From: Jonathan W. <jo...@sp...> - 2002-01-29 20:45:27
|
On Thursday, January 24, 2002, at 12:19 PM, Jeff Dike wrote: > jo...@sp... said: >> Ah, I tried it using UML 2.4.17-2 - glad to hear this is working. > > Except the bug I had in mind was fixed in UML 2.4.14-3. Can you try > 2.4.17-8 and see if you can reproduce it still? > > Finally got some cycles to try this out on 2.4.17-9 - I'm still seeing it. You mentioned a pthread problem in rh7.1 (which is what I'm using) - were you referring to this problem? Jonathan |