From: Jeff D. <jd...@ad...> - 2009-06-16 03:21:02
|
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 06:22:46PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Jeff Dike<jd...@ad...> wrote: > > > > The problem with SMP on skas0 > > Does that mean that it works more easily on skas3? Yup. That completely avoids ptrace issues. I think things should just about work at that point. When you have multiple threads on different CPUs running simultaneously, they will just switch themselves into the appropriate address space. I can't think of any problems with this offhand. > > I actually had this somewhat working, but the code was a horror show, > > with much nastiness about ignoring the signals that are needed in > > order to prevent a detached process from running. > > > > So it's probably not on the horizon any time soon then? No - I haven't done much with UML in a while... Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com |