Thread: [Tuxpaint-devel] Tux Paint 0.9.16rc2 & friends available
An award-winning drawing program for children of all ages
Brought to you by:
wkendrick
Menu
▾
▴
tuxpaint-devel
|
From: Bill K. <nb...@so...> - 2006-10-08 06:09:08
|
I've just put together a new set of release candidates. Tux Paint 0.9.16rc2, TP Config 0.0.7rc2 and TP Stamps 2006.10.07 are available from my FTP site: ftp://ftp.tuxpaint.org/unix/x/tuxpaint/testbuilds/source/ Packagers and porters, please let me know what issues are still preventing final release. (I'm guessing a Mac OS X build of 0.9.16 won't happen, since there are still some major issues that will need patching.) Thanks! -- -bill! bi...@ne... http://www.newbreedsoftware.com/ |
|
From: Bill K. <nb...@so...> - 2006-10-08 19:58:20
|
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 11:09:06PM -0700, Bill Kendrick wrote: > > I've just put together a new set of release candidates. > Tux Paint 0.9.16rc2, TP Config 0.0.7rc2 and TP Stamps 2006.10.07 > are available from my FTP site: > > ftp://ftp.tuxpaint.org/unix/x/tuxpaint/testbuilds/source/ The same is now available for Windows. John Popplewell writes: Tux Paint is the latest version and has that win32 mod for font threading that caused -rc1 to crash on some machines. The stamps installer has that mod to put the stamps in the restricted users private Tux Paint application directory instead of their data directory. This isn't likely to affect many people, but was a good catch from Tore, Thanks John! And thanks in advance for testing this, folks! -- -bill! bi...@ne... http://www.newbreedsoftware.com/ |
|
From: TOYAMA Shin-i. <sh...@wm...> - 2006-10-09 13:55:31
|
RPM packages for rc2 are ready for testing. http://z1.plala.jp/tuxpaint/testing/0.9.16rc2/ a) tuxpaint tuxpaint-0.9.16-2.fc4-fc5.i386.rpm : for Fedora Core 4 - 5 tuxpaint-0.9.16-2.fc1-fc3.i386.rpm : for Fedora Core 1 - 3 tuxpaint-0.9.16-2.rh80-rh9.i386.rpm : for RedHat 8.0 - 9 tuxpaint-0.9.16-2.rh73.i386.rpm : for RedHat 7.3 tuxpaint-0.9.16-2.rh62.i386.rpm : for RedHat 6.2 b) tuxpaint-config tuxpaint-config-0.0.7-2.fc3-fc5.i386.rpm : for Fedora Core 3 - 5 tuxpaint-config-0.0.7-2.rh80-fc2.i386.rpm : for RedHat 8.0 - Fedora Core 2 tuxpaint-config-0.0.7-1.rh73.i386.rpm : for RedHat 7.3 tuxpaint-config-0.0.7-2.rh62.i386.rpm : for RedHat 6.2 c) fltk ( required by tuxpaint-config ) fltk-1.1.7-1.rh80-fc2.i386.rpm : for RedHat 8.0 - Fedora Core 2 fltk-1.1.7-1.rh73.i386.rpm : for RedHat 7.3 (*1) For Fedora Core 3 and later, you can install fltk via "yum" comannd, # yum install fltk (*2) For RedHat 6.2, you need not to install fltk. d) tuxpaint-stamps tuxpaint-stamps-xxx-2006.19.07-1.noarch.rpm : noarch ( There are 16 "xxx" packages ) Bill Kendrick wrote in <200...@so...> > >I've just put together a new set of release candidates. >Tux Paint 0.9.16rc2, TP Config 0.0.7rc2 and TP Stamps 2006.10.07 >are available from my FTP site: > > ftp://ftp.tuxpaint.org/unix/x/tuxpaint/testbuilds/source/ > >Packagers and porters, please let me know what issues are >still preventing final release. (I'm guessing a Mac OS X build >of 0.9.16 won't happen, since there are still some major issues >that will need patching.) > >Thanks! > >-- >-bill! >bi...@ne... >http://www.newbreedsoftware.com/ > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your >opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash >http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV >_______________________________________________ >Tuxpaint-devel mailing list >Tux...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxpaint-devel -- TOYAMA Shin-ichi mailto:sh...@wm... |
|
From: Bill K. <nb...@so...> - 2006-10-09 16:28:37
|
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 10:56:04PM +0900, TOYAMA Shin-ichi wrote: > RPM packages for rc2 are ready for testing. > > http://z1.plala.jp/tuxpaint/testing/0.9.16rc2/ Hi Shin-ichi, thanks. But... You don't have permission to access /tuxpaint/testing/0.9.16rc2/ on this server. Forgot to chmod? :) -bill! |
|
From: Ben A. <sy...@sa...> - 2006-10-09 21:11:37
|
