[Tuxpaint-users] two questions

[Cindy B. <cb...@pd...>]

Is there a way (or will there be in the future) to save tuxpaint creations
as a jpg?
Also, is there a way to select what printer you want it to print to (on a
mac)? It just uses your default printer the way we are using it.
Thanks!
------------------------
Cindy Brock
Lower Elementary Technology Coach
Yearbook Coordinator

Presbyterian Day School
Memphis, TN
901-842-4622
cb...@pd...

Presbyterian Day School strives to glorify God by developing boys in wisdom
and stature and favor with God and man.

Follow me <http://www.twitter.com/cindybrock>       My
Blog<http://itscindybrock.blogspot.com/>



On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 8:55 AM, <
tux...@li...> wrote:

> Send Tuxpaint-users mailing list submissions to
>        tux...@li...
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxpaint-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        tux...@li...
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        tux...@li...
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Tuxpaint-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Tuxpaint-users Digest, Vol 40, Issue 1 (Stephen Voss)
>   2. Re: Packages for Windows suggestions (Was Re:     Tuxpaint-users
>      Digest, Vol 40, Issue 1) (Bill Kendrick)
>   3. Wikipedia entry needs an update (henry taylor)
>   4. [fwd] Announcing Google Code-in (Bill Kendrick)
>   5. Re: Packages for Windows suggestions (Was Re: Tuxpaint-users
>      Digest, Vol 40, Issue 1) (Ann Reigle)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 08:58:39 -0400
> From: "Stephen Voss" <vo...@pa...>
> Subject: Re: [Tuxpaint-users] Tuxpaint-users Digest, Vol 40, Issue 1
> To: <tux...@li...>
> Message-ID:
>        <
> 74A...@PB...>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> There should not be a separate program and stamps package.  There should be
> a tuxpaint "slim" package and a tuxpaint "full" package(with the stamps
> included). Also there should be an MSI installer file for mass deployments
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/ms-tnef
> Size: 3267 bytes
> Desc: not available
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 13:01:36 -0700
> From: Bill Kendrick <nb...@so...>
> Subject: Re: [Tuxpaint-users] Packages for Windows suggestions (Was
>        Re:     Tuxpaint-users Digest, Vol 40, Issue 1)
> To: Discussion list for parents and teachers using Tux Paint
>        <tux...@li...>
> Cc: Tux Paint <tux...@li...>
> Message-ID: <201...@so...>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:58:39AM -0400, Stephen Voss wrote:
> > There should not be a separate program and stamps package.
>
> We do this to help users try Tux Paint out without having
> to download _everything_, as the stamps collection is large,
> and will only continue to grow.
>
>
> > There should be a tuxpaint "slim" package and a tuxpaint "full"
> > package(with the stamps included). Also there should be an MSI
> > installer file for mass deployments
>
> I suppose that's not a bad idea.  Without knowing how many people
> would avoid trying out Tux Paint without there being a
> 'stamp-less' stand-alone version, I'm hesitant to remove that
> option, but since most people eventually DO want the stamps,
> and many more people have high speed Internet connections these
> days (versus 8 years ago), having a 'full' package is probably
> a good idea.
>
> I'm not familiar with MSI, nor whether or not our current system
> can or can't be used for mass deployments.  Can you (or someone)
> provide more info?  Also, are you familiar with the "/SILENT"
> option that our current installer packages support?  (And does
> that not provide a solution?)
>
> Thanks for your feedback!
>
> -bill!
> Cc'ing tuxpaint-devel
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 16:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
> From: henry taylor <tor...@ya...>
> Subject: [Tuxpaint-users] Wikipedia entry needs an update
> To: Discussion list for parents and teachers using Tux Paint
>        <tux...@li...>
> Message-ID: <157...@we...>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tux_Paint
>
> Selected Milestone releases
>        * 2002.06.16 (June 16, 2002) - Initial release (brushes, stamps,
> lines,
> eraser), two days after coding started
>        * 2002.06.30 (June 30, 2002) - First Magic tools added (blur,
> blocks, negative)
>        * 2002.07.31 (July 31, 2002) - Localization support added
>        * 0.9.11 (June 17, 2003) - Right-to-left support, UTF-8 support in
> Text tool
>        * 0.9.14 (October 12, 2004) - Tux Paint Config. configuration tool
> released,
> Starter image support
>        * 0.9.16 (October 21, 2006) - Slideshow feature, animated and
> directional
> brushes
>        * 0.9.17 (July 1, 2007) - Arbitrary screen size and orientation
> support, SVG support, input method support
>        * 0.9.18 (November 21, 2007) - Magic Tools turned into plug-ins,
> Pango text
> rendering
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 18:23:59 -0700
> From: Bill Kendrick <nb...@so...>
> Subject: [Tuxpaint-users] [fwd] Announcing Google Code-in
> To: Tux Paint <tux...@li...>,   Tux Paint Users
>        <tux...@li...>
> Message-ID: <201...@so...>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> The Tux Paint project, as part of the larger Tux4Kids organization,
> has taken place in Google's "Summer of Code" program for the past
> few years.
>
> The program below, like their "Highly Open Participation" (GHOP),
