[Tuxpaint-devel] The *purge* was Re: the Sugar port

[Caroline F. <car...@go...>]

On Sat, 2007-12-29 at 14:14 -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> On Dec 29, 2007 1:50 PM, Bill Kendrick <nb...@so...> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 03:03:50AM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> > > First of all, it runs.
> > > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Tux_Paint
> >
> > Awesome.  Is it worth mirroring the binary over on SF.net and adding an XO
> > page to the main TP website?  (I'd of course link to the wiki there, too.)
> 
> I doubt it, as I'm likely to be making updates soonish.
> Am I able to update files on the website?
> 
> Definitely add a link.
> 
> > > Tux Paint has an excess of low-quality brushes, stamps,
> > > and magic tools. Perhaps a disinterested 3rd party should
> > > tell us what to throw away.
> >
> > I'm happy leaving it to you to decide.
> 
> I'm sure! Throwing away somebody else's stuff is a
> great source of conflict. Some of my own stuff might
> even need to go; will I be too lenient or too harsh?

Arrgh. How do you know we have too much stuff? I've been making things
like brushes and stamps presuming that we can never really have too
much. 

Is this just a packaging problem? There is a bug/complaint on the Ubuntu
bug tracker that -stamps is too big and a request that we split it into
-stamps-default and stamps-*. Would this help or do you think we need to
find an uninterested party? We could try and find some way of doing
community blood letting but I'm sure I can be as possessive about my
stuff as anyone else..

Caroline