Re: [uml-user] Stability and Kernel Panics

[Simon H. <si...@op...>]

Jeff Dike wrote:

>to...@to... said:
>
>>i believe the patches are updated much more often than rpm binaries...
>>
>
>Yup, and bugs get fixed.  The 2.4.17 cycle has been a long one, so my
>2.4.17 patch series has accumulated a larger than usual number of fixes
>over the stock 2.4.17 UML in the RPM and deb.
>
Do you reckon it's secure and stable enough to do something like a very 
secure sandboxed virtual server.
I'm going to try and get iptables on the host to make sure if they break 
in, they can't get out again, anyone tried stuff like this yet?

Simon...