tuxmath-devel — TuxMath developer's mailing list.

[Tuxmath-devel] Further clarifications about maintainance (was: Tuxmath maintainance?)

[Bastien G. <bz...@gn...>]

Hi all,

i'm at lost (again) about what the current situation is and I
would like to help clarify it so that we can all move forward.

Let me know if I'm right about this:

1. David Bruce is the official current maintainer but does not
   have the time to continue.

2. Holger Levsen is the current Debian package manager and is
   still okay with packaging the Tuxmath suite.

3. Deepak has created a clone of tux4kids projects on Github and
   is also involved in helping with the GSOC aspects.

4. Laura has done some work on some repositories and is willing
   to merge this work with the main project.

5. I have write access to the alioth repositories and am willing
   to help maintaining the website.

6. tux...@li... is the central place for
   communication, even if other mailing lists exist.

If we all agree on the above, that's a good starting point :)

Now for questions and decisions we need to make:

- @Deepak: are you willing to be the new maintainer?

- @Deepak: if so, do you want to use the Github repositories as
  the main repositories (and sync the alioth ones)?

- @Laura: are you using github, alioth or other repositories?
  What would you need to use the central repositories instead
  of the ones you use today?

- @all: can we agree to archive all other mailing list and only
  advertize tuxmath-devel@ ?

If Deepak is the new maintainer and the Github repositories are
the central place for development and tuxmath-devel@ is the one
place for communication, things can move forward like this:

- Holger sets the alioth sync.

- I update the website with these informations.

- Laura submit patches against the github repos and move her
  development there.

Let me know how it goes.

Thanks,

-- 
 Bastien

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Tux4Kids main git repository?

[Pere P. i C. <per...@gm...>]

El dc 20 de 04 de 2016 a les 07:30 -0400, en/na LM va escriure:
> 
> Also, I've seen some talk on the schoolforge mailing list about the
> possibility of Tuxmath being ported to mobile devices.
> 

Hi Laura, you may find interesting tuxmathmobile made by Deepak
https://github.com/perepujal/tuxmathmobile/network/members
I don't know which of those forks is the best, you may have to
investigate.

HTH
Pere

> Thanks.
> 
> Sincerely,
> Laura
http://www.distasis.com/cpp

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Tux4Kids main git repository?

[LM <lm...@gm...>]

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:41 PM,  Scott wrote:
> Deepak is moving our repos
> all over to github so that they will be all in one location instead of
> scattered amongst several websites. URL is  https://github.com/tux4kids

This is great.

The school district that I work for actually blocks git access.  So,
it's nice to be able to generate a tarball of the latest version via
the github web site.  I had a lot of trouble trying to access the
latest files via the alioth repository.  This makes the source code
more accessible to everyone.  It's also nice to see things get more
unified rather than having code repositories and forks in various
places.

Linux distributions typically have their own packages for program
executables.  However, are there any future plans to host executables
for other systems like Windows or Mac so school districts will be able
to set up Tuxmath and Tuxtype on their systems quickly and easily?
Also, I've seen some talk on the schoolforge mailing list about the
possibility of Tuxmath being ported to mobile devices.

Thanks.

Sincerely,
Laura
http://www.distasis.com/cpp

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Tux4Kids main git repository?

[Bastien G. <bz...@gn...>]

Hi Scott,

thanks for your input.

scottmc <sco...@gm...> writes:

> The Hangout was started by the Tux4Kids admin and is just those who
> are signed up to be GSoC mentors for this year.  Same with the
> private google group mailing list.  We use it to discuss the 100+
> proposals we receive each year, to narrow those down to the number of
> slots that Google allocates for us.

Fait enough, thanks for the explanation.

> I agree, we should narrow the mailing lists down to just a tux4kids
> general mailing list instead of one for tuxtyping, tuxpaint, tuxmath,
> etc. Perhaps we just move over to using tux4kids-discuss?

That'd be good, yes.

