tuxmath-devel — TuxMath developer's mailing list.

[Tuxmath-devel] Impending Tux Math 2.0.0 release

[David B. <dav...@gm...>]

Hi,

I think t4k_common-0.1.1 is ready for release, and tuxmath 2.0.0 (as I
finally decided to number it) is very close. The "new-art" images look
great, and the first set has been merged into master.  The windows
crossbuild builds correctly and AFAICT works fine, including network
play.

One remaining and fairly obvious issue is that the "Factors" variant
of Factoroids is unplayably broken  I think we should leave out that
menu entry for the time being.

Also, I have discovered that tuxmath now segfaults if started on a
machine without a working sound system (such as the current status of
my main home Debian Sid desktop, which got somewhat borked in a big
apt-get upgrade last weekend).  This happens even if started as
"tuxmath --nosound".  Also, the "--nosound" option no longer turns off
the sound, anyway.  From a quick test, tuxmath-1.8.0 runs without
crashing on the same machine.

I hope to have time tomorrow to post a release of t4k_common-0.1.1,
and "pre" or "rc" releases of tuxmath itself.  I'm planning on next
Monday (11 Apr) for the "official" release. If any translators out
there want to get last-minute updates of any new strings into the new
release, now is the time.

Best,

David

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Personalized, adaptive game-play to improve learning in Tuxmath

[Brendan L. <bm...@ri...>]

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Caroline Ford <car...@gm...
> wrote:

> I thought we didn't make the summer of code this year?
>

That's correct. This year will be the Tux4Kids Summer of Integration and
Cleanup :/

-Brendan

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Personalized, adaptive game-play to improve learning in Tuxmath

[Caroline F. <car...@gm...>]

I thought we didn't make the summer of code this year?

Caroline

Sent from a mobile device.

On 7 Apr 2011, at 16:44, Tim Holy <ho...@wu...> wrote:

> Hi Siddarth,
> 
> On Thursday, April 07, 2011 10:21:36 am Siddharth Kothari wrote:
>> If the devs. of Tuxmath agree, I plan to submit a SoC proposal on the idea
>> of providing "an adaptive game-play to improve learning" in Tuxmath under
>> PSU <http://summer.cs.pdx.edu/ideas>. The reason for choosing PSU is that
>> they focus on academic-oriented projects and consider how valuable the the
>> project could be to the larger open source community.
>> 
>> *Short description*: Tux, of Math command is an open-source educational
>> game for learning Mathematics. Since the game is quite popular and used by
>> many schools, my idea focuses on improving the learning of a
>> player/student by providing a personalized, adaptive game-play. This is
>> done by modelling the student's knowledge state using a Bayesian network.
>> This also helps a teacher/supervisor to be provided with a detailed
>> assessment about a particular student's strengths and weaknesses in
>> individual concepts (read lessons).
> 
> I think this is an interesting idea. Tuxmath currently has a form of 
> "feedback," adjusting the comet speed depending on how the student has 
> performed recently. But it is very primitive (I can say that because I wrote 
> it myself :-) ). There is plenty of room for improvement, and the idea of 
> using Bayesian methods has potential.
> 
> Currently, I think the general principle is that:
> 1. Adaptive mechanisms are desirable in the "training academy" lessons;
> 2. The arcade games are supposed to be an absolute scale, and so there should 
> not be any mechanisms that adjust task difficulty. In principle, you could get 
> around this by adjusting how tuxmath does scoring, but I would be very 
> cautious about doing this until you have considerable confidence that you can 
> measure performance accurately. So you would want to disable any fancy 
> mechanisms in the arcade games.
> 
> Another thing you should know about is the tux4kids-admin project, which is 
> designed to build infrastructure for teachers to use tux4kids in more of a 
> "lesson" environment. I implemented a first stab at this, but it never got to 
> the point of being very user-friendly. There has been a more recent effort at 
> it, but I am not sure of its current status. But you may want to take a peek 
> at that work to see how your thoughts might relate.
> 
> In any event, I like this general direction of investigation, but I cannot 
> promise to be able to supply mentoring time---I haven't had time for tux4kids 
> for far longer than I'd like, and so I won't make any promises.
> 
> Best,
> --Tim
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Xperia(TM) PLAY
> It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming
> smartphone on the nation's most reliable network.
> And it wants your games.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev
> _______________________________________________
> Tuxmath-devel mailing list
> Tux...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxmath-devel

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Personalized, adaptive game-play to improve learning in Tuxmath

