From: Matt Z. <md...@de...> - 2002-05-26 20:20:12
|
On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 01:16:03PM -0700, Roger Binns wrote: > > If you allow UML's own exit code to be set by another program running > > under UML, how will it be possible to distinguish between a UML failure > > and a failure on the part of that program? > > Define exit code 126 to belong to UML itself having issues, and all others > open to the programs within to set. UML currently always appears to exit > with code 0 so this won't break backwards compatibility or anything > similar. If this feature were implemented, I would mostly be interested in using it for propagating the exit status of a program running under UML. If a certain exit code is reserved this way, then I would have to ensure that the program could never return that exit code, or translate it to something else (hopefully unused). -- - mdz |