From: Matt Z. <md...@de...> - 2002-01-14 23:49:39
|
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 06:06:42PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote: > md...@de... said: > > But this would still have to be updated with each new UML kernel, and > > also in folks' private images, unless we mount over all of /lib/ > > modules. > > Yeah, good point. Another possibility - have a generic line in fstab that > mounts them someplace like /lib/modules/current and have an rc script make > a symlink to there from /lib/modules/`uname -whatever`. That's a promising idea. We could mount /usr/lib/uml on the host as /usr/lib/uml inside UML, and just set up a symlink from, /lib/modules/<version> to, say, /usr/lib/uml/modules/<version>. Having /usr/lib/uml available as a standard would provide a place for other things that one might want to share with the UML systems, also. It might be nice to have a standard UML "overlay" that could be untarred over an image to make things like this work, containing a few init scripts and the like. Maybe even an RPM or deb for installing them on RPMish and Debianish root images. I use a simple one for Debian potato which creates the UBD block devices and an appropriate fstab for booting as ubd0 under UML. -- - mdz |