Re: [uml-devel] Re: [patch 7/7] uml: resolve symbols in back-traces

[Chris W. <cw...@f0...>]

On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 01:44:11AM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:

> ??? I don't understand you well. If there are compile-commands for
> emacs, they're broken too - using make namefile.o ARCH=um is the
> kernel universal solution.

consider a load-able module for uml ... the compile command might be
to build and load the module into a running UML instance...  for some
people that's a pretty nice working module where you dont have to
leave your editor to boot/run test things