Re: Resolution (Re: [uml-devel] 2.4.22-[67] problems)

[Nuno S. <nun...@vg...>]

Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>>puma:/uml# fg
>>./linux
>>Segmentation fault
>>puma:/uml#
> 
> 
> This looks quite different from what I and others were seeing in #224431,
> which was random ENOSYS errors because the system call number in the regs
> struct was being mysteriously cleared during a context switch on the cost.

Yes, probably not the same issue.

I've made some new tests and I'd say that my problem relates to NPTL in 
glibc. (I don't have a fix, yet :( )

I'll open another thread :-)

Regards,
Nuno Silva