[Tim H. <ho...@wu...>]

Hi Siddarth,

On Thursday, April 07, 2011 10:21:36 am Siddharth Kothari wrote:
> If the devs. of Tuxmath agree, I plan to submit a SoC proposal on the idea
> of providing "an adaptive game-play to improve learning" in Tuxmath under
> PSU <http://summer.cs.pdx.edu/ideas>. The reason for choosing PSU is that
> they focus on academic-oriented projects and consider how valuable the the
> project could be to the larger open source community.
> 
> *Short description*: Tux, of Math command is an open-source educational
> game for learning Mathematics. Since the game is quite popular and used by
> many schools, my idea focuses on improving the learning of a
> player/student by providing a personalized, adaptive game-play. This is
> done by modelling the student's knowledge state using a Bayesian network.
> This also helps a teacher/supervisor to be provided with a detailed
> assessment about a particular student's strengths and weaknesses in
> individual concepts (read lessons).

I think this is an interesting idea. Tuxmath currently has a form of 
"feedback," adjusting the comet speed depending on how the student has 
performed recently. But it is very primitive (I can say that because I wrote 
it myself :-) ). There is plenty of room for improvement, and the idea of 
using Bayesian methods has potential.

Currently, I think the general principle is that:
1. Adaptive mechanisms are desirable in the "training academy" lessons;
2. The arcade games are supposed to be an absolute scale, and so there should 
not be any mechanisms that adjust task difficulty. In principle, you could get 
around this by adjusting how tuxmath does scoring, but I would be very 
cautious about doing this until you have considerable confidence that you can 
measure performance accurately. So you would want to disable any fancy 
mechanisms in the arcade games.

Another thing you should know about is the tux4kids-admin project, which is 
designed to build infrastructure for teachers to use tux4kids in more of a 
"lesson" environment. I implemented a first stab at this, but it never got to 
the point of being very user-friendly. There has been a more recent effort at 
it, but I am not sure of its current status. But you may want to take a peek 
at that work to see how your thoughts might relate.

In any event, I like this general direction of investigation, but I cannot 
promise to be able to supply mentoring time---I haven't had time for tux4kids 
for far longer than I'd like, and so I won't make any promises.

Best,
--Tim

[Tuxmath-devel] Personalized, adaptive game-play to improve learning in Tuxmath

[Siddharth K. <sid...@gm...>]

Hi everyone,

If the devs. of Tuxmath agree, I plan to submit a SoC proposal on the idea
of providing "an adaptive game-play to improve learning" in Tuxmath under
PSU <http://summer.cs.pdx.edu/ideas>. The reason for choosing PSU is that
they focus on academic-oriented projects and consider how valuable the the
project could be to the larger open source community.

*Short description*: Tux, of Math command is an open-source educational game
for learning Mathematics. Since the game is quite popular and used by many
schools, my idea focuses on improving the learning of a player/student by
providing a personalized, adaptive game-play. This is done by modelling the
student's knowledge state using a Bayesian network. This also helps a
teacher/supervisor to be provided with a detailed assessment about a
particular student's strengths and weaknesses in individual concepts (read
lessons).

If this idea adds value to the tux community, I would like to work on it
irrespective of whether I make it into SoC, though time would be a
constraint. Do let me know your opinions.

Thanks,
Siddharth

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Next version about ready

[Brendan L. <che...@gm...>]

Teach 'em hexadecimal! 1.a.0!

Just kidding. I think 2.0.0 is fine.

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Aviral Dasgupta <avi...@gm...> wrote:

> I'd say, switch to a date-versioning scheme. eg. 11.04 for something
> released in April 2011. Conveys more information.
>
> Regards,
> Aviral
>
>
>
> On 4 April 2011 10:12, David Bruce <dav...@gm...> wrote:
>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> AFAICT the current git version of tuxmath is about ready to be
>> released.  Barring a major attack of procrastination, I should release
>> something in about a week.  I just want to get the docs and other
>> ancillary stuff updated.
>>
>> So, for any translators out there, it would be nice to check the
>> current po files for untranslated strings before the release.
>>
>> One question - the last release was 1.9.0.  We don't have a very
>> strict version numbering scheme, but I have generally bumped the
>> middle number when we add non-trivial user-visible features.  The new
>> version has some very visible enhancements in the network game,
>> Factoroids, and the main comet game (super-bonus comets that earn a
>> powerup that zaps everything on the screen).
>>
>> For our target audience, I think "1.10.0" would be confusing, so how
>> does "Tux Math 2.0.0" sound?
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
>> Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself;
>> WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and
>> publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tuxmath-devel mailing list
>> Tux...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxmath-devel
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
> Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself;
> WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and
> publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tuxmath-devel mailing list
> Tux...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxmath-devel
>
>

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Next version about ready

[Aviral D. <avi...@gm...>]

I'd say, switch to a date-versioning scheme. eg. 11.04 for something
released in April 2011. Conveys more information.