> which was a way to get high school students involved in open source
> projects.  GSOC is for programming projects, while GHOP was for other
> aspects (documentation, art, etc.)  It seems that this new "Code-In"
> program is like the two programs combined (programming projects for
> high schoolers).
>
> I haven't looked into it closely, but I'm betting Tux Paint and
> the other Tux4Kids projects would benefit from participating.
> In any case, there might folks out here who are interested to
> know about this outside of Tux4Kids' involvement.  (e.g., educators,
> parents who have older kids, etc.)
>
> Enjoy & have a nice weekend!
>
> -bill!
>
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Carol Smith -----
>
> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 11:27:22 -0700
> From: Carol Smith
> Subject: Announcing Google Code-in
>
>
>   Hi everyone,
>
>   We*re pleased to announce that we are planning to run the Google Code-in
>   contest starting this November. This is a contest modelled on the success
>   of our pilot program the Google Highly Open Participation Contest that
> was
>   run in 2007-08. We will again be giving 13-18 year old students around
> the
>   world an opportunity to get involved with open source projects doing
> tasks
>   ranging from documentation to outreach to coding programs.
>
>   We*re looking forward to a fun contest this year and hope you*ll consider
>   participating yourself if you are eligible or spread the word to friends,
>   family, and colleagues about the program. Please check out the timeline
>   [0] for more details on the program.
>
>   We encourage you to join the Google Code-in contest discussion list [1]
>   and announcement list [2].
>
>   Please see our blog post [3] for further details and contact me directly
>   if you have specific questions that aren*t answered in the FAQs [4].
>
>   [0] - http://code.google.com/opensource/gci/2010-11/faqs.html#tlq1
>   [1] - http://groups.google.com/group/gci-discuss
>   [2] - http://groups.google.com/group/gci-announce
>   [3] -
> http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2010/10/google-code-in-schools-out-codes-in.html
>   [4] - http://code.google.com/opensource/gci/2010-11/faqs.html
>
>   Cheers,
>   The Google OSPO Team
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
>
> --
> -bill!
> Sent from my computer
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:34:45 -0400
> From: "Ann Reigle" <re...@mh...>
> Subject: Re: [Tuxpaint-users] Packages for Windows suggestions (Was
>        Re: Tuxpaint-users Digest, Vol 40, Issue 1)
> To: "Discussion list for parents and teachers using Tux Paint"
>        <tux...@li...>
> Cc: Tux Paint <tux...@li...>
> Message-ID: <4CB...@mh...>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I would like to be able to buy a package with all the stamps for
> Macinstosh.  I'd need this on a DVD to be able to give to our IT department
> to be able to create an 'image' for the next school year.  I would buy an
> upgrade for the following year as more stamps are developed.  In other
> words, one package of all together would be great.  In this way, we don't
> rely  on the internet to download anything or need the internet to use
> wonderful, marvelous TuxPaint - Thanks, Ann
>
>
> Ann Reigle
> Technology Facilitator
> Memorial Hall
> 717-520-2435
> re...@mh...
>
>
>
> >>> Bill Kendrick <nb...@so...> 10/08/10 4:01 PM >>>
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:58:39AM -0400, Stephen Voss wrote:
> > There should not be a separate program and stamps package.
>
> We do this to help users try Tux Paint out without having
> to download _everything_, as the stamps collection is large,
> and will only continue to grow.
>
>
> > There should be a tuxpaint "slim" package and a tuxpaint "full"
> > package(with the stamps included). Also there should be an MSI
> > installer file for mass deployments
>
> I suppose that's not a bad idea.  Without knowing how many people
> would avoid trying out Tux Paint without there being a
> 'stamp-less' stand-alone version, I'm hesitant to remove that
> option, but since most people eventually DO want the stamps,
> and many more people have high speed Internet connections these
> days (versus 8 years ago), having a 'full' package is probably
> a good idea.
>
> I'm not familiar with MSI, nor whether or not our current system
> can or can't be used for mass deployments.  Can you (or someone)
> provide more info?  Also, are you familiar with the "/SILENT"
> option that our current installer packages support?  (And does
> that not provide a solution?)
>
> Thanks for your feedback!
>
> -bill!
> Cc'ing tuxpaint-devel
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
> standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
> Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
> experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
> _______________________________________________
> Tuxpaint-users mailing list
> Tux...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxpaint-users
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
> standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
> Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
> experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tuxpaint-users mailing list
> Tux...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxpaint-users
>
>
> End of Tuxpaint-users Digest, Vol 40, Issue 2
> *********************************************
>