Re: [Themis-dev] Some changes

[Michael W. <em...@m-...>]

Fredrik Modéen schrieb:
>>> When It comes to bookmarks/history I think we should use NetPositive's
>>>
>>> I know we talked about not use NetOptimist (from now NetOpt) code but
>>> when
>>> I checked there code I found some gui part's that I couldn't resist
>>> using.
>>>
>>> I think that we should use gui part from NetOpt and later when we want
>>> to
>>> rewrite the gui we can remove them. (I can make big remarks around them
>>> :)
>>> )
>> Pending a response from the devs of Themis, I'd suspect that would be a
>> good way to go....  Just make sure you do this on all the pieces you pull
>> in from NetOptimist.  Then, later Mark or Raymond can note what they want
>> done.  You mentioned rewriting the code later..., did you have a better
>> design in mind that meant you might want to write the UI code from scratch
>> according to that design?
> No  most clean up but Raymond talked about rewriting the gui :)

Why not taking any NetOptimist code as inspiration and implementing our 
own? This way you don't scew the code with comments and code which might 
be adopted to the existing ui framework and be later removed or 
refactored anyway. Sounds like work done twice. Nobody hinders you/us to 
take inspiration from other code. And btw, it doesn't hurt if the 
Bookmarks implementation takes a little longer as there is nothing to 
show your rendered bookmarks right now.
When it comes to storing bookmarks, a file system hierarchy would do, 
but at some point one might wan't arrange entries. So a flat filesystem 
won't do. I guess that is why Mozilla & Co is going for some crazy 
netscape bookmark html. Filesystem plus display-position attribute, 
favicon as attrib or icon anyone?

Greets,
Michael

> 
>> I don't know if this would be appropriate or not, but maybe add a TODO
>> file to the main Themis directory and make a note in there that there is
>> code with the weird comments around it that need to be cleaned up or dealt
>> with at some point (so it isn't forgotten about).  Or if you think this is
>> redundant or a bad idea, then don't bother.
> To me the code from NetOpt are not a bad thing it's more what Raymond says
> and accepts in to svn :)
> 
> I have looked at UZI but having problem compiling it. Will take that in
> the UZI project and some other questions like images are handled and so
> on.
> 
> 
>> Kevin
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Themis-dev mailing list
>> The...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/themis-dev
>>
> 
>