Regards,
Aviral



On 4 April 2011 10:12, David Bruce <dav...@gm...> wrote:

> Hi Folks,
>
> AFAICT the current git version of tuxmath is about ready to be
> released.  Barring a major attack of procrastination, I should release
> something in about a week.  I just want to get the docs and other
> ancillary stuff updated.
>
> So, for any translators out there, it would be nice to check the
> current po files for untranslated strings before the release.
>
> One question - the last release was 1.9.0.  We don't have a very
> strict version numbering scheme, but I have generally bumped the
> middle number when we add non-trivial user-visible features.  The new
> version has some very visible enhancements in the network game,
> Factoroids, and the main comet game (super-bonus comets that earn a
> powerup that zaps everything on the screen).
>
> For our target audience, I think "1.10.0" would be confusing, so how
> does "Tux Math 2.0.0" sound?
>
> David
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Create and publish websites with WebMatrix
> Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself;
> WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and
> publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf
> _______________________________________________
> Tuxmath-devel mailing list
> Tux...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxmath-devel
>

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Next version about ready

[Xandru A. <xa...@so...>]

>
> For our target audience, I think "1.10.0" would be confusing, so how
> does "Tux Math 2.0.0" sound?
>

It's cool. Absolutely better than 1.10.0.

Cheers

[Tuxmath-devel] Next version about ready

[David B. <dav...@gm...>]

Hi Folks,

AFAICT the current git version of tuxmath is about ready to be
released.  Barring a major attack of procrastination, I should release
something in about a week.  I just want to get the docs and other
ancillary stuff updated.

So, for any translators out there, it would be nice to check the
current po files for untranslated strings before the release.

One question - the last release was 1.9.0.  We don't have a very
strict version numbering scheme, but I have generally bumped the
middle number when we add non-trivial user-visible features.  The new
version has some very visible enhancements in the network game,
Factoroids, and the main comet game (super-bonus comets that earn a
powerup that zaps everything on the screen).

For our target audience, I think "1.10.0" would be confusing, so how
does "Tux Math 2.0.0" sound?

David

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] trial and error method

[Xandru A. <xa...@so...>]

I agree Bruce, is a good way.
I like your "dark" option too :) but not for my students.
El 24/03/2011 20:51, "David Bruce" <dav...@gm...> escribió:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Xandru Armesto <xa...@so...>
wrote:
>> Hi:
>>
>> I've been watching my students playing with TuxMath in classroom
(primary)
>> and I've noticed that some children one solve operations by trial and
error
>> (just on lower levels, of course).
>> I think that a possible feature for TuxMath could be a "temperature
sensor
>> laser" witch increase when you fail a lot of shots and decrease when you
do
>> well. If the sensor reaches a certain temperature shoot won't be possible
>> for a certain time.
>>
>> What do you think? Is this possible? Any other solution?
>
> I've thought about having the player lose points for misses, which is
> probably the best way. Having misses affect gameplay, as you suggest,
> would make it more effective. We should do something like that.
>
> I've also thought of more drastic approaches, like having wrong
> answers result in a laser "misfire" that zaps one of the player's
> igloos or penguins, but I think that would be too "dark" for our
> intended audience ;)
>
> David

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] trial and error method

[David B. <dav...@gm...>]

Hi,

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Xandru Armesto <xa...@so...> wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I've been watching my students playing with TuxMath in classroom (primary)
> and I've noticed that some children one solve operations by trial and error
> (just on lower levels, of course).
> I think that a possible feature for TuxMath could be a "temperature sensor
> laser" witch increase when you fail a lot of shots and decrease when you do
> well. If the sensor reaches a certain temperature shoot won't be possible
> for a certain time.
>
> What do you think? Is this possible? Any other solution?

I've thought about having the player lose points for misses, which is
probably the best way.  Having misses affect gameplay, as you suggest,
would make it more effective.  We should do something like that.

