Menu
▾
▴
tinytim-discuss — Discussions relating to tinyTiM
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(30) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(43) |
Dec
(7) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
|
| 2010 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
|
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
(14) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-10-27 12:33:15
|
Feature Requests item #2200642, was opened at 2008-10-27 13:33 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=631667&aid=2200642&group_id=102341 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: tinyTiM 2.x Status: Open Priority: 3 Private: No Submitted By: Lars Heuer (lheuer) Assigned to: Lars Heuer (lheuer) Summary: Add persistent TopicMapSystem Initial Comment: Add a TopicMapSystem implementation that synchronizes the core.TopicMaps with a directory. Each TopicMap has an associated file. At a configurable time interval the content of the topic maps is written to a file (i.e. using Binary Topic Maps (BTM)) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=631667&aid=2200642&group_id=102341 |
|
From: Lars H. <he...@se...> - 2008-10-23 15:28:33
|
[...] >> All i found about TMShare was an old paper from Kal [1]. Is it a >> product from networkedplanet or some standard? if its not a standard, >> we might leave it as a feature request. It's not a standard, though. It's a protocol based on Atom. Anyway, the spec is freely available and it is better than nothing. :) The basic idea was that tinyTiM utilises the snapshots from the server. The provided fragments will be ignored at least in the initial version. tinyTiM would contact the server, look for the available topic maps and download the topic map on request transparently for the user. The next version could also consider the fragments. I.e. download all fragments which are published later that the latest snapshot. There is also TMRAP but it has slightly other goals. I.e. downloading a complete map is not possible with TMRAP. TMRAP can be used to ask a server if it has information about a particular topic, for example. Implementing a TopicMapSystem for TMShare shouldn't be too hard. The system would establish a connection to the server, parse the overview page and use the provided topic maps as initial set of locators returned by TopicMapSystem.getLocators(). Once the user uses TopciMapSystem.getTopicMap(Locator), the system downloads the latest snapshot, deserializes it and returns the topic map. Or the system download the topic maps in a background task after it has been initialized. The TMShareTopicMapSystem would be a bit heavier than the ordinary TopicMapSystem, so it should be implemented as a tinyTiM subproject. Further, the TMShareTopicMapSystem would introduce a dependency to a deserializer package (i.e. tinytim-mio) and may introduce more dependencies, i.e. to Restlet [1] or to the HTTPClient [2]. Maybe it can be implemented with the standard Java libs (URLConnection and friends). Anyway, that's the rough idea. [1] <http://www.restlet.org/> [2] <http://hc.apache.org/> Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com> |
|
From: Lars H. <he...@se...> - 2008-10-23 14:55:36
|
Hi Stefan, > All i found about TMShare was an old paper from Kal [1]. Is it a > product from networkedplanet or some standard? if its not a standard, > we might leave it as a feature request. Ah, sorry, my fault. I expected that everybody is familiar with the paper. TMShare homepage: <http://www.egovpt.org/fg/CWA_Part_1b> TMShare paper (outdated): <http://tmra.de/2008/talks/protocol-for-the-syndication-of-semantic-descriptions.html> I updated the feature request with the links. Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com> |
|
From: Stefan L. <li...@ap...> - 2008-10-23 14:42:39
|
Hm, All i found about TMShare was an old paper from Kal [1]. Is it a product from networkedplanet or some standard? if its not a standard, we might leave it as a feature request. [1] http://www.idealliance.org/papers/dx_xmle03/papers/02-03-03/02-03-03.html 2008/10/23 Lars Heuer <he...@se...>: > [...] >> The question is, if it would be valuable to implement such a system or >> if it would be a waste of time and effort. > > Created a feature request for it: > <https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2189442&group_id=102341&atid=631667> > > Feel free to implement it, I am afraid that I won't be able to > implement it in the near future. > > Best regards, > Lars > -- > Semagia > <http://www.semagia.com> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > tinyTiM-discuss mailing list > tin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tinytim-discuss > |
|
From: Lars H. <he...@se...> - 2008-10-23 13:46:30
|
[...] > The question is, if it would be valuable to implement such a system or > if it would be a waste of time and effort. Created a feature request for it: <https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2189442&group_id=102341&atid=631667> Feel free to implement it, I am afraid that I won't be able to implement it in the near future. Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com> |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-10-21 16:53:16