> Also the setting on the mailing lists here seem to be a bit weird,
> they should default the reply to to be back to the mailing list and
> not to just the previous author.  Who is the admin who can fix
> that?  It's annoying.

(The current setting is the good one: it's more annoying to send
private emails to everybody than to send a collective message to
just someone... and it's really a matter of hitting the right
button in your email client.)

> We should also require our GSoC students to post bi-weekly updates
> either to the mailing list or a blog posting on the Github Tux4Kids
> site.

Yes, that'd be great!  Just posting an email on a public mailing list
would be good -- then they can publish it on a blog, on github, where
they want really.

> This year we will be able to keep a closer watch on the code
> commits with the projects all hosted in the same place.  It was
> confusing to potential new students to figure out where our code was
> and which repos were the current ones.  Hopefully this will also open
> the door to others to submit pull requests with fixes.  More
> discussion probably needs to take place on how our workflow should be
> done, such as who will maintain each of the projects, and accept/
> reject pull requests, etc.

I'm glad to see the collective energy for moving things forward into
the right direction!  This will help a lot for newcomers.

Thanks!

-- 
 Bastien

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Tux4Kids main git repository?

[scottmc <sco...@gm...>]

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Bastien Guerry <bz...@gn...> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> thanks for these clarifications, very interesting.
>
> I'm in favor of using free softwares as much as possible and of using
> a very limited set of inclusive communication tools.
>
> Using the debian repositories and a single mailing for all projects
> would do IMHO*.
>
> I very much agree with Holger about emails being more inclusive then
> Hangout, both by design and because Hangout is not free.
>
> I understand the idea of using github for the repos, and that's not a
> real problem if you decide to go this way.
>
> But I don't think using Hangout and Googles Groups is a good idea:
> it's not free software and it splits the attention into many tools.
>
> Anyway, back to my initial concern: Deepak, are you the official
> maintainer for the Tux* projects?
>
> If so, can you summarize the decisions on the repositories and the
> communication channels so that I advertize it accurately on the
> website?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
> * I don't like *-devel@ mailing lists: users and developers should
> talk to eachother in a single canal.  Remember the "you-don't-have-a
> scalability-problem-yet" principle?  Same goes for communication: as
> long as you don't need to split your lists for various audiences, just
> use one list.  I guess 99% the -devel* mailing lists spread years ago
> just by imitation, because it seemed a well-established practice.
>
> --


Copying the other mailing lists that I know of.  Deepak is moving our repos
all over to github so that they will be all in one location instead of
scattered amongst several websites. URL is  https://github.com/tux4kids

The Hangout was started by the Tux4Kids admin and is just those who are
signed up to be GSoC mentors for this year.  Same with the private google
group mailing list.  We use it to discuss the 100+ proposals we receive
each year, to narrow those down to the number of slots that Google
allocates for us.

I agree, we should narrow the mailing lists down to just a tux4kids general
mailing list instead of one for tuxtyping, tuxpaint, tuxmath, etc. Perhaps
we just move over to using tux4kids-discuss?  Also the setting on the
mailing lists here seem to be a bit weird, they should default the reply to
to be back to the mailing list and not to just the previous author.  Who is
the admin who can fix that?  It's annoying.

We should also require our GSoC students to post bi-weekly updates either
to the mailing list or a blog posting on the Github Tux4Kids site. This
year we will be able to keep a closer watch on the code commits with the
projects all hosted in the same place.  It was confusing to potential new
students to figure out where our code was and which repos were the current
ones.  Hopefully this will also open the door to others to submit pull
requests with fixes.  More discussion probably needs to take place on how
our workflow should be done, such as who will maintain each of the
projects, and accept/reject pull requests, etc.

-Scott

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Tux4Kids main git repository?

[Bastien G. <bz...@gn...>]

Hi all,

thanks for these clarifications, very interesting.

I'm in favor of using free softwares as much as possible and of using
a very limited set of inclusive communication tools.