I've also thought of more drastic approaches, like having wrong
answers result in a laser "misfire" that zaps one of the player's
igloos or penguins, but I think that would be too "dark" for our
intended audience ;)

David

[Tuxmath-devel] trial and error method

[Xandru A. <xa...@so...>]

Hi:

I've been watching my students playing with TuxMath in classroom (primary)
and I've noticed that some children one solve operations by trial and error
(just on lower levels, of course).
I think that a possible feature for TuxMath could be a "temperature sensor
laser" witch increase when you fail a lot of shots and decrease when you do
well. If the sensor reaches a certain temperature shoot won't be possible
for a certain time.

What do you think? Is this possible? Any other solution?

Cheers.

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Question about Tux of Math

[David B. <dav...@gm...>]

Hi Cheryl,

> Our problem is that the Tux of Math program runs too fast for him.

For the lessons ("Math Command Training Academy"), you can speed up or
slow down the program using the up and down arrow keys.  You can also
pause the program by typing 'p'.  These options are disabled for the
"Arcade" games, where the goal is to beat the highest score.

>  Is there anyway to change the settings to allow for 1 math problem to pop
> up on the screen at a time verse multiple questions appearing?

The question lists and gameplay are extremely customizable if you
like.  To play a customized game rather than one of the many bundled
lessons, you would edit the custom game settings to your liking, by
editing the options file in your tuxmath home directory. On a Windows
system, this is:

C:\Documents And Settings\USER\Application Data\TuxMath\options.txt,

(substituting the actual user name for USER, of course).

Open this file with a text editor (e.g. notepad), and look for where
it says "max_comets = 10", and change it to say "max_comets = 1", and
save it.  Then, if you play a "Custom Game" (go to "Play Alone", then
"Play Custom Game"), there will only be one comet on the screen at a
time.

(If you are happily using Linux, the tuxmath home directory is simply
".tuxmath" under your home directory).
If you like, you can modify all the bundled lessons in the same way.
The config files are all stored under data/missions wherever tuxmath
was installed, and they are all human-readable and modifiable.

(Note, however, that most Windows apps, including Notepad, will not
correctly handle Unix linebreaks, so the text config files will appear
to have one extremely long line).

Hope that helps,

David Bruce

[Tuxmath-devel] Question about Tux of Math

[Freeburn, C. <cfr...@ha...>]

Good morning:
 
I work at Pentucket Lake Elementary School and work in a DS classroom.  
 
We have a child who loves math!  
 
Our problem is that the Tux of Math program runs too fast for him.  Is
there anyway to change the settings to allow for 1 math problem to pop
up on the screen at a time verse multiple questions appearing?
 
 
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
 
Thank you
 
Sherry - ESP 

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] New Artwork

[David B. <dav...@gm...>]

Hi,

On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Brendan Luchen <che...@gm...>wrote:

> Awesome!
>

Agreed, looks really good! Remember that we want to use svg for scalability
- hopefully that won't be a problem for Teejay.  We have been able to
convert png files to svg, however, although I don't remember offhand just
how we did that.

David

[Tuxmath-devel] Latest Revision of TuxMath is Broken

[Aviral D. <avi...@gm...>]

Linking C executable tuxmath
CMakeFiles/tuxmath.dir/menu.c.o: In function `run_lan_join':
menu.c:(.text+0xd48): undefined reference to `ConnectToServer'
menu.c:(.text+0xdbb): undefined reference to `Pregame'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [src/tuxmath] Error 1
make[1]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/tuxmath.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2

Regards,
Aviral

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Tux4Kids not accepted for GSoC 2011

[deepak a. <dee...@gm...>]

David
Hmm sad that our application isn't accepted this year but life goes on
like that.
So don't be sad
cheers
Deepak :-)

On 3/19/11, David Bruce <dav...@gm...> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just received the unhappy news that our application for GSoC was not
> accepted this year.  The email was very terse, with no explanation
> other than "this year we received many more applications than we were
> willing to accommodate".  Our application was very similar to the
> successful applications from 2008, 2009, and 2010.  I will try to find
> out more, but as it stands now, it looks like we won't be a part of
> GSoC this year.
>
> :(
>
> David Bruce
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
> A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
> for your organization - today and in the future.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
> _______________________________________________
> Tuxmath-devel mailing list
> Tux...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxmath-devel
>

[Tuxmath-devel] Tux4Kids not accepted for GSoC 2011

[David B. <dav...@gm...>]

Hello,

I just received the unhappy news that our application for GSoC was not
accepted this year.  The email was very terse, with no explanation
other than "this year we received many more applications than we were
willing to accommodate".  Our application was very similar to the
successful applications from 2008, 2009, and 2010.  I will try to find
out more, but as it stands now, it looks like we won't be a part of
GSoC this year.