Bill Kendrick wrote: > I've just put together a new set of release candidates. > Tux Paint 0.9.16rc2, TP Config 0.0.7rc2 and TP Stamps 2006.10.07 > are available from my FTP site: > > ftp://ftp.tuxpaint.org/unix/x/tuxpaint/testbuilds/source/ > > Packagers and porters, please let me know what issues are > still preventing final release. (I'm guessing a Mac OS X build > of 0.9.16 won't happen, since there are still some major issues > that will need patching.) > Thanks. I'm working on the Debian package today, and in particular, font support. So far I have: synrg@sanctuary:~/src/tuxpaint$ ls -l /usr/share/tuxpaint/fonts/locale/ total 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 48 Oct 9 17:47 ar.ttf -> ../../../fonts/truetype/ttf-arabeyes/ae_Nice.ttf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 47 Oct 9 17:47 el.ttf -> ../../../fonts/truetype/thryomanes/thryrg__.ttf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 52 Oct 9 17:47 jp.ttf -> ../../../fonts/truetype/sazanami/sazanami-gothic.ttf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 41 Oct 9 17:47 ko.ttf -> ../../../fonts/truetype/baekmuk/gulim.ttf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 54 Oct 9 17:47 ta.ttf -> ../../../fonts/truetype/ttf-tamil-fonts/TSCu_Comic.ttf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 44 Oct 9 17:47 th.ttf -> ../../../fonts/truetype/thai/Garuda-Bold.ttf lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 43 Oct 9 17:47 zh.ttf -> ../../../fonts/truetype/arphic/gbsn00lp.ttf And the corresponding dependencies in tuxpaint-data: Recommends: tuxpaint, ttf-arphic-gbsn00lp, ttf-thryomanes, ttf-kochi-gothic, ttf-baekmuk, ttf-tamil-fonts, xfonts-thai-ttf So in this release, I have fixed Thai and Greek, which were broken in etch/sid, and I have added Arabic and Japanese. I have noticed that there is no Truetype Culmus package in Debian, which contains the Hebrew font we need. Nor is there a package for Tsampa Keyboard, Tuxpaint's Tibetan font. I have asked the Debian font packaging group for the latter. I'll ask the Debian Hebrew packaging team for the former. I don't know what the status of Gia's Georgian font is. Anyone know? Wasn't that going to be added to the Freefont project? And finally, I have no idea what the Vietnamese font is. I see that it's from a package called tcvn2, but I can find no license info in that package, nor embedded in the font file itself. The name "vntime" and the mark on the font that indicates it was authored in Fontographer makes me worry it may have been simply copied from a non-free Times Roman font and all original copyright info was stripped from it. Ben |
|
From: TOYAMA Shin-i. <sh...@wm...> - 2006-10-10 01:06:57
|
Hi! Ben Armstrong wrote in <452...@sa...> >Thanks. I'm working on the Debian package today, and in particular, >font support. So far I have: > >lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 52 Oct 9 17:47 jp.ttf -> >../../../fonts/truetype/sazanami/sazanami-gothic.ttf Japanese locale font is already included in new release because there is a rendering ploblem, caused by SDL_ttf bug, with some fonts including sazanami-gothic.ttf. So, You need not to create symbolic link to Japanese font for Debian package. Thank you! -- TOYAMA Shin-ichi mailto:sh...@wm... |
|
From: Bill K. <nb...@so...> - 2006-10-10 07:37:10
|
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 06:11:23PM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: > > Thanks. I'm working on the Debian package today, Awesome, thanks! :^) <snip> > And finally, I have no idea what the Vietnamese font is. I see that > it's from a package called tcvn2, but I can find no license info in that > package, nor embedded in the font file itself. Hrm, interesting. I assume you found the COPYING.txt in vi_docs/ > The name "vntime" and > the mark on the font that indicates it was authored in Fontographer > makes me worry it may have been simply copied from a non-free Times > Roman font and all original copyright info was stripped from it. Ack >:^( Ok, so I'll pull it for now, just to be safe. Perhaps this would be a good replacement? http://www.aimwell.org/Fonts/fonts.html Verajja, specifically: "derived from Bitstream Vera, a font released under a generous license agreement." So status so far: ar - check bo - you're asking Debian font pkging group for Tsampa el - check he - you're asking Debian Hebrew pkging group for Culmus hi - ??? jp - as Shin-Ichi said, needs to use his hacked version ka - status unknown ko - check ta - check th - check vi - need to find Free replacement zh_tw - check Thanks! -- -bill! bi...@ne... http://www.newbreedsoftware.com/ |