Using the debian repositories and a single mailing for all projects
would do IMHO*.

I very much agree with Holger about emails being more inclusive then
Hangout, both by design and because Hangout is not free.

I understand the idea of using github for the repos, and that's not a
real problem if you decide to go this way.

But I don't think using Hangout and Googles Groups is a good idea:
it's not free software and it splits the attention into many tools.

Anyway, back to my initial concern: Deepak, are you the official
maintainer for the Tux* projects?

If so, can you summarize the decisions on the repositories and the
communication channels so that I advertize it accurately on the
website?

Thanks in advance!


* I don't like *-devel@ mailing lists: users and developers should
talk to eachother in a single canal.  Remember the "you-don't-have-a
scalability-problem-yet" principle?  Same goes for communication: as
long as you don't need to split your lists for various audiences, just
use one list.  I guess 99% the -devel* mailing lists spread years ago
just by imitation, because it seemed a well-established practice.

-- 
 Bastien

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Tux4Kids main git repository?

[deepak a. <dee...@gm...>]

On Apr 19, 2016 4:28 PM, "Holger Levsen" <ho...@la...> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 03:56:52PM +0530, deepak aggarwal wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Holger Levsen <ho...@la...>
> > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 03:07:02PM +0530, deepak aggarwal wrote:
> > > >  After discussing with the other mentors and contributors, we have
> > > decided to use Github for day to day development and alioth for
release.
> > > where did this discussion take place?
> > Over hangout as it's the quickest.
>
> :-( it also is rather exclusive, mail is much more inclusive, as it
> allows offline participation & is more accessible to many (think shy
> people or people less fluent in spoken words in a foreign languages).
> and (i'm pretty sure but surely might have missed it) you didnt once
> mention on the tuxmath + tuxtype list that there is a hangout "group"(?)
> for tux4kids… :/

Ya actually a lot of things are still fragmented right now.  Discussion
list is one of them.

>
> I've wondered several times where gsoc coordination for tux4kids
> happened, as it evidently did, even though there werent't any traces on
> the lists I read…

Actually there is a Tux4Kids-mentor Google group where GSoc coordination
occurs. We are using it for the past few year but we delete old threads
whenever new GSoc starts. So you wont be able to read previous years
thread.

> Bastien: (indepent of any hangouts) I btw think that we miss one list
> tux4kids-devel - we only have tux4kids-tuxtype-dev and tuxmath-devel…
>
> And we probably miss and up2date authoritive source which lists and
> other communication media exist.
>
>
> --
> cheers,
>         Holger

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Tux4Kids main git repository?

[Holger L. <ho...@la...>]

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 03:56:52PM +0530, deepak aggarwal wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Holger Levsen <ho...@la...>
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 03:07:02PM +0530, deepak aggarwal wrote:
> > >  After discussing with the other mentors and contributors, we have
> > decided to use Github for day to day development and alioth for release.
> > where did this discussion take place?
> Over hangout as it's the quickest.

:-( it also is rather exclusive, mail is much more inclusive, as it
allows offline participation & is more accessible to many (think shy
people or people less fluent in spoken words in a foreign languages). 
and (i'm pretty sure but surely might have missed it) you didnt once
mention on the tuxmath + tuxtype list that there is a hangout "group"(?)
for tux4kids… :/

I've wondered several times where gsoc coordination for tux4kids
happened, as it evidently did, even though there werent't any traces on
the lists I read…

Bastien: (indepent of any hangouts) I btw think that we miss one list
tux4kids-devel - we only have tux4kids-tuxtype-dev and tuxmath-devel…

And we probably miss and up2date authoritive source which lists and
other communication media exist. 


-- 
cheers,
	Holger

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Tux4Kids main git repository?

[deepak a. <dee...@gm...>]

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Holger Levsen <ho...@la...>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 03:07:02PM +0530, deepak aggarwal wrote:
> >  After discussing with the other mentors and contributors, we have
> decided
> > to use Github for day to day development and alioth for release.
>
> where did this discussion take place?

