Re: Resolution (Re: [uml-devel] 2.4.22-[67] problems)

[Nuno S. <nun...@vg...>]

>>
>> I suspect that the problem lies in this direction, because it's the only
>> relevant news that I've heard from glibc in recent months, but I wouldn't
>> expect NPTL to relate directly because I'm running on 2.4 (as are several
>> others who have seen the problem).
>>
>> This is the issue where i386 support was dropped and i486-specific
>> instructions used, right?
>>
> 
> Yes, AFAIK nptl requires 486 asm.
> 
> I just finished testing debian-unstable with glibc with nptl, tls and 
> __thread support in chroot and everything works fine except UML :)
> 

Another suspect is sysenter/sysexit support present in recent libc when 
used with 2.6.0... Hmmm :)

Regards,
Nuno Silva