From: Bodo S. <bst...@fu...> - 2005-06-16 18:31:24
|
Blaisorblade wrote: > arch_switch already exists (wasn't used for SKAS). About improving it and > making it more "general-purpose" (I've written this for the TLS code needs), > could you have a look to the attached patches? do_fork-* is another thing (a > cleanup discussed some time ago with Jeff) but may be needed to apply the > second. Wouldn't it be better to have separate arch_switch_tt and arch_switch_skas? I think, arch_switch has to do different things for tt and skas (and maybe even for skas0 and skas3) Bodo |