Over hangout as it's the quickest.



> > So this is how things will work.
> > 1. Every contributor will fork main repository and will work on
> individual
> > copy and send us a pull request.
> > 2. After verifying we will merge code in it's corresponding branch
> > 3. While releasing new code development branch will be merge with the
> > master and the new code will be pushed to alioth.
>
> do you plan to merge in master only for releases or all the time? I'd
> propose to "all the time". (And use tags for releases.)
>

ya that would be a better thing.


>
> > @ Holger If we can automate code synchronisation of Github master with
> the
> > alioth master branch that would be great.
>
> I think we first need to agree on the question above. So far I was
> rather thinking about a notification if repos are not in sync… not
> automated pushing. (Also this would need to happen on the side of the
> people pushing to github…)
>
> > I will drop an email on each and every discussion making list after we
> > finalise things and will document all the details in the read me section
> as
> > well as on the main website.
>
> again: what other discussion list exists?

I was referring individual mailing list of tuxmath, tuxpaint, tuxtype etc.


>
>
> --
> cheers,
>         Holger
>

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Tux4Kids main git repository?

[Holger L. <ho...@la...>]

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 03:07:02PM +0530, deepak aggarwal wrote:
>  After discussing with the other mentors and contributors, we have decided
> to use Github for day to day development and alioth for release.

where did this discussion take place?

> So this is how things will work.
> 1. Every contributor will fork main repository and will work on individual
> copy and send us a pull request.
> 2. After verifying we will merge code in it's corresponding branch
> 3. While releasing new code development branch will be merge with the
> master and the new code will be pushed to alioth.

do you plan to merge in master only for releases or all the time? I'd
propose to "all the time". (And use tags for releases.)

> @ Holger If we can automate code synchronisation of Github master with the
> alioth master branch that would be great.
 
I think we first need to agree on the question above. So far I was
rather thinking about a notification if repos are not in sync… not
automated pushing. (Also this would need to happen on the side of the
people pushing to github…)

> I will drop an email on each and every discussion making list after we
> finalise things and will document all the details in the read me section as
> well as on the main website.

again: what other discussion list exists?


-- 
cheers,
	Holger

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Tux4Kids main git repository?

[deepak a. <dee...@gm...>]

Hi Guys

Sorry I was traveling for the past few weeks and have very limited internet
connectivity.

 After discussing with the other mentors and contributors, we have decided
to use Github for day to day development and alioth for release.
@Bastien: I used Github importer for moving code recently, that's why it
has your latest commit.

So this is how things will work.
1. Every contributor will fork main repository and will work on individual
copy and send us a pull request.
2. After verifying we will merge code in it's corresponding branch
3. While releasing new code development branch will be merge with the
master and the new code will be pushed to alioth.

If you guys can add anything which I haven't covered that will be great.

@ Holger If we can automate code synchronisation of Github master with the
alioth master branch that would be great.

I will drop an email on each and every discussion making list after we
finalise things and will document all the details in the read me section as
well as on the main website.

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Holger Levsen <ho...@la...>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:05:38PM +0200, Bastien wrote:
> > I'm copying Deepak who kindly invited me to contribute to the Github
> > tux4kids repositories here: https://github.com/tux4kids/
> >
> > What are the relationships between the Github Tux4Kids repositories
> > and the ones on Alioth?  Which ones are upstream?
> >
> > I see https://github.com/tux4kids/tux4kids-web displays my commit so
> > I assume the alioth repos are the ones upstream as advertized on the
> > website.
> >
> > If we are to boost tux4kids development again, it'd be nice to have
> > some clarity here, otherwise we will lose too much energy.
>
> oh dear ;)
>
> I fully agree on the "we need clarity" and we need to decide on this.
> I'd propose "those who do, decide", though if there is a change, this
> change needs to be documented too.
>
> That said, if github and alioth need to be kept in sync manually, I'd be
> glad to setup some jobs on jenkins.debian.net which will notify us, if
> the repos are out of sync. Better yet: keep them in sync automatically.
>
>
> --
> cheers,
>         Holger (who doesnt want to get involved too much into the
>                 "upstream" side of tux4kids. I'll happily continue
> packaging
>                 tuxtype+tuxmath (and thus t4k-common) for Debian though…)
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications
> Manager
> Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple
> tiers of
> your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
> reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
> _______________________________________________
> Tuxmath-devel mailing list
> Tux...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxmath-devel
>
>

