Re: [Tuxpaint-devel] the Sugar port

[Bill K. <nb...@so...>]

On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 02:14:48PM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> 
> I doubt it, as I'm likely to be making updates soonish.
> Am I able to update files on the website?

The website is in CVS ("tuxpaint-website" module), but the live version
would of course need to be brought up to date, as it lives on my server.


> Definitely add a link.

Well, I mirrored the current rev, and put a page up.  I'm happy to update
SF.net as new releases come out.  Any reason for the '-1' version #?
Is that an XO requirement?

<snip>
> > I'm happy leaving it to you to decide.
> 
> I'm sure! Throwing away somebody else's stuff is a
> great source of conflict. Some of my own stuff might
> even need to go; will I be too lenient or too harsh?

The curse of the volunteer! ;)  _I'm_ certainly not a disinterested party.
Blah.


<snip>
> > Why did the XO build not find them?
> 
> I have no idea, except that paths are weird.

Likely.  Ok.


> It's not nice having this switch at all. I can see a need
> to limit the number of system fonts in case there is not
> enough memory. If crashes are the problem, I could add
> some crash protection on systems with fork().

As you wish! :)


-- 
-bill!
bi...@ne...
http://www.newbreedsoftware.com/