|
Bugs item #2157355, was opened at 2008-10-10 14:46 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lheuer You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=631664&aid=2157355&group_id=102341 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Console Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 7 Private: No Submitted By: Lars Heuer (lheuer) Assigned to: Lars Heuer (lheuer) Summary: Console.java is invalid Initial Comment: The file Console.java is incomplete for some reason. Ends with: """ private class ReadCommand extends AbstractCommand { public ReadCommand() { super("read <source: """ Submit a working copy of Console.java! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Lars Heuer (lheuer) Date: 2008-10-21 18:53 Message: Forgot to close that bug. :/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Lars Heuer (lheuer) Date: 2008-10-21 18:52 Message: Fixed in SVN, does not work with tinyTiM in the trunk, though. Anyway, the Consolve.java file is valid now. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=631664&aid=2157355&group_id=102341 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-10-21 16:52:35
|
Bugs item #2157355, was opened at 2008-10-10 14:46 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lheuer You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=631664&aid=2157355&group_id=102341 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Console Group: None Status: Open >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 7 Private: No Submitted By: Lars Heuer (lheuer) Assigned to: Lars Heuer (lheuer) Summary: Console.java is invalid Initial Comment: The file Console.java is incomplete for some reason. Ends with: """ private class ReadCommand extends AbstractCommand { public ReadCommand() { super("read <source: """ Submit a working copy of Console.java! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Lars Heuer (lheuer) Date: 2008-10-21 18:52 Message: Fixed in SVN, does not work with tinyTiM in the trunk, though. Anyway, the Consolve.java file is valid now. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=631664&aid=2157355&group_id=102341 |
|
From: Lars H. <he...@se...> - 2008-10-21 16:34:45
|
[...]
> The topic map and the system could also be writable but there wouldn't
> be any synchronisation with the TMShare server (at least not in the
> initial version).
[...]
Basically, tinyTiM would act as client which consumes the topic maps
provided by the TMShare server. After the TopicMapSystem has been
initialized, the system would contact the TMShare server and load the
latest snapshots from the server (could be done lazily, i.e. the
initial request would just download the information about the provided
topic maps).
After a topic map has been read, tinyTiM would act independent of the
TMShare server (it does not report changes to the server, for
example).
The system could go into a another tinyTiM subproject, the core engine
wouldn't be effected. The TopicMapSystemFactory would look if the
feature "TMShare" is set and then load the specialised TopicMapSystem
(i.e. Class.forName("org.tinytim.tmshare.TopicMapSystem");). The user
would have to include additional libs only if she wants to have that
functionality.
The question is, if it would be valuable to implement such a system or
if it would be a waste of time and effort.
Best regards,
Lars
--
Semagia
<http://www.semagia.com>
|
|
From: Lars H. <he...@se...> - 2008-10-21 13:49:45
|
Hi Stefan, > I saw a photo that you got the price at TMRA congrats. Can i find some > report and slides from TMRA 2008 somewhere? Thanks, very difficult challenge... ;) I'll send you the TMShare slides as PDF. I sent them together with the other presentations and tutorials to Lutz and they should appear at the TMRA'08 site soon. I guess LMG will write something about TMRA'08. Maybe rho, too. Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com> |
|
From: Stefan L. <li...@ap...> - 2008-10-21 13:41:55
|
Hi Lars, I saw a photo that you got the price at TMRA congrats. Can i find some report and slides from TMRA 2008 somewhere? stefan 2008/10/21 Lars Heuer <he...@se...>: > Hi all, > > While working on Atomico <http://atomico.googlecode.com/> I wondered > if it would make sense to implement a TopicMapSystem for tinyTiM which > works upon TMShare. The first implementation would be read-only, I > guess. > > Something like: > > tmSysFactory.setFeature( > "http://tinytim.sf.net/feature/tmShare", > "http://iri.which.points.to.a.tmshare.overview"); > > TopicMapSystem tmSys = tmSysFactory.newTopicMapSystem(); > > for (Locator loc: tmSys.getLocators()) { > System.out.println(loc); // Prints out the available topic > // maps at the specified server > } > > TopicMap tm = tmSys.getTopicMap(loc); > > tmSys.createTopicMap(loc2); ---> Exception, the tmSys is read-only > > > The topic map and the system could also be writable but there wouldn't > be any synchronisation with the TMShare server (at least not in the > initial version). > > Thoughts? > > Best regards, > Lars > -- > Semagia > <http://www.semagia.com> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > tinyTiM-discuss mailing list > tin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tinytim-discuss > |
