From: Richard W. <ri...@no...> - 2016-07-24 18:52:33
|
Am 20.07.2016 um 19:47 schrieb Ritesh Raj Sarraf: > Hello Richard, > > On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 19:39 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> The documentation which still is active and useful[1] is marked as "old" on >> the >>> website. >>> The wiki [2] on the other hand, points to a link with no content at all. >>> >>> Could you please share on what the roadmap and future plans for UML are? > >> Well, I maintain the UML kernel component. That meas I keep it running, fix >> regressions >> and try to answer questions from other developers. >> Since I do this in my spare time there is not much time left for adding new >> features. > >> So, my roadmap is "keep it alive" :-) > > > Okay! Thanks for the update. I had the same impression and am glad to read that > you will continue to maintain it. > >>> And for the documentation on the old site, do you have it in a Source Markup >>> Language? What we've used now is a dump of the website from [1] > >> I don't have such a dump. But I agree that we need to rework the website. >> It is very, very old. >> Maybe it is worth adding a UML section to http://kernelnewbies.org/? > > IN my opinion, the kernel wiki may be a better option for long term maintenance. > https://wiki.kernel.org/ Agreed. > The main page for wiki points no login link. But once you get into one of the > sub wikis, you can see the login link. > Take this link for example: https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php?title=Specia > l:UserLogin&returnto=Main+Page > > Maybe you could ask the kernel infra team to create a sub-wiki house for uml ? > And then we can all help migrate the content ? Just sent a request to get a wiki instance. :-) Thanks, //richard |