of the website from [1] [1] http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/old/ [2] http://uml.harlowhill.com/ - -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXj68dAAoJEKY6WKPy4XVpDEMQAJuzJVT9z2KMLYl+69RSe1wL VHbrT23TPVEuIBMFPxpilSbJcTGAg9XA/WJ/h+xONzAQ14rKBsoJFAvPGkZHJHsf aNSXNU4fI2EEPNoYCocZnQwbuReeI4up8BnIX9KxuSOmOJirbkC88YG9EfmmpjSG Nm8nJFZdXa8psXz7zfxH1BZyMTWDwaqfKfxvwQmrA4s0FjUY8pL/2ggEggLRsClR 8lzxsvzs1Zt/1+wostGYCqXRfQBKfyHBUlrBBsI2GhxjEndZHQTkxR8iWCSzfAZg mydkz1uEDyme3Op+rSOyRgO9DTlNdnczM9/6rL6Zs4CEDyy0Xowk0BZBTV0Bd3Bw U5WvjgEEnyvGsmvSyY0wj7A+FdRWnlRJrCanRlPSLc1iuJAgebDDRyL7qmVIaW9Z JJrOgH+NLo7Yer7xpOn7esChu7Gjw1kO6IFsD9xqMVsCy5ByPMPqpDrfL5SFhMPo CycOalMupTjT4rRR9ocMF7XebCLIIxAT0Rvwvmyk4gbYryZZlT6pKDTe9XzmHgCN EMs9t8kxle0hSDT+z2FE9w5/6b6cYbAALRe305n/Xy8GmGwA1bZ/xJC761JB+TlG xq5jl94T9rhqQX9epquVGmgj8e9LTamm0epH1hX6yq/4j6RXK1JkOSeBqP+WtAN7 74LAtsW3NP8g6zagx/kb =giYU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Anton I. <ant...@ko...> - 2016-07-20 17:29:09
|
I have some patches which bring network performance to > 3gbit for a single core virtual router/firewall/net device, need to find time to get them up to date and resubmit. Some disk is improvements too. On 20 July 2016 19:04:28 CEST, Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rr...@de...> wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA512 > >Hello Jeff, Richard and the UML Team. > >Me and Mattia are maintainers for UML in the Debian Distribution. > >Recently, during a refresh of the package, we realized that the User >Mode Linux >website, which hosts useful documentation, doesn't seem to have been >updated in >years. > >The documentation which still is active and useful[1] is marked as >"old" on the >website. >The wiki [2] on the other hand, points to a link with no content at >all. > >Could you please share on what the roadmap and future plans for UML >are? >And for the documentation on the old site, do you have it in a Source >Markup >Language? What we've used now is a dump of the website from [1] > >[1] http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/old/ >[2] http://uml.harlowhill.com/ > >- -- >Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs >Debian - The Universal Operating System >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > >iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXj68dAAoJEKY6WKPy4XVpDEMQAJuzJVT9z2KMLYl+69RSe1wL >VHbrT23TPVEuIBMFPxpilSbJcTGAg9XA/WJ/h+xONzAQ14rKBsoJFAvPGkZHJHsf >aNSXNU4fI2EEPNoYCocZnQwbuReeI4up8BnIX9KxuSOmOJirbkC88YG9EfmmpjSG >Nm8nJFZdXa8psXz7zfxH1BZyMTWDwaqfKfxvwQmrA4s0FjUY8pL/2ggEggLRsClR >8lzxsvzs1Zt/1+wostGYCqXRfQBKfyHBUlrBBsI2GhxjEndZHQTkxR8iWCSzfAZg >mydkz1uEDyme3Op+rSOyRgO9DTlNdnczM9/6rL6Zs4CEDyy0Xowk0BZBTV0Bd3Bw >U5WvjgEEnyvGsmvSyY0wj7A+FdRWnlRJrCanRlPSLc1iuJAgebDDRyL7qmVIaW9Z >JJrOgH+NLo7Yer7xpOn7esChu7Gjw1kO6IFsD9xqMVsCy5ByPMPqpDrfL5SFhMPo >CycOalMupTjT4rRR9ocMF7XebCLIIxAT0Rvwvmyk4gbYryZZlT6pKDTe9XzmHgCN >EMs9t8kxle0hSDT+z2FE9w5/6b6cYbAALRe305n/Xy8GmGwA1bZ/xJC761JB+TlG >xq5jl94T9rhqQX9epquVGmgj8e9LTamm0epH1hX6yq/4j6RXK1JkOSeBqP+WtAN7 >74LAtsW3NP8g6zagx/kb >=giYU >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and >traffic >patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and >protocols are >consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for >NetFlow, >J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity >planning >reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev >_______________________________________________ >User-mode-linux-devel mailing list >Use...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. |
From: Richard W. <ri...@no...> - 2016-07-20 17:39:38
|
Hi! Am 20.07.2016 um 19:04 schrieb Ritesh Raj Sarraf: > Hello Jeff, Richard and the UML Team. > > Me and Mattia are maintainers for UML in the Debian Distribution. > > Recently, during a refresh of the package, we realized that the User Mode Linux > website, which hosts useful documentation, doesn't seem to have been updated in > years. > The documentation which still is active and useful[1] is marked as "old" on the > website. > The wiki [2] on the other hand, points to a link with no content at all. > > Could you please share on what the roadmap and future plans for UML are? Well, I maintain the UML kernel component. That meas I keep it running, fix regressions and try to answer questions from other developers. Since I do this in my spare time there is not much time left for adding new features. So, my roadmap is "keep it alive" :-) > And for the documentation on the old site, do you have it in a Source Markup > Language? What we've used now is a dump of the website from [1] I don't have such a dump. But I agree that we need to rework the website. It is very, very old. Maybe it is worth adding a UML section to http://kernelnewbies.org/? Thanks, //richard |