|
From: Ben A. <sy...@sa...> - 2006-10-16 18:59:45
|
As indicated in the Chinese fonts discussion, I really have no need for these subset fonts in my Debian package, where a good full font alternative exists. What is the status of the TTF bug (URLs please?) that our customized version works around? Could it be fixed in the latest versions of TTF packages in Debian/sid? I could test this if I know what problems to look for. I'd really rather not include *any* fonts in the tuxpaint-data package in Debian, so if I could go back to using the full ttf-sazanami-gothic package, that would be great. And if we're not ready to do that today, I'd at least like to track the bug so I can eventually switch to using a non-customized font when it is fixed. Ben TOYAMA Shin-ichi wrote: > Thank you bill, > > Ben, > > ja.ttf in tuxpaint-0.9.16 is a simple and very small subset of > sazanami-gothic.ttf. > > ----- From "fonts/locale/ja_docs/COPYING.txt ----------------- > > Sazanami-Gothic-noBitmap-noKanji.ttf (Custumized for TuxPaint) > > This is a custumized subset of Sazanami-Gothic.ttf for TuxPaint. > Difference between original are, > > a) Bitmap data which prevent correct rendering (due to SDL_ttf > bug) are removed. > b) All Kanji data not used in TuxPaint are removed. > |
|
From: TOYAMA Shin-i. <sh...@wm...> - 2006-10-17 00:32:31
|
Hi! Ben Armstrong wrote in <453...@sa...> >What is the status of the TTF bug (URLs please?) that our customized >version works around? Could it be fixed in the latest versions of TTF >packages in Debian/sid? See bugzilla for SDL_ttf http://bugzilla.libsdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190 -- TOYAMA Shin-ichi mailto:sh...@wm... |
|
From: Ben A. <sy...@sa...> - 2006-10-17 01:54:54
|
TOYAMA Shin-ichi wrote: > See bugzilla for SDL_ttf > > http://bugzilla.libsdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190 > Thanks! I'll file a bug against the Debian tuxpaint-data package to track this issue and resolve it by the eventual replacement of ja.ttf in tuxpaint-data with a symlink and dependency on ttf-sazanami-gothic once this SDL_ttf bug is resolved. Ben |
|
From: TOYAMA Shin-i. <sh...@wm...> - 2006-10-09 22:47:51
|
Bill Kendrick wrote in <200...@so...> > You don't have permission to access /tuxpaint/testing/0.9.16rc2/ on this > server. > >Forgot to chmod? :) Sorry! I've added '+Indexes' option to this directory. -- TOYAMA Shin-ichi mailto:sh...@wm... |
|
From: Bill K. <nb...@so...> - 2006-10-10 00:43:33
|
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 07:48:25AM +0900, TOYAMA Shin-ichi wrote: > Sorry! > > I've added '+Indexes' option to this directory. Thanks :) -bill! |
|
From: Bill K. <nb...@so...> - 2006-10-10 04:53:53
|
<snip: about RPMs of Tux Paint 0.9.16rc2 & friends...> Oh, and btw, these are now available from tuxpaint.org FTP, too: ftp://ftp.billsgames.com/unix/x/tuxpaint/testbuilds/rpm/ -bill! |
|
From: Ben A. <sy...@sa...> - 2006-10-10 12:17:47
|