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Tux4Kids main git repository?

[Holger L. <ho...@la...>]

Hi,

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:05:38PM +0200, Bastien wrote:
> I'm copying Deepak who kindly invited me to contribute to the Github
> tux4kids repositories here: https://github.com/tux4kids/
> 
> What are the relationships between the Github Tux4Kids repositories
> and the ones on Alioth?  Which ones are upstream?
> 
> I see https://github.com/tux4kids/tux4kids-web displays my commit so
> I assume the alioth repos are the ones upstream as advertized on the
> website.
> 
> If we are to boost tux4kids development again, it'd be nice to have
> some clarity here, otherwise we will lose too much energy.

oh dear ;)

I fully agree on the "we need clarity" and we need to decide on this.
I'd propose "those who do, decide", though if there is a change, this
change needs to be documented too.

That said, if github and alioth need to be kept in sync manually, I'd be
glad to setup some jobs on jenkins.debian.net which will notify us, if
the repos are out of sync. Better yet: keep them in sync automatically.


-- 
cheers,
	Holger (who doesnt want to get involved too much into the
		"upstream" side of tux4kids. I'll happily continue packaging
		tuxtype+tuxmath (and thus t4k-common) for Debian though…)

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Better / Complete translation to German of Tuxmath offering

[Holger L. <ho...@la...>]

Hi Henrik,

On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 11:56:33PM +0200, Henrik Heinsch wrote:
> --> Herewith I offer support in translating the textes to German, since 
> I'm a native speaker of this language.

cool!

> Unfortunately I have no idea how to do this, I saw the link to gettext, 
> but I doubt whether this is the right way.

git clone git://git.debian.org/git/tux4kids/tuxmath.git
cd tuxmath
cd po
$editor de.po
git commit -a -m "update of German translation"
git format-patch -1

mail the generated file to this list.


-- 
cheers,
	Holger (excuse my brevity)

[Tuxmath-devel] Tux4Kids main git repository?

[Bastien <bz...@gn...>]

Hi all,

I'm copying Deepak who kindly invited me to contribute to the Github
tux4kids repositories here: https://github.com/tux4kids/

What are the relationships between the Github Tux4Kids repositories
and the ones on Alioth?  Which ones are upstream?

I see https://github.com/tux4kids/tux4kids-web displays my commit so
I assume the alioth repos are the ones upstream as advertized on the
website.

If we are to boost tux4kids development again, it'd be nice to have
some clarity here, otherwise we will lose too much energy.

Thanks to anyone who can shed some light on this!

Best,

-- 
 Bastien

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Better / Complete translation to German of Tuxmath offering

[Fòram na G. <fi...@fo...>]

There are gettext editors available, so you won't need to work on the
raw files. Look for Virtaal and PoEdit :)

Look for a file called de.po.


