Re: [uml-devel] Re: [uml-user] LTT in UML ?

[Joe M. <gm...@no...>]

you are not the only one interested. There is a difference in what would 
be shown with tracing UML from the host vs. tracing the guest 
processes/kernel in a UML guest. I have the patches applied here as well 
but it does not look like it is working. let's keep in touch as we 
discover things.

regards, GSM

David Bahi wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> right. yet, not what i was going for.
> i'd like to profile applications running
> under/within the uml itself.
> 
> still, looks like it's just me that's
> interested in this so i'll give it a go
> when i get a chance and post specific
> questions to this list when i'm lost.
> 
> - --
> db
> 
> Nuno Silva wrote:
> 
> | roland wrote:
> |
> | [..]
> |
> |  >
> |  > probably, having an LTT option for the uml-kernel could give some
> | benefit (performance optimization?)
> |  > for the uml project ?
> |  >
> |
> | You can do that already. Run LTT on the host and "trace" the UML
> | processes ;)
> |
> | Regards,
> | Nuno Silva
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQFAn7GQ3XQ4zakZ3z4RApfJAJ4/95BNqYzt/uRWCPWPwHlozVBvrACfTkjH
> 2qU4ecl/5pHhbe0Pl+MfB+8=
> =yEiC
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----