Bill Kendrick wrote: > Hrm, interesting. I assume you found the COPYING.txt in vi_docs/ > Yeah. And there's nothing helpful there, either. > http://www.aimwell.org/Fonts/fonts.html > > Verajja, specifically: "derived from Bitstream Vera, a font released > under a generous license agreement." > > Looks promising. Do we have someone who knows the language to verify it looks OK? > So status so far: > > ar - check > bo - you're asking Debian font pkging group for Tsampa > el - check > he - you're asking Debian Hebrew pkging group for Culmus > I just sent off a note this morning. > hi - ??? > There is a ttf-devanagari-fonts package in Debian, but there is no font named Raghu or Raghindi in it. There are just these: ttf-devanagari-fonts: usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-devanagari-fonts/Gargi_1.7.ttf ttf-devanagari-fonts: usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-devanagari-fonts/chandas1-1.ttf ttf-devanagari-fonts: usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-devanagari-fonts/kalimati.ttf ttf-devanagari-fonts: usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-devanagari-fonts/lohit_hi.ttf ttf-devanagari-fonts: usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-devanagari-fonts/samanata.ttf > jp - as Shin-Ichi said, needs to use his hacked version > This still should go into a separate font package so that others can use it, and my preference would be that it goes into the existing package in Debian. > ka - status unknown > I guess this is an indication that Gia's font is already in ttf-freefont: https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/ttf-freefont/+bug/45898 And currently in sid there is version 20060501cvs-8. So all we have to do is try it. > vi - need to find Free replacement > If you decide on the font you've suggested, I'll see if I can find someone in Debian to package it. Ben |
|
From: Bill K. <nb...@so...> - 2006-10-10 17:48:26
|
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 09:17:35AM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: > > Looks promising. Do we have someone who knows the language to verify it > looks OK? I did a cursory glance. Looked fine. :) Gotta run, -bill! |
|
From: Ben A. <sy...@sa...> - 2006-10-10 12:24:25
|
Ben Armstrong wrote: > There is a ttf-devanagari-fonts package in Debian, but there is no font > named Raghu or Raghindi in it. There are just these: > I have emailed the maintainers (Debian-IN Team <deb...@li...>) to ask for help packaging this. Ben |
|
From: Bill K. <nb...@so...> - 2006-10-10 20:43:08
|
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 09:17:35AM -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: > > jp - as Shin-Ichi said, needs to use his hacked version > > > This still should go into a separate font package so that others can use > it, and my preference would be that it goes into the existing package in > Debian. I forget (don't have CHANGES.txt in front of me), is the Japanese font for Tux Paint scaled down to only apply to the characters used in Tux Paint (like the Chinese font)? If so, you may need to ask Shin-Ichi for a 'fixed' font that includes all characters... unless you were thinking of packaging this as a tuxpaint-specific font deb pkg...? > > vi - need to find Free replacement > > > If you decide on the font you've suggested, I'll see if I can find > someone in Debian to package it. cvs update ;) -bill! |
|
From: TOYAMA Shin-i. <sh...@wm...> - 2006-10-10 22:38:35
|
Thank you bill,
Ben,
ja.ttf in tuxpaint-0.9.16 is a simple and very small subset of
sazanami-gothic.ttf.
----- From "fonts/locale/ja_docs/COPYING.txt -----------------
Sazanami-Gothic-noBitmap-noKanji.ttf (Custumized for TuxPaint)
This is a custumized subset of Sazanami-Gothic.ttf for TuxPaint.
Difference between original are,
a) Bitmap data which prevent correct rendering (due to SDL_ttf
bug) are removed.
b) All Kanji data not used in TuxPaint are removed.
---------------------------------------------------------------
So, I think it doesn't make too much sense to prepare separate
font package of it.
Thank you.
Bill Kendrick wrote in <200...@so...>
>I forget (don't have CHANGES.txt in front of me), is the Japanese font
>for Tux Paint scaled down to only apply to the characters used in Tux Paint
>(like the Chinese font)? If so, you may need to ask Shin-Ichi for a 'fixed'
>font that includes all characters... unless you were thinking of packaging
>this as a tuxpaint-specific font deb pkg...?
--
TOYAMA Shin-ichi mailto:sh...@wm...
|
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X