|
From: Fredrik <fr...@mo...> - 2007-09-23 14:49:30
|
> Fredrik Modéen schrieb: >>>> When It comes to bookmarks/history I think we should use NetPositive's >>>> >>>> I know we talked about not use NetOptimist (from now NetOpt) code but >>>> when >>>> I checked there code I found some gui part's that I couldn't resist >>>> using. >>>> >>>> I think that we should use gui part from NetOpt and later when we want >>>> to >>>> rewrite the gui we can remove them. (I can make big remarks around >>>> them >>>> :) >>>> ) >>> Pending a response from the devs of Themis, I'd suspect that would be a >>> good way to go.... Just make sure you do this on all the pieces you >>> pull >>> in from NetOptimist. Then, later Mark or Raymond can note what they >>> want >>> done. You mentioned rewriting the code later..., did you have a better >>> design in mind that meant you might want to write the UI code from >>> scratch >>> according to that design? >> No most clean up but Raymond talked about rewriting the gui :) > > Why not taking any NetOptimist code as inspiration and implementing our > own? This way you don't scew the code with comments and code which might > be adopted to the existing ui framework and be later removed or > refactored anyway. Sounds like work done twice. Nobody hinders you/us to It would be work done twice :) and I have no problem with both :) > take inspiration from other code. And btw, it doesn't hurt if the > Bookmarks implementation takes a little longer as there is nothing to > show your rendered bookmarks right now. Right now nothing happens but years ago I think one was able to surf the net? Are this anything we can do to show anything? like the html text? > When it comes to storing bookmarks, a file system hierarchy would do, > but at some point one might wan't arrange entries. So a flat filesystem > won't do. I guess that is why Mozilla & Co is going for some crazy > netscape bookmark html. Filesystem plus display-position attribute, > favicon as attrib or icon anyone? About file bookmarks as netposetive does, makes them search able from the OS taking advantage of BFS. If wee need more information in a file then we can add those. > > Greets, > Michael > >> >>> I don't know if this would be appropriate or not, but maybe add a TODO >>> file to the main Themis directory and make a note in there that there >>> is >>> code with the weird comments around it that need to be cleaned up or >>> dealt >>> with at some point (so it isn't forgotten about). Or if you think this >>> is >>> redundant or a bad idea, then don't bother. >> To me the code from NetOpt are not a bad thing it's more what Raymond >> says >> and accepts in to svn :) >> >> I have looked at UZI but having problem compiling it. Will take that in >> the UZI project and some other questions like images are handled and so >> on. >> >> >>> Kevin >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Themis-dev mailing list >>> The...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/themis-dev >>> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Themis-dev mailing list > The...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/themis-dev > -- MVH Fredrik Modéen |