From: Jeff D. <jd...@ad...> - 2003-12-06 18:05:03
|
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 10:41:43AM +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > If there is a way where the above can be done without having to use > bitkeeper then I am all set. There's no requirement at all to use BitKeeper. Feel free to send me patches in any reasonable form you want, which in your case would probably just be patches. I also make plain patches available, so there's no need for BK in order to get my tree. Also, my 2.4 tree, which is where new stuff is added first right now, is just in CVS. Jeff |