|
From: Lars H. <he...@se...> - 2008-10-21 13:37:52
|
Hi all, While working on Atomico <http://atomico.googlecode.com/> I wondered if it would make sense to implement a TopicMapSystem for tinyTiM which works upon TMShare. The first implementation would be read-only, I guess. Something like: tmSysFactory.setFeature( "http://tinytim.sf.net/feature/tmShare", "http://iri.which.points.to.a.tmshare.overview"); TopicMapSystem tmSys = tmSysFactory.newTopicMapSystem(); for (Locator loc: tmSys.getLocators()) { System.out.println(loc); // Prints out the available topic // maps at the specified server } TopicMap tm = tmSys.getTopicMap(loc); tmSys.createTopicMap(loc2); ---> Exception, the tmSys is read-only The topic map and the system could also be writable but there wouldn't be any synchronisation with the TMShare server (at least not in the initial version). Thoughts? Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com> |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-10-10 12:47:05
|
Bugs item #2157355, was opened at 2008-10-10 14:46 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=631664&aid=2157355&group_id=102341 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Console Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Private: No Submitted By: Lars Heuer (lheuer) Assigned to: Lars Heuer (lheuer) Summary: Console.java is invalid Initial Comment: The file Console.java is incomplete for some reason. Ends with: """ private class ReadCommand extends AbstractCommand { public ReadCommand() { super("read <source: """ Submit a working copy of Console.java! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=631664&aid=2157355&group_id=102341 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-10-10 12:40:24
|
Bugs item #2157344, was opened at 2008-10-10 14:40 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=631664&aid=2157344&group_id=102341 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Console Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Private: No Submitted By: Lars Heuer (lheuer) Assigned to: Lars Heuer (lheuer) Summary: Commands should be plugable Initial Comment: Define a SPI to let others plug-in other commands. I.e. add specific commands for the TMShare client if the client is available. Needs a better ICommand interface, though. The ICommand interface should get the arguments of the command and something that can be used to write results to, i.e. PrintWriter. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=631664&aid=2157344&group_id=102341 |
|
From: Lars H. <he...@se...> - 2008-10-10 12:35:30
|
[...] > Wouldn't be a big task to change the template in the LICENSE.txt but > IMO it can stay as it is for the time being. Some projects delete the > appendix from the file, though. Maybe I should do the same? Deleted the appendix. :) Again, thanks for the hint. Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com> |
|
From: Lars H. <he...@se...> - 2008-10-10 12:23:57
|
Hi Markus, Thanks for the hint. The section "APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work." is not part of the Terms and Conditions of the Apache license. Imo it is just a friendly hint how you add the license info to files. """" [...] To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]" replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate comment syntax for the file format. [...] """ Wouldn't be a big task to change the template in the LICENSE.txt but IMO it can stay as it is for the time being. Some projects delete the appendix from the file, though. Maybe I should do the same? Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com> |
|
From: Markus U. <mar...@gm...> - 2008-10-09 22:42:23
|
I guess I replied to the wrong list... who reads commit messages anyways? :p ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Markus Ueberall <mar...@gm...> Date: 2008/10/10 Subject: Re: [tinyTiM-commits] SF.net SVN: tinytim:[161] tinytim/trunk To: tin...@li... Hi, It seems that you forgot to brand the Apache License 2.0 template (this also applies to the copy for tinytim-mio). The files mentioned below were taken from the respective repositories/homepage: $ diff -b LICENSE.log4j LICENSE.tinytim20 190c190 < Copyright 1999-2005 The Apache Software Foundation --- > Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner] Ad astra, Markus 2008/9/18 <lh...@us...> > Revision: 161 > http://tinytim.svn.sourceforge.net/tinytim/?rev=161&view=rev > Author: lheuer > Date: 2008-09-18 13:02:34 +0000 (Thu, 18 Sep 2008) > > Log Message: > ----------- > - Moved to Apache License 2.0 [...] |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-10-07 12:51:13
|