Sgrìobh Henrik Heinsch na leanas 17/04/2016 aig 22:56:
> Hi to all,
> 
> today I checked TuxMath 2.0.3 for my 7 years old daughter and her 
> girlfriend. The game seems to my very helpful. My system language is German.
> 
> Unfortunatly a lot a textes are still in English instead of German. I 
> also found some typos in the German translated parts. It seemed clear to 
> my how to translate/ improve it to proper German.
> 
> --> Herewith I offer support in translating the textes to German, since 
> I'm a native speaker of this language.
> 
> Unfortunately I have no idea how to do this, I saw the link to gettext, 
> but I doubt whether this is the right way.
> 
> I'm working on Linux Mint 17.2 Cinnamon 32 bit version.
> 

[Tuxmath-devel] Better / Complete translation to German of Tuxmath offering

[Henrik H. <Hen...@on...>]

Hi to all,

today I checked TuxMath 2.0.3 for my 7 years old daughter and her 
girlfriend. The game seems to my very helpful. My system language is German.

Unfortunatly a lot a textes are still in English instead of German. I 
also found some typos in the German translated parts. It seemed clear to 
my how to translate/ improve it to proper German.

--> Herewith I offer support in translating the textes to German, since 
I'm a native speaker of this language.

Unfortunately I have no idea how to do this, I saw the link to gettext, 
but I doubt whether this is the right way.

I'm working on Linux Mint 17.2 Cinnamon 32 bit version.

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen, kind regards,

Henrik Heinsch

Westerwaldstrasse 12
35641 Schöffengrund - Schwalbach
Germany - Hesse

Tel: +496445923096
Mob: +4916090551061
Fax: +496445612997

Mailto: hen...@on...

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Tuxmath maintainance?

[Holger L. <ho...@la...>]

Hi Bastien,

On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 09:13:57AM +0200, Bastien Guerry wrote:
> tbanks for your reply - the root cause of the problem was my ssh key,
> using DSA, which is not accepted.  I uploaded a new RSA key and things
> are fine now, I was able to clone and push a commit.
 
ah, good!

> Let me know if you have suggestions on things to enhance/fix on the
> website.

"hiding" alioth more, that is, use html pages hosted on alioth, but dont
use the alioth pages, except many for direct links to content.

also a section, describing where the source code repos are, and how to
submit patches would be cool. i think…


-- 
cheers,
	Holger

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Tuxmath maintainance?

[Bastien G. <bz...@gn...>]

Hi Holger,

tbanks for your reply - the root cause of the problem was my ssh key,
using DSA, which is not accepted.  I uploaded a new RSA key and things
are fine now, I was able to clone and push a commit.

Let me know if you have suggestions on things to enhance/fix on the
website.

Best,

-- 
 Bastien

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Tuxmath maintainance?

[Holger L. <ho...@la...>]

n Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:22:14AM +0200, Bastien Guerry wrote:
> Any idea on what's wrong?  My guess is that I've been approved for
> only a limited set of projects on alioth, but I'm not sure.
> 
> Let me know what other information I can provide to fix this.

does "ssh git.debian.org" work? or only "ssh bas...@de..."?
(or whatever your login is…)

once you're logged in, run "id" to see the groups you're a member of.
but it bet it's the ssh login… ssh -v git.debian.org might also help :)


-- 
cheers,
	Holger

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Tuxmath maintainance?

[Bastien G. <bz...@gn...>]

Hi,

thanks for your help.

B Luchen <che...@gm...> writes:

> Try git://git.debian.org/git/tux4kids/tux4kids-web.git

The above works but I need push access.

> For push, git+ssh://bzg...@gi.../git/tux4kids/
> tux4kids-web.git

This does not work with the same issue as the one I reported.

> Guess it was never corrected. Alioth is...a tad clunky, to put it
> kindly.

(Well, we have Savannah here for GNU... I feel the pain too!)

Best,

-- 
 Bastien

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Tuxmath maintainance?

[B L. <che...@gm...>]

Hey Bastien,

Try git://git.debian.org/git/tux4kids/tux4kids-web.git

For push, git+ssh://bzg...@gi.../git/tux4kids/tux4kids-web.git

>From http://tux4kids.alioth.debian.org/git.php:

> Note that the autogenerated documentation under the SCM tab at
https://alioth.debian.org/projects/tux4kids assumes a single global
"tux4kids" repository, and thus does not work as described there. Hopefully
this will be corrected in the near future.

