|
From: Mark R. <ma...@ge...> - 2003-04-28 18:48:57
|
On Monday 28 April 2003 5:15 pm, you wrote: > Moin Mark, > > i joined this list a few dates to late - so I missed your posting, of > your port of UML+2.4.21-pre7 ? The source-forge archive does not include > eMails addresses, so I need to ask you here, if you can mail me your patch. I haven't made a patch, and stupidly, today, I accidentally reformatted the machine I've kept it on. Needless to say, the patch was very easy and I can do it again quickly. I will have to do it soon anyway. The UML patch from 2.4.20 actually patches on 2.4.21-pre7 anyway, but it did not compile correctly. > - renaming of kernel_thread -> arch_kernel_thread Yes, I noticed that one, and I fixed it by changing kernel_thread -> arch_kernel_thread in the UML arch place it was defined. > - kernel_thread is now part of fork.c Same fix as the 1st one. > - int/long confusion with kernel_thread I just made them all the same. > - 2.4.21-rc1 wont compile without 'Processor type and features' > as it needs CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT and similary definitions. > > I think I solved the first 3 points, but did'nt had the time to > patch arch/um/config.in for the CONFIG_X86_* flags. I haven't seen that one before, maybe it changed between -pre7 and -rc1 Sorry I can't help more, Regards Mark |