From: Peter L. <pal...@gm...> - 2011-05-09 22:57:52
|
I think this is a difficult issue. Looking at it from what software I run and the platform I develop on, I keep my Fedora system up to date at least every six months and often more frequently. So the code I test is against a fairly recent version of PHP which is probably not installed much worldwide. We are a bunch of amateur developers, and I mean that in the nicest possible way. Whatever platform we have at home, is what we develop on and test against. If we are to have a set range of supported PHP levels, then we have to become a bunch of organised amateur developers. That means we will have to maintain a few levels of PHP on our systems to test TSNG against. That testing could take place on a planned release of TSNG I think, following a release plan agreed by all. Peter On 05/09/2011 06:05 PM, David Thompson wrote: > We've had this kind of problem in the past, and I think will have it > in the future too. > Two years ago it was the move from PHP v4 to v5, but now v5.1, v5.2 > and v5.3 all seem to have significant differences (in their libraries). > > The problem is that PHP is faster than we are, but we could use that > to our advantage. > Previously I proposed "mainstream", ie support the PHP version that > comes as standard with the main linux distros (was 5.2, but I think is > now 5.3). > > But maybe we should now go "bleeding-edge" and set 5.3 as a minimum. > It would avoid problems in development, and by the time we release it > should be mainstream. > > What's your experience? > > Tommo > |