Bugs item #2151492, was opened at 2008-10-07 14:49 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=631664&aid=2151492&group_id=102341 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Core Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Lars Heuer (lheuer) Assigned to: Lars Heuer (lheuer) Summary: Rethink event handling Initial Comment: - Event system currently blocks (all handlers must handle the event) - Events are reported before a modification happens (necessary for identity / Topic Maps constraint checking) Proposal: - Events should be handled by an instance that checks Topic Maps constraints (blocking op) - After constraint checking the event is passed to an instance that delivers the events to other subscribers (non-blocking), i.e. to the indexes - Maybe a before change / after change notification system, indexes need only the after change notification, Topic Maps constraints must be checked in the before change notification ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=631664&aid=2151492&group_id=102341 |
|
From: Lars H. <he...@se...> - 2008-09-18 12:18:43
|
Hi Stefan, > No i don't mind moving tinyTIM to ALv2, its you who is in charge > right now, so i go with you. Great. :) Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com> |
|
From: Stefan L. <li...@ap...> - 2008-09-18 12:09:29
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, No i don't mind moving tinyTIM to ALv2, its you who is in charge right now, so i go with you. Stefan Lars Heuer wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > [...] >> Im not very into this licensing stuff. but i googled and found that >> apache v2 is compatible with LGPL > >> see >> http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#GPLCompatibleLicenses > > Yes, found that too, but I am not sure if the same is true for LGPL. > They speak about "GPL", especially about v3, but LGPL is not > mentioned. > > To avoid all that licensing stuff, would you mind if tinyTiM moves to > Apache License 2? As Markus has mentioned, the LGPL vs. ALv2 stuff > seems to be very vague and each party has a different opinion. > > In particular, I am interested in a better URI / IRI handling and > currently I extract an IRI implementation from a project that uses > ALv2. So, the extracted lib would also use ALv2 and that lib I want to > use for tinyTiM. > > I tried to implement my own URI normalizer and it worked so far, but > handling the whole *IRI* stuff requires more work (Unicode, Punycode > bla bla). > > Best regards, > Lars -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFI0kODbsixtqnWg1oRAmv+AJ9waqwkoZkfepHM621ckaGsIM0OSACdF45F OHjWZDwebo8dQeDflR0CXdk= =5UPK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Lars H. <he...@se...> - 2008-09-18 12:06:39
|
Hi Stefan, [...] > Im not very into this licensing stuff. but i googled and found that > apache v2 is compatible with LGPL > see > http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#GPLCompatibleLicenses Yes, found that too, but I am not sure if the same is true for LGPL. They speak about "GPL", especially about v3, but LGPL is not mentioned. To avoid all that licensing stuff, would you mind if tinyTiM moves to Apache License 2? As Markus has mentioned, the LGPL vs. ALv2 stuff seems to be very vague and each party has a different opinion. In particular, I am interested in a better URI / IRI handling and currently I extract an IRI implementation from a project that uses ALv2. So, the extracted lib would also use ALv2 and that lib I want to use for tinyTiM. I tried to implement my own URI normalizer and it worked so far, but handling the whole *IRI* stuff requires more work (Unicode, Punycode bla bla). Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com> |
|
From: Markus U. <mar...@gm...> - 2008-09-18 08:53:33
|
Hi, as I noted on #topicmaps (log should be back soon, grr), it doesn't seem too easy to determine this, cf. http://tapestryjava.blogspot.com/2007/03/t5-spring-integration-hibernate-next.htmland the looooong discussions regarding "Compatibility of the ASL and LGPL (... in the specific case of Java)" from different mailing lists. In short: "GPL guys" say: they are compatible, "ASL guys" say: no, they are not. There's a module called "tapestry-ejb3" which at a time "got bitten" by this, cf. Howard Lewis Ship's blog post above. Maybe you could ask him directly whether this has been resolved or investigate the whereabout of the forementioned module... Ad astra, Markus 2008/9/18 Stefan Lischke <li...@ap...> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > Im not very into this licensing stuff. but i googled and found that apache > v2 is compatible with LGPL > > see http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#GPLCompatibleLicenses > > so it might be ok to use an apache license > > stefan > > Lars Heuer wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I am currently faced with the problem that I'd like to use / import a > > lib which is licensed under the Apache License 2 (ALv2) [1]. > > > > I tried to find out if I can use a lib under the ALv2 in a > > LGPL product (namely tinyTiM), but cannot find a reliable source. I > > believe it's okay to use a lib under the ALv2, but I am not > > sure. GPL3 is compatible to ALv2, but all sources are silent about > > LGPL (2/3). > > > > To cut a long story short, I wonder if we should move to the ALv2. > > > > If someone finds a reliable source that it is okay to use an ALv2 lib > > within a LGPL lib, it would be okay for me, if tinyTiM stays under the > > LGPL. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > [1] <http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt> > > > > Best regards, > > Lars > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFI0hJebsixtqnWg1oRAh7DAJ0X2l4WB/yB318Jpt2j8TvTJ4bVZQCgiwLh > cpZQKA15CJrIN3oLIbCYjNM= > =ag/a > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > tinyTiM-discuss mailing list > tin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tinytim-discuss > |
