Re: [uml-devel] 2.4.9-2um

[JS <um...@os...>]

On Thu, 30 Aug 2001 02:34, you wrote:
> um...@os... said:
> >     TUN/TAP transport (CONFIG_UML_NET_TUNTAP) [N/y/?] (NEW)
> >   Sorry, no help available for this option yet.
> >     TUN/TAP transport (CONFIG_UML_NET_TUNTAP) [N/y/?] (NEW)
> >   Sorry, no help available for this option yet.
> >     TUN/TAP transport (CONFIG_UML_NET_TUNTAP) [N/y/?] (NEW)
> >   Sorry, no help available for this option yet.
>
> How is your script driving oldconfig?  It looks pretty broken wrt new
> options.

See next para

>
> > If you want a script to build rpms properly, you need to distribute a
> > proper  working configuration. I'm trying to use the one in arch/um/
> > config.release
>
> So turn on CONFIG_UML_NET_TUNTAP with xconfig or something and move tha=
t
> config to config.release.  This bug isn't that hard to work around.


The point is that the config I use is the one YOU distribute,

If you distribute the one that corresponds to the binaries you distribute=
,=20
then my script will produce an RPM the contains the same (as near as we c=
an=20
do it with different compilers/libraries) binary.

When I'm satisified that I have no errors in the script then I can releas=
e it=20
for you (and anyone else) to use.