Guess it was never corrected. Alioth is...a tad clunky, to put it kindly.

HTH

-B

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Bastien Guerry <bz...@gn...> wrote:

> Hi Holger,
>
> Bastien Guerry <bz...@gn...> writes:
>
> > On alioth, the "source" page for tux4kids suggests that I can clone
> > these two repositories:
> >
> > git clone https://alioth.debian.org/anonscm/git/tux4kids/tux4kids.git
> > git clone git+ssh://
> bzg...@sc...//git/tux4kids/tux4kids.git
> >
> > both it doesn't work for me.
>
> Any idea on what's wrong?  My guess is that I've been approved for
> only a limited set of projects on alioth, but I'm not sure.
>
> Let me know what other information I can provide to fix this.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
>  Bastien
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications
> Manager
> Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple
> tiers of
> your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
> reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z
> _______________________________________________
> Tuxmath-devel mailing list
> Tux...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxmath-devel
>

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Tuxmath maintainance?

[Bastien G. <bz...@gn...>]

Hi Holger,

Bastien Guerry <bz...@gn...> writes:

> On alioth, the "source" page for tux4kids suggests that I can clone
> these two repositories:
>
> git clone https://alioth.debian.org/anonscm/git/tux4kids/tux4kids.git
> git clone git+ssh://bzg...@sc...//git/tux4kids/tux4kids.git
>
> both it doesn't work for me.

Any idea on what's wrong?  My guess is that I've been approved for
only a limited set of projects on alioth, but I'm not sure.

Let me know what other information I can provide to fix this.

Thanks!

-- 
 Bastien

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Tuxmath maintainance?

[David A <da...@gm...>]

Glad to see this happening. My kids benefited from this sw.

I will be happy to help with bug fixes , testing, documentation

David

On Wednesday, April 13, 2016, B Luchen <che...@gm...> wrote:

> LM,
>
> That's *wonderful*!
>
> Not sure if I'm looking at the latest versions.  Was having issues
>> getting tarballs from github.  I believe I downloaded tuxmath at
>> 7ec075a879914d547183f0ed9520b0837d3e7d1a (
>> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/tux4kids/tuxmath.git/commit/ ) and
>> tuxtype at b89cde890f5cf6cd9e93aa1a3bf55ed413beb2f9 (
>> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/tux4kids/tuxtype.git/commit/ ).  I do
>> have several other versions on my system as well, but I'm currently
>> using those two as my starting points.
>
>
> Those are the revs I'm showing on my local copies. Should be fine as a
> starting point. The github mirrors are unofficial (AFAIK) but perhaps they
> have some work not pushed back to debian's.
>
> (cc) Deepak. Can you comment on the GitHub repos' status and give Laura
> and me (cheezmeister) access? Thanks!
>
> -B
>

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Tuxmath maintainance?

[David A <da...@ou...>]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager
Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of
your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and
reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z

Re: [Tuxmath-devel] Tuxmath maintainance?

[B L. <che...@gm...>]

LM,

That's *wonderful*!

Not sure if I'm looking at the latest versions.  Was having issues
> getting tarballs from github.  I believe I downloaded tuxmath at
> 7ec075a879914d547183f0ed9520b0837d3e7d1a (
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/tux4kids/tuxmath.git/commit/ ) and
> tuxtype at b89cde890f5cf6cd9e93aa1a3bf55ed413beb2f9 (
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/tux4kids/tuxtype.git/commit/ ).  I do
> have several other versions on my system as well, but I'm currently
> using those two as my starting points.


Those are the revs I'm showing on my local copies. Should be fine as a
starting point. The github mirrors are unofficial (AFAIK) but perhaps they
have some work not pushed back to debian's.

(cc) Deepak. Can you comment on the GitHub repos' status and give Laura and
me (cheezmeister) access? Thanks!

-B