On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 23:59:51 -0700
Bill Kendrick <nb...@so...> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 07:56:24AM +0100, Caroline Ford wrote:
> > That can be 0.9.21?
> >
> > I'm not sure Ben can release without a new version?
>
> Well, ok, perhaps you can convince me.
...
> So perhaps I should just start asking everyone to see whether things work
> ok for them, and then we can get 0.9.20 out the door soon. Perhaps end
> of this week?
That would be superb. I'm going to continue packaging with what I have
checked out from CVS. Yes, while there are ways around a new release,
they are ugly. At the very least, it would mean that our .orig.tar.gz
would not match upstream's, which means the users won't really know
what it is we're distributing without tearing it apart and checking
for themselvves. So if we could work towards a maintenance release
later this week, I'll put the revised copyright file aggregating all
the font copyrights by the ftpmasters to ensure we won't end up with
another rejection.
Thanks,
Ben
--
,-. nSLUG http://www.nslug.ns.ca sy...@sa...
\`' Debian http://www.debian.org sy...@de...
` [ gpg 395C F3A4 35D3 D247 1387 2D9E 5A94 F3CA 0B27 13C8 ]
[ pgp 7F DA 09 4B BA 2C 0D E0 1B B1 31 ED C6 A9 39 4F ]
|