Thread: [Tuxpaint-devel] Tux Paint 0.9.18 status
An award-winning drawing program for children of all ages
Brought to you by:
wkendrick
|
From: Bill K. <nb...@so...> - 2007-10-20 22:10:02
|
For those curious, here's the current status of Tux Paint 0.9.18...
* I'm hoping a friend came make a few sfx for some of the new Magic Tools
that lack any sounds
* Win32 status, per John Popplewell:
+ Magic Tool plugins/DLLs working.
+ It's likely that Win2K/XP/Vista will be full-featured, but
Win95/98/ME will have older SVG libs and no Pango support
(he's had issues with GLib and friends on those older platforms).
I'm fine with that...
+ Hoping to use SDL 1.2.12 and friends, but he's only got SDL going so far,
not support libs (SDL_image, SDL_mixer, etc.)
+ Likely to be looking at Tux Paint on Win32 again this weekend!
* Mac OS X status, per Martin Fuhrer:
+ Magic Tool plugins working on PPC, but not yet on Intel
(due to issues with x86 gettext); asked an Intel-Mac-owning friend for
assistance
+ Will be looking into SDL_Pango soon
+ Started looking at Tux Paint again a few days ago; will continue this week
I'm not 100% sure what, if anything, will need to change in Tux Paint source
and/or any of the platform-specific build files (Makefile, XCode stuff, etc.),
so I'm holding off on doing an official source release until John and Martin
get back to me on that...
In the meantime, I'll probably roll an rc1 (release candidate 1) some time
today.
--
-bill!
bi...@ne...
http://www.newbreedsoftware.com/
|
|
From: Caroline F. <car...@go...> - 2007-10-21 05:26:38
|
> * I'm hoping a friend came make a few sfx for some of the new Magic Tools > that lack any sounds If you are stuck let me know what needs doing and I'll have a go. Caroline |
|
From: Bill K. <nb...@so...> - 2007-10-22 05:44:15
|
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 06:26:42AM +0100, Caroline Ford wrote: > > * I'm hoping a friend came make a few sfx for some of the new Magic Tools > > that lack any sounds > > If you are stuck let me know what needs doing and I'll have a go. Thanks Caroline! For the new "Shift" tool (it slides the entire image around the canvas), I was thinking some heavy machinery / chain sounds would be good. (Cah-chunk, cah-chunk, cah-chunk...) Calligraphy could probably just be a nice soft brush-on-paper sound (or perhaps a few different sounds, to respond to the varying thicknesses the tool paints with, depending on the speed of the stroke). And finally, Kaliedoscope needs a sound. Nothing comes to mind, though. :^/ -bill! |
|
From: <tor...@at...> - 2007-10-22 13:44:38
|
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 22:44:15 -0700, Bill Kendrick <nb...@so...> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 06:26:42AM +0100, Caroline Ford wrote: >> > * I'm hoping a friend came make a few sfx for some of the new Magic > Tools Not sure if there will be any license issues, but http://freesound.iua.upf.edu/index.php has a nice free creative commons-licensed sound library. Kind regards, Tore |
|
From: Caroline F. <car...@go...> - 2007-10-22 13:51:31
|
On 22/10/2007, tor...@at... <tor...@at...> wrote: > > > On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 22:44:15 -0700, Bill Kendrick <nb...@so...> wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 06:26:42AM +0100, Caroline Ford wrote: > >> > * I'm hoping a friend came make a few sfx for some of the new Magic > > Tools > > Not sure if there will be any license issues, but http://freesound.iua.upf.edu/index.php > has a nice free creative commons-licensed sound library. They are released under Creative Commons Sampling + 1.0. That's not one of the normal CC licenses and I'll need to check re: compliance with the GPL. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/sampling+/1.0/ This is the problme with "creative commons licensed" - it can be anything from CC-BY (just attribution) to the totally non free CC-NC-ND (non commercial and no derivative works0. Caroline |
|
From: Caroline F. <car...@go...> - 2007-10-22 13:56:51
|
On 22/10/2007, Caroline Ford <car...@go...> wrote: > On 22/10/2007, tor...@at... <tor...@at...> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 22:44:15 -0700, Bill Kendrick <nb...@so...> wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 06:26:42AM +0100, Caroline Ford wrote: > > >> > * I'm hoping a friend came make a few sfx for some of the new Magic > > > Tools > > > > Not sure if there will be any license issues, but http://freesound.iua.upf.edu/index.php > > has a nice free creative commons-licensed sound library. > > They are released under Creative Commons Sampling + 1.0. That's not > one of the normal CC licenses and I'll need to check re: compliance > with the GPL. > > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/sampling+/1.0/ > > This is the problme with "creative commons licensed" - it can be > anything from CC-BY (just attribution) to the totally non free > CC-NC-ND (non commercial and no derivative works0. > > Caroline > I'm gonna call it as non free license. It doesn't seem to allow commercial distribution of the unmodified sound. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/sampling+/1.0/legalcode The small print has the following in it: # Re-creativity permitted. You may create and reproduce Derivative Works, provided that: 1. the Derivative Work(s) constitute a good-faith partial or recombined usage employing "sampling," "collage," "mash-up," or other comparable artistic technique, whether now known or hereafter devised, that is highly transformative of the original, as appropriate to the medium, genre, and market niche; and 2. Your Derivative Work(s) must only make a partial use of the original Work, or if You choose to use the original Work as a whole, You must either use the Work as an insubstantial portion of Your Derivative Work(s) or transform it into something substantially different from the original Work. In the case of a musical Work and/or audio recording, the mere synchronization ("synching") of the Work with a moving image shall not be considered a transformation of the Work into something substantially different. Caroline |