:(

David Bruce

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] [Tux4kids-discuss] GSOC 2011

[David B. <dav...@gm...>]

Hi Victor,

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 8:32 AM, vic...@gm...
<vic...@gm...> wrote:
> Hi,
> The idea about thread-safety for mathcards code in tuxmath still available
> for this year ?

Yes, I think that is still on the agenda.  The point is that we want
projects that either
1. Fix current problems
or
2. Add significant self-contained features (like a new minigame)

and either way, don't cause any regressions or leave unfinished business.

David

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] [Tux4kids-discuss] GSOC 2011

[Jesus M. <fo...@gm...>]

Congrats!!!

You did a way good job in GCI!
:)


-- 
Jesus Mager
[www.h1n1-al.blogspot.com]

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Article on Aviral (GCI participant)

[Holger L. <ho...@la...>]

Hi Aviral,

On Freitag, 18. März 2011, David Bruce wrote:
> http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110318/jsp/jharkhand/story_13731856.jsp

wow, very nice + inspiring article, congratulations Aviral!


cheers,
	Holger, who is verry happy and a bit proud to see tux4kids spread like this! 
Whooohooo

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Article on Aviral (GCI participant)

[Siddharth K. <sid...@gm...>]

It is an awesome article. :) Have a memorable trip Aviral!

-Siddharth

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Brendan Luchen <che...@gm...>wrote:

> Wow. Way to go, Aviral! Congratulations on the trip to Mountain View.
> Remember to try In-N-Out while you're there.
>
> Best,
> Brendan
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 8:28 AM, David Bruce <dav...@gm...>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In case anyone is interested, there is an article on Aviral Dasgupta,
>> who contributed a ton of code to tux4kids for GCI and has remained an
>> active member of the project.  It isn't quite technically precise, but
>> it is interesting, and it gives us a bit of nice publicity:
>>
>> http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110318/jsp/jharkhand/story_13731856.jsp
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
>> A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
>> for your organization - today and in the future.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tuxmath-devel mailing list
>> Tux...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxmath-devel
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
> A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
> for your organization - today and in the future.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
> _______________________________________________
> Tuxmath-devel mailing list
> Tux...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxmath-devel
>
>

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Article on Aviral (GCI participant)

[<vic...@gm...>]

Really nice Aviral ! Congrats !


On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Brendan Luchen <che...@gm...>wrote:

> Wow. Way to go, Aviral! Congratulations on the trip to Mountain View.
> Remember to try In-N-Out while you're there.
>
> Best,
> Brendan
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 8:28 AM, David Bruce <dav...@gm...>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In case anyone is interested, there is an article on Aviral Dasgupta,
>> who contributed a ton of code to tux4kids for GCI and has remained an
>> active member of the project.  It isn't quite technically precise, but
>> it is interesting, and it gives us a bit of nice publicity:
>>
>> http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110318/jsp/jharkhand/story_13731856.jsp
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
>> A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
>> for your organization - today and in the future.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tuxmath-devel mailing list
>> Tux...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxmath-devel
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
> A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
> for your organization - today and in the future.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
> _______________________________________________
> Tuxmath-devel mailing list
> Tux...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxmath-devel
>
>


-- 
----------------
Victor Toso

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Article on Aviral (GCI participant)

[Brendan L. <che...@gm...>]

Wow. Way to go, Aviral! Congratulations on the trip to Mountain View.
Remember to try In-N-Out while you're there.

Best,
Brendan

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 8:28 AM, David Bruce <dav...@gm...>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In case anyone is interested, there is an article on Aviral Dasgupta,
> who contributed a ton of code to tux4kids for GCI and has remained an
> active member of the project.  It isn't quite technically precise, but
> it is interesting, and it gives us a bit of nice publicity:
>
> http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110318/jsp/jharkhand/story_13731856.jsp
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
> A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
> for your organization - today and in the future.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
> _______________________________________________
> Tuxmath-devel mailing list
> Tux...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxmath-devel
>

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] [Tux4kids-discuss] GSOC 2011

[<vic...@gm...>]

Hi,

The idea about thread-safety for mathcards code in tuxmath still available
for this year ?
I'm really enjoying working with networks and OS. That would be a fun
project for me.


-- 
----------------
Victor Toso