[uml-user] SKAS/SYSEMU for 2.6.10

[attriel <at...@d2...>]

Amidst a large number of fuzz/offset notices, I get this when applying
host-skas-2.6.9-v7 patch to my 2.6.10 kernel:

patching file arch/i386/kernel/ptrace.c
Hunk #2 FAILED at 359.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 413 with fuzz 1 (offset 46 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 410 with fuzz 2 (offset -10 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 567 (offset 39 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 583 (offset -10 lines).
Hunk #7 succeeded at 643 (offset 39 lines).
Hunk #8 succeeded at 627 (offset -10 lines).
1 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
arch/i386/kernel/ptrace.c.rej

The .rej contains:

more arch/i386/kernel/ptrace.c.rej
***************
*** 358,363 ****
                  }
                  break;

        case PTRACE_SYSCALL: /* continue and stop at next (return from)
syscall
*/
        case PTRACE_CONT: { /* restart after signal. */
                long tmp;
--- 359,365 ----
                  }
                  break;

+       case PTRACE_SYSEMU: /* continue and stop at next syscall, which
will not
 be executed */
        case PTRACE_SYSCALL: /* continue and stop at next (return from)
syscall
*/
        case PTRACE_CONT: { /* restart after signal. */
                long tmp;


The PTRACE_SYSCALL is now on line 410, and it looks like it should apply
cleanly there (text all looks the same) -- Is there any issue with just
making the change and going with it?  I presume I'm hitting a patch
limitation and it just isn't looking 50 lines out-of-place for it ?

Thanks for the advice!

--attriel