Re: [uml-user] UML networking

[Ferdinand O. T. <pol...@mo...>]

Ewps, I think I was wrong.
The ip of the UML is 198.142.50.209. I stand corrected :-)

--F


On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Ferdinand O. Tempel wrote:

> I could be wrong of course.
> Odd, it looks like:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use
> Iface
> 120.1.0.200     120.1.0.199     255.255.255.255 UGH   0      0        0
> tap0
>
> on my end, with the gateway explicitly to the ip address of the tap0
> interface. Besides, as I understand the story of Bill, the ip address of
> the UML is 198.142.50.103, not 198.142.50.209. Correct me if I'm wrong.
> Wouldn't the below pasted line not just route traffic to itself to tap0?
>
> I think it gets confusing because Bill reuses the ip address of his eth0
> interface for tap0. I just assign it its own.
>
> If my assumptions and deductions are wrong, ignore things I've said :P
>
> Regards,
>
> --F
>
>
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Jeff Dike wrote:
>
> > pol...@mo... said:
> > > route add -host 198.142.50.103 gw 198.142.50.209 dev tap0
> >
> > It looks to me like this
> >
> > > 198.142.50.209  0.0.0.0         255.255.255.255 UH    0      0        0 tap0
> >
> > is a host route to the UML through tap0.  That looks right to me.
> >
> > 				Jeff
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Two, two, TWO treats in one.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > _______________________________________________
> > User-mode-linux-user mailing list
> > Use...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
> >
> >
>
>