tilp-devel

[TiLP-devel] ROM_SE undeclared

[James C. <ja...@co...>]

Hi there.  I'm not a developer of this project, but have some 
programming knowledge and would like to fix this if I can.  I noticed 
that while I can build 6.76 successfully, 6.80 does not.  The errors I 
get are:

tilp_calcs.c:301: error: `ROM_SE' undeclared (first use in this function)
tilp_calcs.c:301: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
tilp_calcs.c:301: error: for each function it appears in.)

I diffed 6.76's version of this file with 6.80's and found this line 
specifically:

tilp_calcs.c:                           return do_rom_dump((ret == 
BUTTON1) ? ROM_SE : 0);

I grepped through all the source looking for any mention of ROM_SE, and 
found that there was none.  I'm assuming that this is supposed to be a 
#define that somehow didn't make its way into the source, but could 
someone tell me what that value is?  If you'd like, I can fix this 
(assuming someone tells me what to change) and post a patch.

I really want to get this thing to build :)  Thanks very much in advance.

James

-- 
My blog: http://www.crazydrclaw.com/
My homepage: http://james.colannino.org/

"If Carpenters made houses the way programmers design programs, the first woodpecker to come along would destroy all of civilization." --Computer Proverb

Re: [TiLP-devel] ROM_SE undeclared {Scanned for spam & virus}

[Romain <ro...@li...>]

Hi James,

> Hi there.  I'm not a developer of this project, but have some
> programming knowledge and would like to fix this if I can.  I noticed
> that while I can build 6.76 successfully, 6.80 does not.  The errors I
> get are:
>
> tilp_calcs.c:301: error: `ROM_SE' undeclared (first use in this functio=
n)
> tilp_calcs.c:301: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only o=
nce
> tilp_calcs.c:301: error: for each function it appears in.)
>
> I diffed 6.76's version of this file with 6.80's and found this line
> specifically:
>
> tilp_calcs.c:                           return do_rom_dump((ret =3D=3D
> BUTTON1) ? ROM_SE : 0);
>
> I grepped through all the source looking for any mention of ROM_SE, and
> found that there was none.  I'm assuming that this is supposed to be a
> #define that somehow didn't make its way into the source, but could
> someone tell me what that value is?  If you'd like, I can fix this
> (assuming someone tells me what to change) and post a patch.

ROM_SE is defined in calc_def.h:
<<
} TicalcMaskMode;

// ROM size for the ROM dump function
typedef enum {
  ROM_1MB =3D 1, ROM_2MB, ROM_SE,
} TicalcRomSize;
>>

This change has been introduced in ticalcs >=3D 4.5.7. Did you updated yo=
ur
libti* ?

> I really want to get this thing to build :)  Thanks very much in advanc=
e.
>
> James

roms.

>
> --
> My blog: http://www.crazydrclaw.com/
> My homepage: http://james.colannino.org/
>
> "If Carpenters made houses the way programmers design programs, the fir=
st
> woodpecker to come along would destroy all of civilization." --Computer
> Proverb
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
> files
> for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D103432&bid=3D230486&dat=
=3D121642
> _______________________________________________
> TiLP-devel mailing list
> TiL...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tilp-devel
>


--=20
Romain Li=E9vin :		<ro...@li...>
Web site :		http://www.lievin.net
"Linux, y'a moins bien mais c'est plus cher !"