|
From: Stefan L. <li...@ap...> - 2008-09-18 08:39:49
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Im not very into this licensing stuff. but i googled and found that apache v2 is compatible with LGPL see http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#GPLCompatibleLicenses so it might be ok to use an apache license stefan Lars Heuer wrote: > Hi all, > > I am currently faced with the problem that I'd like to use / import a > lib which is licensed under the Apache License 2 (ALv2) [1]. > > I tried to find out if I can use a lib under the ALv2 in a > LGPL product (namely tinyTiM), but cannot find a reliable source. I > believe it's okay to use a lib under the ALv2, but I am not > sure. GPL3 is compatible to ALv2, but all sources are silent about > LGPL (2/3). > > To cut a long story short, I wonder if we should move to the ALv2. > > If someone finds a reliable source that it is okay to use an ALv2 lib > within a LGPL lib, it would be okay for me, if tinyTiM stays under the > LGPL. > > Thoughts? > > [1] <http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt> > > Best regards, > Lars -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFI0hJebsixtqnWg1oRAh7DAJ0X2l4WB/yB318Jpt2j8TvTJ4bVZQCgiwLh cpZQKA15CJrIN3oLIbCYjNM= =ag/a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
From: Lars H. <he...@se...> - 2008-09-17 15:56:57
|
Hi all, I am currently faced with the problem that I'd like to use / import a lib which is licensed under the Apache License 2 (ALv2) [1]. I tried to find out if I can use a lib under the ALv2 in a LGPL product (namely tinyTiM), but cannot find a reliable source. I believe it's okay to use a lib under the ALv2, but I am not sure. GPL3 is compatible to ALv2, but all sources are silent about LGPL (2/3). To cut a long story short, I wonder if we should move to the ALv2. If someone finds a reliable source that it is okay to use an ALv2 lib within a LGPL lib, it would be okay for me, if tinyTiM stays under the LGPL. Thoughts? [1] <http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt> Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com> |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-09-08 12:56:38
|
Bugs item #2047867, was opened at 2008-08-12 14:24 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lheuer You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=631664&aid=2047867&group_id=102341 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Core Group: tinyTiM 2.x Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Lars Heuer (lheuer) Assigned to: Lars Heuer (lheuer) Summary: Literal duplicate suppression Initial Comment: Better duplicate suppression: "+1"^^xsd:int is the SAME as "1"^^xsd:int. Currently, we create two different literals for that ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Lars Heuer (lheuer) Date: 2008-09-08 14:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=399396 Originator: YES 2.0.0a2 contains better dupl.suppr. for: - xsd:boolean - xsd:integer - xsd:string - xsd:decimal ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Lars Heuer (lheuer) Date: 2008-09-05 14:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=399396 Originator: YES Partially supported: - xsd:anyURI Problem: http://example.org/ and hTtP://eXamPle.org are treated as a different IRIs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Lars Heuer (lheuer) Date: 2008-09-05 14:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=399396 Originator: YES Done for: - xsd:boolean - xsd:integer - xsd:string - xsd:decimal ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=631664&aid=2047867&group_id=102341 |
|
From: Lars H. <he...@se...> - 2008-09-08 12:46:26
|
Hi all, The tinyTiM project proudly announces the availability of a new release of the tinyTiM Topic Maps engine. This release implements the TMAPI 2.0 a1 interfaces. You can download it from the tinyTiM's project page <http://tinytim.sourceforge.net/> <http://tinytim.sourceforge.net/2.0/download/> Changes ------- * Internal code refactoring * Better duplicate literal suppression What is tinyTiM? ---------------- tinyTiM is a tiny Topic Maps engine which keeps topic maps in-memory. This Topic Maps engine is meant to be used together with the TMAPI 2.0 interfaces, see <http://www.tmapi.org/2.0/> for details. Feedback is welcome! :) Best regards, Lars and the tinyTiM project -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com> |
7 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