From: Ritesh R. S. <rr...@de...> - 2016-07-20 18:17:50
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hello Richard, On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 19:39 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > > The documentation which still is active and useful[1] is marked as "old" on > the > > website. > > The wiki [2] on the other hand, points to a link with no content at all. > > > > Could you please share on what the roadmap and future plans for UML are? > > Well, I maintain the UML kernel component. That meas I keep it running, fix > regressions > and try to answer questions from other developers. > Since I do this in my spare time there is not much time left for adding new > features. > > So, my roadmap is "keep it alive" :-) > Okay! Thanks for the update. I had the same impression and am glad to read that you will continue to maintain it. > > And for the documentation on the old site, do you have it in a Source Markup > > Language? What we've used now is a dump of the website from [1] > > I don't have such a dump. But I agree that we need to rework the website. > It is very, very old. > Maybe it is worth adding a UML section to http://kernelnewbies.org/? IN my opinion, the kernel wiki may be a better option for long term maintenance. https://wiki.kernel.org/ The main page for wiki points no login link. But once you get into one of the sub wikis, you can see the login link. Take this link for example: https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php?title=Specia l:UserLogin&returnto=Main+Page Maybe you could ask the kernel infra team to create a sub-wiki house for uml ? And then we can all help migrate the content ? For Debian, we'll keep the documentation package, and update when UML site finds a new home. - -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXj7lFAAoJEKY6WKPy4XVp8zcP/3GjLhFGfoK7TeF4YpHH9Wol 2fJQQVvSlcs2XDYoH5UKPJHDmZNQn3soOOmanrQVCfj9F5hNb5pf7DQP3YRid7sD MMZK7V9dyCOmRwO+NxzZGH6L742vWNd1KDyJCPRi19LiVVvIRjQhO3y+MCzZve9g LGIdSYo/3unriitm6fBOEdK1YOx70Gz/tr6IVrwzgWXvRhH76pGGWsimkibxEOw4 LSXHzZUy5NUd5Rb3JMUm+KCugIacgnJdbuqA1lCNXSMBpcjcjIOH9BBn6MNZkG6Y B7nm+XbUjzc/whpV7iQkTOq5sMPyxjCNFqVEtVhweXlwRHAghpV9NcHVGjUVQQFz o4kHwoYttiT/phfzYDzWOOTi8Yr0g3iBX2VkKLVYBAg3jLcITo6ySSBb2ue1LKXP WVDZZ6ly4mHfhSgjSf730vE4hKfPmi3iYgz5ukEXwrspDy0LXjExxXhmLcgqsLaQ dxtdr7on+N/JRMy74gQsasfCR2evTkbJsulGK4k3D7TaHhT8HimuHMcOIODO0oQx bnOozHnT6xGWVU+B9FGV5Vw/8hVaGleVKeovLkgtY/3rZ7qVC4AgnLxLJGX22whp RZg5+faQQaMX9IXOBT6Md+sPZj7nMGUIqO7ypzDl7FgqW7xntHriqSpIaUkD0O+c 6SiaHCKLYDAYScHYYeT+ =G/U0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Richard W. <ri...@no...> - 2016-07-24 18:52:33
|
Am 20.07.2016 um 19:47 schrieb Ritesh Raj Sarraf: > Hello Richard, > > On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 19:39 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> The documentation which still is active and useful[1] is marked as "old" on >> the >>> website. >>> The wiki [2] on the other hand, points to a link with no content at all. >>> >>> Could you please share on what the roadmap and future plans for UML are? > >> Well, I maintain the UML kernel component. That meas I keep it running, fix >> regressions >> and try to answer questions from other developers. >> Since I do this in my spare time there is not much time left for adding new >> features. > >> So, my roadmap is "keep it alive" :-) > > > Okay! Thanks for the update. I had the same impression and am glad to read that > you will continue to maintain it. > >>> And for the documentation on the old site, do you have it in a Source Markup >>> Language? What we've used now is a dump of the website from [1] > >> I don't have such a dump. But I agree that we need to rework the website. >> It is very, very old. >> Maybe it is worth adding a UML section to http://kernelnewbies.org/? > > IN my opinion, the kernel wiki may be a better option for long term maintenance. > https://wiki.kernel.org/ Agreed. > The main page for wiki points no login link. But once you get into one of the > sub wikis, you can see the login link. > Take this link for example: https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php?title=Specia > l:UserLogin&returnto=Main+Page > > Maybe you could ask the kernel infra team to create a sub-wiki house for uml ? > And then we can all help migrate the content ? Just sent a request to get a wiki instance. :-) Thanks, //richard |