Re: [TiLP-devel] Re: Upcoming TiLP release

[Romain L. <rom...@wa...>]

Hi,

On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 11:29:31AM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> "Romain Lievin" <rom...@wa...> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > 1°) About version number: there will not be a 7.xx but it will be a 
> > release >= 6.50 (currently 6.65). Given that the current release is just a 
> > port to GTK+ 2.0.  and does not include major enhancements, I did not increase 
> > the major number.
> 
> Hopefully, starting with the next 6.xx release we should see a joint
> release for Linux/Mac OS X/FreeBSD/Windows.
> 
> It means that :
>  - all changes will need to be committed to the repository
>  - a build on all platforms will need to be tested before the release
>  - Romain finally pushes the big red button
> 
> > 2°) There is a stuff which is lacking in the current release of TiLP: the GFM
> > (Group File Manager) plugin. It was present in earlier version of TiLP but
> > as a built-in feature.
> 
> Uh uh. That means I'll have to add plugin support on OS X. Duh.
> 

It will be great but nobody wants to develop for TiLP and I can not do all
stuffs.

> > 3°) I would have loved this version extensively tested before being 
> > released. Unfortunately, I'm not at school any longer and I have to use
> > emulators for calcs I don't own. Thus, testing is quite so far to be perfect.
> > I'm currently discussing a calculator loan Texas Instruments France.
> 
> I'm having some calcs tested by OS X users (TI83+/V200, and TI89 of course)
> 
> > 4°) CVS repository is not fully working at this time.
> 
> s/CVS/Subversion/ and it should be available on Tuesday evening if the
> changes between 6.62 and 6.62 are small (they should be).
> 
> > 4°) We are at the end of April. May is coming soon. I think we can wait for
> > you...
> >
> > Anyways, the official release will not be done now. I (Linux/Win32) will do
> > some pre-release on ticalc.org before in order to get some feedback, fix-up
> > stuff, re-release, ... THis may take a while.
> 
> Same for me.
> 
> I still have another problem, wrt libticalcs and glib
> version. Although we discussed it before implementing the current
> solution, I'm not too comfortable with it. Having the soname bumped to
> 5 still seems the right way to me, but oh well.
> 
> JB.
> 
> -- 
> BOFH excuse #44:
> bank holiday - system operating credits  not recharged
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> TiLP-devel mailing list
> TiL...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tilp-devel

roms.
-- 
Romain Lievin, aka 'roms'  	<ro...@ti...>
The TiLP project is on 		<http://www.ti-lpg.org>
"Linux, y'a moins bien mais c'est plus cher !"