From: Romain <ro...@li...> - 2007-01-21 08:47:03
|
Hi, > As I understand it, the package names should be libticables2-1, > libticalcs2-2, libtifiles2-3, and libticonv2. > > version number.) The package 'libticables2' would be API version 2 of = the > original libticables library. > > The package version numbers, however, should still be > 1.0.3/1.0.2/1.0.2/1.0.1. I completely agree with Benjamin. As stated, package version number is different of the library version number. For an explanation, see here: <http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual.html#Updating-version-info> > > Benjamin Romain. > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= -- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share > your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D= DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > TiLP-devel mailing list > TiL...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tilp-devel > --=20 email: <ro...@li...> web: <http://www.lievin.net> "Linux, y'a moins bien mais c'est plus cher !" |