From: Ron F. <rj...@sk...> - 2000-11-05 19:23:13
|
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 01:28:09PM -0600, Matthew Copeland wrote: > even with the contracts. If the commercial version were under the > GPL on the other hand as Henry has implied, then there is no need > for these contract things at all. I would _love_ for that to be true -- and that is my ultimate goal. But for now, we are stuck with two code bases -- our mission should we accept it, is to make OST as kickass as possible, removing any need for the other code base. cheers, rjf& |