From: Terry H. <ter...@gm...> - 2013-05-01 17:55:32
|
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Richard RW. Weinberger < ri...@si...> wrote: > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > > > > > > > UML development mostly stopped in favor to KVM. > > > > > > so you mean to say that KVM is preferable to UML? > > (I Guess it may depend on the situation?) > > KVM is *much* faster than UML and *much* less hacky. :-) > > Indeed, I am developing some functions for the virtual memory subsystem in the kernel. Qemu replaces UML in my case. I run qemu without kvm support because I don't seem to be able to run nested virtualization in virtualbox. Anyway now Qemu serves me well. :) Is Jeff Dike still developing UML? > Thanks, > //richard > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET > Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost. > Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead > Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1 > _______________________________________________ > User-mode-linux-devel mailing list > Use...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel > |