From: mindphuzz <min...@ya...> - 2004-04-02 00:42:46
|
Yes. You're right. That was uml version 2.4.19.5um from the RPM version on the uml site running on 2.4.18-3. However, Thanks to Jeff Dike's comments on another issue I decided to move to a newer kernel to see if that fixed my various problems. Thanks! --- BlaisorBlade <bla...@ya...> wrote: > Alle 20:35, sabato 27 marzo 2004, mindphuzz ha > scritto: > > Ok, I looked this up in the archive and found some > > related errors, but nothing conclusive so I'll ask > > here. > > Please state your UML version, host kernel version > and so on (distro, gcc > version). If you have read something in the > archives, you probably should > have noticed everyone provides his configuration. > > In fact, when I write this, nobody has yet answered > you (not because we are > evil, but because without info we can't). Learn from > this, and help us to > help you. > > Bye > -- > Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade > Linux registered user n. 292729 > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ |