Re: [uml-devel] 2.4.9-2um

[Jeff D. <jd...@ka...>]

um...@os... said:
> The point is that the config I use is the one YOU distribute, 
> If you distribute the one that corresponds to the binaries you distribute, 
> then my script will produce an RPM the contains the same (as near as we can 
> do it with different compilers/libraries) binary.

When you're experimenting with it and getting it to work nicely, you can
bend the rules a little once in a while.  So, at this point, I don't see
the problem with fiddling the config if the build breaks.

And I still think whatever you have driving oldconfig is broken...

				Jeff